{"items":[{"id":"NVI-00006310","kind":"vulnerability","title":"CI4MS has a Deactivated User Session Bypass (active=0)","revision":3,"unknowns":["Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.","NVD lastModified does not establish freshness of every associated CPE record."],"lifecycle":"active","identifiers":["GHSA-5hfv-c864-qcq9","CVE-2026-41891"],"plain_summary":"OSV carries this publisher advisory for ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms. This is an aggregated source copy; consult the original publisher and compare update dates.","review_status":"source_listed","control_topics":[],"public_actions":[{"summary":"The original advisory lists fixed boundaries 0.31.8.0 for ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms. Confirm the publisher’s latest guidance.","source_ids":["sr-afc491afca7078b4c472ba9996fb8575"],"action_type":"vendor_patch","limitations":"Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system.","current_supported_target":null},{"summary":"Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.","source_ids":["sr-20412fce9ea5826ae827b7d87b3210f7"],"action_type":"investigate","limitations":"Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system.","current_supported_target":null}],"schema_version":"1.1.0","source_metrics":[{"kind":"CVSS","as_of":"2026-10-26T19:10:00.163Z","value":"5.3 MEDIUM (4.0)","meaning":"security-advisories@github.com severity; no combined Null risk score.","source_id":"sr-14ade49d3eef2c0163500773b299bc58"},{"kind":"EPSS","as_of":"2026-11-01T12:00:16.000Z","value":"0.269%","meaning":"FIRST EPSS model v2026.06.15; exploitation probability over 30 days, percentile 0.1916. Missing scores are unknown.","source_id":"sr-20412fce9ea5826ae827b7d87b3210f7"}],"why_it_matters":"Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.","related_sources":[{"id":"sr-afc491afca7078b4c472ba9996fb8575","url":"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-5hfv-c864-qcq9","basis":"vendor_advisory","notes":"GitHub-origin advisory, CC-BY-4.0; OSV is an aggregate copy, not independent corroboration.","title":"GHSA-5hfv-c864-qcq9","publisher":"GitHub Advisory Database via OSV","observed_at":"2026-10-31T21:41:59.922Z"},{"id":"sr-14ade49d3eef2c0163500773b299bc58","url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-41891","basis":"official_catalog","notes":"This product uses data from the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.","title":"CVE-2026-41891","publisher":"NIST National Vulnerability Database","observed_at":"2026-11-01T07:24:02.489Z"},{"id":"sr-20412fce9ea5826ae827b7d87b3210f7","url":"https://www.first.org/epss/data.html","basis":"official_catalog","notes":"FIRST EPSS; probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, not local compromise. Dataset date/model retained; FIRST services terms apply.","title":"CVE-2026-41891","publisher":"FIRST EPSS","observed_at":"2026-11-01T14:28:32.278Z"}],"affected_context":[{"certainty":"source_listed","source_ids":["sr-afc491afca7078b4c472ba9996fb8575"],"technology":"ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms","known_exclusions":[],"conditions_summary":"### Summary\nThe auth filter has the deactivated/banned user check commented out. \n\n### Details\nCodeIgniter Shield's `loggedIn()` re-checks the `status` field (catching `status='banned'`), but does **not** re-check the `active` field for existing sessions. When an admin deactivates a user (`active=0`) after they have already logged in:\n- Their session cookie remains valid\n- `auth()->loggedIn()` still returns `true`\n- The commented-out code is the only mechanism that would have checked `!$user->active`\n\n### Evidence\n\n\n\n### Impact\n- User deactivation does NOT immediately revoke backend access\n- Deactivated user retains full access until session expires (default: 7200s)\n\n### Additional note\nThe commented-out block appears to be a deferred placeholder — it was written but disabled from the very first commit that introduced the filter, and has never been active. The later addition of SessionTracker (v0.31.4.0) suggests the dev was aware of the session revocation gap, but account-level deactivation (users.active = 0) remains unenforced. Could you verify if this","public_affected_ranges":["ECOSYSTEM: introduced 0.26.0; fixed 0.31.8.0"]}],"null_published_at":"2026-11-04T18:04:03.144Z","source_updated_at":"2026-05-08T20:31:16.460Z","source_disclosed_at":"2026-05-04T20:50:55.000Z","is_synthetic_fixture":false,"null_last_reviewed_at":null,"public_change_summary":"Dated EPSS estimate updated; this is not a new disclosure or proof of exploitation.","null_first_observed_at":"2026-10-31T21:41:59.922Z"},{"id":"NVI-00006310","kind":"vulnerability","title":"CI4MS has a Deactivated User Session Bypass (active=0)","revision":2,"unknowns":["Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.","NVD lastModified does not establish freshness of every associated CPE record."],"lifecycle":"active","identifiers":["GHSA-5hfv-c864-qcq9","CVE-2026-41891"],"plain_summary":"OSV carries this publisher advisory for ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms. This is an aggregated source copy; consult the original publisher and compare update dates.","review_status":"source_listed","control_topics":[],"public_actions":[{"summary":"The original advisory lists fixed boundaries 0.31.8.0 for ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms. Confirm the publisher’s latest guidance.","source_ids":["sr-afc491afca7078b4c472ba9996fb8575"],"action_type":"vendor_patch","limitations":"Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system.","current_supported_target":null},{"summary":"Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.","source_ids":["sr-14ade49d3eef2c0163500773b299bc58"],"action_type":"investigate","limitations":"Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system.","current_supported_target":null}],"schema_version":"1.1.0","source_metrics":[{"kind":"CVSS","as_of":"2026-10-26T19:10:00.163Z","value":"5.3 MEDIUM (4.0)","meaning":"security-advisories@github.com severity; no combined Null risk score.","source_id":"sr-14ade49d3eef2c0163500773b299bc58"}],"why_it_matters":"Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.","related_sources":[{"id":"sr-afc491afca7078b4c472ba9996fb8575","url":"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-5hfv-c864-qcq9","basis":"vendor_advisory","notes":"GitHub-origin advisory, CC-BY-4.0; OSV is an aggregate copy, not independent corroboration.","title":"GHSA-5hfv-c864-qcq9","publisher":"GitHub Advisory Database via OSV","observed_at":"2026-10-31T21:41:59.922Z"},{"id":"sr-14ade49d3eef2c0163500773b299bc58","url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-41891","basis":"official_catalog","notes":"This product uses data from the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.","title":"CVE-2026-41891","publisher":"NIST National Vulnerability Database","observed_at":"2026-11-01T07:24:02.489Z"}],"affected_context":[{"certainty":"source_listed","source_ids":["sr-afc491afca7078b4c472ba9996fb8575"],"technology":"ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms","known_exclusions":[],"conditions_summary":"### Summary\nThe auth filter has the deactivated/banned user check commented out. \n\n### Details\nCodeIgniter Shield's `loggedIn()` re-checks the `status` field (catching `status='banned'`), but does **not** re-check the `active` field for existing sessions. When an admin deactivates a user (`active=0`) after they have already logged in:\n- Their session cookie remains valid\n- `auth()->loggedIn()` still returns `true`\n- The commented-out code is the only mechanism that would have checked `!$user->active`\n\n### Evidence\n\n\n\n### Impact\n- User deactivation does NOT immediately revoke backend access\n- Deactivated user retains full access until session expires (default: 7200s)\n\n### Additional note\nThe commented-out block appears to be a deferred placeholder — it was written but disabled from the very first commit that introduced the filter, and has never been active. The later addition of SessionTracker (v0.31.4.0) suggests the dev was aware of the session revocation gap, but account-level deactivation (users.active = 0) remains unenforced. Could you verify if this","public_affected_ranges":["ECOSYSTEM: introduced 0.26.0; fixed 0.31.8.0"]}],"null_published_at":"2026-11-01T14:34:07.531Z","source_updated_at":"2026-05-08T20:31:16.460Z","source_disclosed_at":"2026-05-04T20:50:55.000Z","is_synthetic_fixture":false,"null_last_reviewed_at":null,"public_change_summary":"Source facts changed; compare the preserved prior revision.","null_first_observed_at":"2026-10-31T21:41:59.922Z"},{"id":"NVI-00006310","kind":"vulnerability","title":"CI4MS has a Deactivated User Session Bypass (active=0)","revision":1,"unknowns":["Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected."],"lifecycle":"active","identifiers":["GHSA-5hfv-c864-qcq9","CVE-2026-41891"],"plain_summary":"OSV carries this publisher advisory for ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms. This is an aggregated source copy; consult the original publisher and compare update dates.","review_status":"source_listed","control_topics":[],"public_actions":[{"summary":"The original advisory lists fixed boundaries 0.31.8.0 for ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms. Confirm the publisher’s latest guidance.","source_ids":["sr-afc491afca7078b4c472ba9996fb8575"],"action_type":"vendor_patch","limitations":"Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system.","current_supported_target":null}],"schema_version":"1.1.0","source_metrics":[],"why_it_matters":"Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.","related_sources":[{"id":"sr-afc491afca7078b4c472ba9996fb8575","url":"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-5hfv-c864-qcq9","basis":"vendor_advisory","notes":"GitHub-origin advisory, CC-BY-4.0; OSV is an aggregate copy, not independent corroboration.","title":"GHSA-5hfv-c864-qcq9","publisher":"GitHub Advisory Database via OSV","observed_at":"2026-10-31T21:41:59.922Z"}],"affected_context":[{"certainty":"source_listed","source_ids":["sr-afc491afca7078b4c472ba9996fb8575"],"technology":"ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms","known_exclusions":[],"conditions_summary":"### Summary\nThe auth filter has the deactivated/banned user check commented out. \n\n### Details\nCodeIgniter Shield's `loggedIn()` re-checks the `status` field (catching `status='banned'`), but does **not** re-check the `active` field for existing sessions. When an admin deactivates a user (`active=0`) after they have already logged in:\n- Their session cookie remains valid\n- `auth()->loggedIn()` still returns `true`\n- The commented-out code is the only mechanism that would have checked `!$user->active`\n\n### Evidence\n\n\n\n### Impact\n- User deactivation does NOT immediately revoke backend access\n- Deactivated user retains full access until session expires (default: 7200s)\n\n### Additional note\nThe commented-out block appears to be a deferred placeholder — it was written but disabled from the very first commit that introduced the filter, and has never been active. The later addition of SessionTracker (v0.31.4.0) suggests the dev was aware of the session revocation gap, but account-level deactivation (users.active = 0) remains unenforced. Could you verify if this","public_affected_ranges":["ECOSYSTEM: introduced 0.26.0; fixed 0.31.8.0"]}],"null_published_at":"2026-10-31T22:13:10.049Z","source_updated_at":"2026-05-08T20:31:16.460Z","source_disclosed_at":"2026-05-04T20:50:55.000Z","is_synthetic_fixture":false,"null_last_reviewed_at":null,"public_change_summary":"First indexed by Null; source disclosure date is shown separately.","null_first_observed_at":"2026-10-31T21:41:59.922Z"}],"next_cursor":null,"snapshot_revision":"42594"}