{"items":[{"id":"NVI-00006797","kind":"vulnerability","title":"phpMyFAQ's Missing CONFIGURATION_EDIT Permission Check on 12 Admin API Configuration Tab Endpoints Allows Information Disclosure by Any Authenticated User","revision":4,"unknowns":["Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.","NVD lastModified does not establish freshness of every associated CPE record."],"lifecycle":"active","identifiers":["GHSA-rm98-82fr-mcfx","CVE-2026-45007"],"plain_summary":"GitHub lists this reviewed advisory for thorsten/phpmyfaq, phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq. Published version ranges and source prerequisites are shown below; this is not an inspection of a visitor’s application.","review_status":"source_listed","control_topics":[],"public_actions":[{"summary":"Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.","source_ids":["sr-25476c36a6943392429159c033ab683a"],"action_type":"investigate","limitations":"Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system.","current_supported_target":null},{"summary":"The original advisory lists fixed boundaries 4.1.2 for thorsten/phpmyfaq. Confirm the publisher’s latest guidance.","source_ids":["sr-c2db5f1c3def57d1fb60d7626d44b6ab"],"action_type":"vendor_patch","limitations":"Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system.","current_supported_target":null},{"summary":"The original advisory lists fixed boundaries 4.1.2 for phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq. Confirm the publisher’s latest guidance.","source_ids":["sr-c2db5f1c3def57d1fb60d7626d44b6ab"],"action_type":"vendor_patch","limitations":"Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system.","current_supported_target":null}],"schema_version":"1.1.0","source_metrics":[{"kind":"CVSS","as_of":"2026-06-09T00:03:19.000Z","value":"4.3 medium","meaning":"GitHub source severity; exploitability and local consequence require separate evidence.","source_id":"sr-49b3f54cc8bd49a6461268d28e9503c0"},{"kind":"CVSS","as_of":"2026-10-26T14:10:00.130Z","value":"4.3 MEDIUM (3.1)","meaning":"disclosure@vulncheck.com severity; no combined Null risk score.","source_id":"sr-8f370b94a3d8b2eb21d3d8ea5990d853"},{"kind":"CVSS","as_of":"2026-10-26T14:10:00.130Z","value":"5.3 MEDIUM (4.0)","meaning":"disclosure@vulncheck.com severity; no combined Null risk score.","source_id":"sr-8f370b94a3d8b2eb21d3d8ea5990d853"},{"kind":"EPSS","as_of":"2026-10-31T12:00:27.000Z","value":"0.261%","meaning":"FIRST EPSS model v2026.06.15; exploitation probability over 30 days, percentile 0.17844. Missing scores are unknown.","source_id":"sr-25476c36a6943392429159c033ab683a"}],"why_it_matters":"Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.","related_sources":[{"id":"sr-49b3f54cc8bd49a6461268d28e9503c0","url":"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-rm98-82fr-mcfx","basis":"vendor_advisory","notes":"GitHub Advisory Database; CC-BY-4.0. Each advisory links its original attribution. Null normalizes fields.","title":"GHSA-rm98-82fr-mcfx","publisher":"GitHub Advisory Database","observed_at":"2026-11-06T20:58:31.464Z"},{"id":"sr-c2db5f1c3def57d1fb60d7626d44b6ab","url":"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-rm98-82fr-mcfx","basis":"vendor_advisory","notes":"GitHub-origin advisory, CC-BY-4.0; OSV is an aggregate copy, not independent corroboration.","title":"GHSA-rm98-82fr-mcfx","publisher":"GitHub Advisory Database via OSV","observed_at":"2026-10-31T21:42:41.364Z"},{"id":"sr-8f370b94a3d8b2eb21d3d8ea5990d853","url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-45007","basis":"official_catalog","notes":"This product uses data from the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.","title":"CVE-2026-45007","publisher":"NIST National Vulnerability Database","observed_at":"2026-11-01T07:24:02.489Z"},{"id":"sr-25476c36a6943392429159c033ab683a","url":"https://www.first.org/epss/data.html","basis":"official_catalog","notes":"FIRST EPSS; probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, not local compromise. Dataset date/model retained; FIRST services terms apply.","title":"CVE-2026-45007","publisher":"FIRST EPSS","observed_at":"2026-10-31T22:06:15.379Z"}],"affected_context":[{"certainty":"source_listed","source_ids":["sr-49b3f54cc8bd49a6461268d28e9503c0"],"technology":"thorsten/phpmyfaq","known_exclusions":[],"conditions_summary":"## Summary\n\n12 endpoints in `ConfigurationTabController.php` use `userIsAuthenticated()` (login-only check) instead of `userHasPermission(PermissionType::CONFIGURATION_EDIT)`. This allows any authenticated user — including ones with zero admin permissions — to enumerate system configuration metadata including the permission model, active template, cache backend, mail provider, and translation provider.\n\n## Details\n\nThe `ConfigurationTabController` contains 15 public endpoints. Three of them (`list`, `save`, `uploadTheme`) correctly enforce `CONFIGURATION_EDIT` permission:\n\n```php\n// phpmyfaq/src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Administration/Api/ConfigurationTabController.php:63\npublic function list(Request $request): Response\n{\n    $this->userHasPermission(PermissionType::CONFIGURATION_EDIT); // ✅ Correct\n    // ...\n}\n```\n\nThe remaining 12 only check that the user is logged in:\n\n```php\n// phpmyfaq/src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Administration/Api/ConfigurationTabController.php:353\npublic function translations(): Response\n{\n    $this->userIsAuthenticated(); // ❌ Missing permission check\n    // ...\n}\n```\n\nThe difference between these two methods is significant:\n\n```php\n// AbstractController.php:258 — ","public_affected_ranges":["<= 4.1.1"]},{"certainty":"source_listed","source_ids":["sr-49b3f54cc8bd49a6461268d28e9503c0"],"technology":"phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq","known_exclusions":[],"conditions_summary":"## Summary\n\n12 endpoints in `ConfigurationTabController.php` use `userIsAuthenticated()` (login-only check) instead of `userHasPermission(PermissionType::CONFIGURATION_EDIT)`. This allows any authenticated user — including ones with zero admin permissions — to enumerate system configuration metadata including the permission model, active template, cache backend, mail provider, and translation provider.\n\n## Details\n\nThe `ConfigurationTabController` contains 15 public endpoints. Three of them (`list`, `save`, `uploadTheme`) correctly enforce `CONFIGURATION_EDIT` permission:\n\n```php\n// phpmyfaq/src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Administration/Api/ConfigurationTabController.php:63\npublic function list(Request $request): Response\n{\n    $this->userHasPermission(PermissionType::CONFIGURATION_EDIT); // ✅ Correct\n    // ...\n}\n```\n\nThe remaining 12 only check that the user is logged in:\n\n```php\n// phpmyfaq/src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Administration/Api/ConfigurationTabController.php:353\npublic function translations(): Response\n{\n    $this->userIsAuthenticated(); // ❌ Missing permission check\n    // ...\n}\n```\n\nThe difference between these two methods is significant:\n\n```php\n// AbstractController.php:258 — ","public_affected_ranges":["<= 4.1.1"]},{"certainty":"source_listed","source_ids":["sr-c2db5f1c3def57d1fb60d7626d44b6ab"],"technology":"thorsten/phpmyfaq","known_exclusions":[],"conditions_summary":"## Summary\n\n12 endpoints in `ConfigurationTabController.php` use `userIsAuthenticated()` (login-only check) instead of `userHasPermission(PermissionType::CONFIGURATION_EDIT)`. This allows any authenticated user — including ones with zero admin permissions — to enumerate system configuration metadata including the permission model, active template, cache backend, mail provider, and translation provider.\n\n## Details\n\nThe `ConfigurationTabController` contains 15 public endpoints. Three of them (`list`, `save`, `uploadTheme`) correctly enforce `CONFIGURATION_EDIT` permission:\n\n```php\n// phpmyfaq/src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Administration/Api/ConfigurationTabController.php:63\npublic function list(Request $request): Response\n{\n    $this->userHasPermission(PermissionType::CONFIGURATION_EDIT); // ✅ Correct\n    // ...\n}\n```\n\nThe remaining 12 only check that the user is logged in:\n\n```php\n// phpmyfaq/src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Administration/Api/ConfigurationTabController.php:353\npublic function translations(): Response\n{\n    $this->userIsAuthenticated(); // ❌ Missing permission check\n    // ...\n}\n```\n\nThe difference between these two methods is significant:\n\n```php\n// AbstractController.php:258 — ","public_affected_ranges":["ECOSYSTEM: introduced 0; fixed 4.1.2"]},{"certainty":"source_listed","source_ids":["sr-c2db5f1c3def57d1fb60d7626d44b6ab"],"technology":"phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq","known_exclusions":[],"conditions_summary":"## Summary\n\n12 endpoints in `ConfigurationTabController.php` use `userIsAuthenticated()` (login-only check) instead of `userHasPermission(PermissionType::CONFIGURATION_EDIT)`. This allows any authenticated user — including ones with zero admin permissions — to enumerate system configuration metadata including the permission model, active template, cache backend, mail provider, and translation provider.\n\n## Details\n\nThe `ConfigurationTabController` contains 15 public endpoints. Three of them (`list`, `save`, `uploadTheme`) correctly enforce `CONFIGURATION_EDIT` permission:\n\n```php\n// phpmyfaq/src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Administration/Api/ConfigurationTabController.php:63\npublic function list(Request $request): Response\n{\n    $this->userHasPermission(PermissionType::CONFIGURATION_EDIT); // ✅ Correct\n    // ...\n}\n```\n\nThe remaining 12 only check that the user is logged in:\n\n```php\n// phpmyfaq/src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Administration/Api/ConfigurationTabController.php:353\npublic function translations(): Response\n{\n    $this->userIsAuthenticated(); // ❌ Missing permission check\n    // ...\n}\n```\n\nThe difference between these two methods is significant:\n\n```php\n// AbstractController.php:258 — ","public_affected_ranges":["ECOSYSTEM: introduced 0; fixed 4.1.2"]}],"null_published_at":"2026-11-07T07:07:39.866Z","source_updated_at":"2026-06-09T00:03:19.000Z","source_disclosed_at":"2026-05-06T20:24:39.000Z","is_synthetic_fixture":false,"null_last_reviewed_at":null,"public_change_summary":"Source facts changed; compare the preserved prior revision.","null_first_observed_at":"2026-10-31T21:42:41.364Z"},{"id":"NVI-00006797","kind":"vulnerability","title":"phpMyFAQ's Missing CONFIGURATION_EDIT Permission Check on 12 Admin API Configuration Tab Endpoints Allows Information Disclosure by Any Authenticated User","revision":3,"unknowns":["Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.","NVD lastModified does not establish freshness of every associated CPE record."],"lifecycle":"active","identifiers":["GHSA-rm98-82fr-mcfx","CVE-2026-45007"],"plain_summary":"OSV carries this publisher advisory for thorsten/phpmyfaq, phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq. This is an aggregated source copy; consult the original publisher and compare update dates.","review_status":"source_listed","control_topics":[],"public_actions":[{"summary":"The original advisory lists fixed boundaries 4.1.2 for thorsten/phpmyfaq. Confirm the publisher’s latest guidance.","source_ids":["sr-c2db5f1c3def57d1fb60d7626d44b6ab"],"action_type":"vendor_patch","limitations":"Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system.","current_supported_target":null},{"summary":"The original advisory lists fixed boundaries 4.1.2 for phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq. Confirm the publisher’s latest guidance.","source_ids":["sr-c2db5f1c3def57d1fb60d7626d44b6ab"],"action_type":"vendor_patch","limitations":"Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system.","current_supported_target":null},{"summary":"Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.","source_ids":["sr-25476c36a6943392429159c033ab683a"],"action_type":"investigate","limitations":"Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system.","current_supported_target":null}],"schema_version":"1.1.0","source_metrics":[{"kind":"CVSS","as_of":"2026-10-26T14:10:00.130Z","value":"4.3 MEDIUM (3.1)","meaning":"disclosure@vulncheck.com severity; no combined Null risk score.","source_id":"sr-8f370b94a3d8b2eb21d3d8ea5990d853"},{"kind":"CVSS","as_of":"2026-10-26T14:10:00.130Z","value":"5.3 MEDIUM (4.0)","meaning":"disclosure@vulncheck.com severity; no combined Null risk score.","source_id":"sr-8f370b94a3d8b2eb21d3d8ea5990d853"},{"kind":"EPSS","as_of":"2026-10-31T12:00:27.000Z","value":"0.261%","meaning":"FIRST EPSS model v2026.06.15; exploitation probability over 30 days, percentile 0.17844. Missing scores are unknown.","source_id":"sr-25476c36a6943392429159c033ab683a"}],"why_it_matters":"Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.","related_sources":[{"id":"sr-c2db5f1c3def57d1fb60d7626d44b6ab","url":"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-rm98-82fr-mcfx","basis":"vendor_advisory","notes":"GitHub-origin advisory, CC-BY-4.0; OSV is an aggregate copy, not independent corroboration.","title":"GHSA-rm98-82fr-mcfx","publisher":"GitHub Advisory Database via OSV","observed_at":"2026-10-31T21:42:41.364Z"},{"id":"sr-8f370b94a3d8b2eb21d3d8ea5990d853","url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-45007","basis":"official_catalog","notes":"This product uses data from the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.","title":"CVE-2026-45007","publisher":"NIST National Vulnerability Database","observed_at":"2026-11-01T07:24:02.489Z"},{"id":"sr-25476c36a6943392429159c033ab683a","url":"https://www.first.org/epss/data.html","basis":"official_catalog","notes":"FIRST EPSS; probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, not local compromise. Dataset date/model retained; FIRST services terms apply.","title":"CVE-2026-45007","publisher":"FIRST EPSS","observed_at":"2026-10-31T22:06:15.379Z"}],"affected_context":[{"certainty":"source_listed","source_ids":["sr-c2db5f1c3def57d1fb60d7626d44b6ab"],"technology":"thorsten/phpmyfaq","known_exclusions":[],"conditions_summary":"## Summary\n\n12 endpoints in `ConfigurationTabController.php` use `userIsAuthenticated()` (login-only check) instead of `userHasPermission(PermissionType::CONFIGURATION_EDIT)`. This allows any authenticated user — including ones with zero admin permissions — to enumerate system configuration metadata including the permission model, active template, cache backend, mail provider, and translation provider.\n\n## Details\n\nThe `ConfigurationTabController` contains 15 public endpoints. Three of them (`list`, `save`, `uploadTheme`) correctly enforce `CONFIGURATION_EDIT` permission:\n\n```php\n// phpmyfaq/src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Administration/Api/ConfigurationTabController.php:63\npublic function list(Request $request): Response\n{\n    $this->userHasPermission(PermissionType::CONFIGURATION_EDIT); // ✅ Correct\n    // ...\n}\n```\n\nThe remaining 12 only check that the user is logged in:\n\n```php\n// phpmyfaq/src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Administration/Api/ConfigurationTabController.php:353\npublic function translations(): Response\n{\n    $this->userIsAuthenticated(); // ❌ Missing permission check\n    // ...\n}\n```\n\nThe difference between these two methods is significant:\n\n```php\n// AbstractController.php:258 — ","public_affected_ranges":["ECOSYSTEM: introduced 0; fixed 4.1.2"]},{"certainty":"source_listed","source_ids":["sr-c2db5f1c3def57d1fb60d7626d44b6ab"],"technology":"phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq","known_exclusions":[],"conditions_summary":"## Summary\n\n12 endpoints in `ConfigurationTabController.php` use `userIsAuthenticated()` (login-only check) instead of `userHasPermission(PermissionType::CONFIGURATION_EDIT)`. This allows any authenticated user — including ones with zero admin permissions — to enumerate system configuration metadata including the permission model, active template, cache backend, mail provider, and translation provider.\n\n## Details\n\nThe `ConfigurationTabController` contains 15 public endpoints. Three of them (`list`, `save`, `uploadTheme`) correctly enforce `CONFIGURATION_EDIT` permission:\n\n```php\n// phpmyfaq/src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Administration/Api/ConfigurationTabController.php:63\npublic function list(Request $request): Response\n{\n    $this->userHasPermission(PermissionType::CONFIGURATION_EDIT); // ✅ Correct\n    // ...\n}\n```\n\nThe remaining 12 only check that the user is logged in:\n\n```php\n// phpmyfaq/src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Administration/Api/ConfigurationTabController.php:353\npublic function translations(): Response\n{\n    $this->userIsAuthenticated(); // ❌ Missing permission check\n    // ...\n}\n```\n\nThe difference between these two methods is significant:\n\n```php\n// AbstractController.php:258 — ","public_affected_ranges":["ECOSYSTEM: introduced 0; fixed 4.1.2"]}],"null_published_at":"2026-11-03T17:49:21.374Z","source_updated_at":"2026-09-10T03:50:47.472Z","source_disclosed_at":"2026-05-06T20:24:39.000Z","is_synthetic_fixture":false,"null_last_reviewed_at":null,"public_change_summary":"Source facts changed; compare the preserved prior revision.","null_first_observed_at":"2026-10-31T21:42:41.364Z"},{"id":"NVI-00006797","kind":"vulnerability","title":"phpMyFAQ's Missing CONFIGURATION_EDIT Permission Check on 12 Admin API Configuration Tab Endpoints Allows Information Disclosure by Any Authenticated User","revision":2,"unknowns":["Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected."],"lifecycle":"active","identifiers":["GHSA-rm98-82fr-mcfx","CVE-2026-45007"],"plain_summary":"OSV carries this publisher advisory for thorsten/phpmyfaq, phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq. This is an aggregated source copy; consult the original publisher and compare update dates.","review_status":"source_listed","control_topics":[],"public_actions":[{"summary":"The original advisory lists fixed boundaries 4.1.2 for thorsten/phpmyfaq. Confirm the publisher’s latest guidance.","source_ids":["sr-c2db5f1c3def57d1fb60d7626d44b6ab"],"action_type":"vendor_patch","limitations":"Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system.","current_supported_target":null},{"summary":"The original advisory lists fixed boundaries 4.1.2 for phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq. Confirm the publisher’s latest guidance.","source_ids":["sr-c2db5f1c3def57d1fb60d7626d44b6ab"],"action_type":"vendor_patch","limitations":"Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system.","current_supported_target":null},{"summary":"Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.","source_ids":["sr-25476c36a6943392429159c033ab683a"],"action_type":"investigate","limitations":"Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system.","current_supported_target":null}],"schema_version":"1.1.0","source_metrics":[{"kind":"EPSS","as_of":"2026-10-31T12:00:27.000Z","value":"0.261%","meaning":"FIRST EPSS model v2026.06.15; exploitation probability over 30 days, percentile 0.17844. Missing scores are unknown.","source_id":"sr-25476c36a6943392429159c033ab683a"}],"why_it_matters":"Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.","related_sources":[{"id":"sr-c2db5f1c3def57d1fb60d7626d44b6ab","url":"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-rm98-82fr-mcfx","basis":"vendor_advisory","notes":"GitHub-origin advisory, CC-BY-4.0; OSV is an aggregate copy, not independent corroboration.","title":"GHSA-rm98-82fr-mcfx","publisher":"GitHub Advisory Database via OSV","observed_at":"2026-10-31T21:42:41.364Z"},{"id":"sr-25476c36a6943392429159c033ab683a","url":"https://www.first.org/epss/data.html","basis":"official_catalog","notes":"FIRST EPSS; probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, not local compromise. Dataset date/model retained; FIRST services terms apply.","title":"CVE-2026-45007","publisher":"FIRST EPSS","observed_at":"2026-10-31T22:06:15.379Z"}],"affected_context":[{"certainty":"source_listed","source_ids":["sr-c2db5f1c3def57d1fb60d7626d44b6ab"],"technology":"thorsten/phpmyfaq","known_exclusions":[],"conditions_summary":"## Summary\n\n12 endpoints in `ConfigurationTabController.php` use `userIsAuthenticated()` (login-only check) instead of `userHasPermission(PermissionType::CONFIGURATION_EDIT)`. This allows any authenticated user — including ones with zero admin permissions — to enumerate system configuration metadata including the permission model, active template, cache backend, mail provider, and translation provider.\n\n## Details\n\nThe `ConfigurationTabController` contains 15 public endpoints. Three of them (`list`, `save`, `uploadTheme`) correctly enforce `CONFIGURATION_EDIT` permission:\n\n```php\n// phpmyfaq/src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Administration/Api/ConfigurationTabController.php:63\npublic function list(Request $request): Response\n{\n    $this->userHasPermission(PermissionType::CONFIGURATION_EDIT); // ✅ Correct\n    // ...\n}\n```\n\nThe remaining 12 only check that the user is logged in:\n\n```php\n// phpmyfaq/src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Administration/Api/ConfigurationTabController.php:353\npublic function translations(): Response\n{\n    $this->userIsAuthenticated(); // ❌ Missing permission check\n    // ...\n}\n```\n\nThe difference between these two methods is significant:\n\n```php\n// AbstractController.php:258 — ","public_affected_ranges":["ECOSYSTEM: introduced 0; fixed 4.1.2"]},{"certainty":"source_listed","source_ids":["sr-c2db5f1c3def57d1fb60d7626d44b6ab"],"technology":"phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq","known_exclusions":[],"conditions_summary":"## Summary\n\n12 endpoints in `ConfigurationTabController.php` use `userIsAuthenticated()` (login-only check) instead of `userHasPermission(PermissionType::CONFIGURATION_EDIT)`. This allows any authenticated user — including ones with zero admin permissions — to enumerate system configuration metadata including the permission model, active template, cache backend, mail provider, and translation provider.\n\n## Details\n\nThe `ConfigurationTabController` contains 15 public endpoints. Three of them (`list`, `save`, `uploadTheme`) correctly enforce `CONFIGURATION_EDIT` permission:\n\n```php\n// phpmyfaq/src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Administration/Api/ConfigurationTabController.php:63\npublic function list(Request $request): Response\n{\n    $this->userHasPermission(PermissionType::CONFIGURATION_EDIT); // ✅ Correct\n    // ...\n}\n```\n\nThe remaining 12 only check that the user is logged in:\n\n```php\n// phpmyfaq/src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Administration/Api/ConfigurationTabController.php:353\npublic function translations(): Response\n{\n    $this->userIsAuthenticated(); // ❌ Missing permission check\n    // ...\n}\n```\n\nThe difference between these two methods is significant:\n\n```php\n// AbstractController.php:258 — ","public_affected_ranges":["ECOSYSTEM: introduced 0; fixed 4.1.2"]}],"null_published_at":"2026-10-31T22:27:09.614Z","source_updated_at":"2026-09-10T03:50:47.472Z","source_disclosed_at":"2026-05-06T20:24:39.000Z","is_synthetic_fixture":false,"null_last_reviewed_at":null,"public_change_summary":"Dated EPSS estimate updated; this is not a new disclosure or proof of exploitation.","null_first_observed_at":"2026-10-31T21:42:41.364Z"},{"id":"NVI-00006797","kind":"vulnerability","title":"phpMyFAQ's Missing CONFIGURATION_EDIT Permission Check on 12 Admin API Configuration Tab Endpoints Allows Information Disclosure by Any Authenticated User","revision":1,"unknowns":["Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected."],"lifecycle":"active","identifiers":["GHSA-rm98-82fr-mcfx","CVE-2026-45007"],"plain_summary":"OSV carries this publisher advisory for thorsten/phpmyfaq, phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq. This is an aggregated source copy; consult the original publisher and compare update dates.","review_status":"source_listed","control_topics":[],"public_actions":[{"summary":"The original advisory lists fixed boundaries 4.1.2 for thorsten/phpmyfaq. Confirm the publisher’s latest guidance.","source_ids":["sr-c2db5f1c3def57d1fb60d7626d44b6ab"],"action_type":"vendor_patch","limitations":"Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system.","current_supported_target":null},{"summary":"The original advisory lists fixed boundaries 4.1.2 for phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq. Confirm the publisher’s latest guidance.","source_ids":["sr-c2db5f1c3def57d1fb60d7626d44b6ab"],"action_type":"vendor_patch","limitations":"Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system.","current_supported_target":null}],"schema_version":"1.1.0","source_metrics":[],"why_it_matters":"Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.","related_sources":[{"id":"sr-c2db5f1c3def57d1fb60d7626d44b6ab","url":"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-rm98-82fr-mcfx","basis":"vendor_advisory","notes":"GitHub-origin advisory, CC-BY-4.0; OSV is an aggregate copy, not independent corroboration.","title":"GHSA-rm98-82fr-mcfx","publisher":"GitHub Advisory Database via OSV","observed_at":"2026-10-31T21:42:41.364Z"}],"affected_context":[{"certainty":"source_listed","source_ids":["sr-c2db5f1c3def57d1fb60d7626d44b6ab"],"technology":"thorsten/phpmyfaq","known_exclusions":[],"conditions_summary":"## Summary\n\n12 endpoints in `ConfigurationTabController.php` use `userIsAuthenticated()` (login-only check) instead of `userHasPermission(PermissionType::CONFIGURATION_EDIT)`. This allows any authenticated user — including ones with zero admin permissions — to enumerate system configuration metadata including the permission model, active template, cache backend, mail provider, and translation provider.\n\n## Details\n\nThe `ConfigurationTabController` contains 15 public endpoints. Three of them (`list`, `save`, `uploadTheme`) correctly enforce `CONFIGURATION_EDIT` permission:\n\n```php\n// phpmyfaq/src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Administration/Api/ConfigurationTabController.php:63\npublic function list(Request $request): Response\n{\n    $this->userHasPermission(PermissionType::CONFIGURATION_EDIT); // ✅ Correct\n    // ...\n}\n```\n\nThe remaining 12 only check that the user is logged in:\n\n```php\n// phpmyfaq/src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Administration/Api/ConfigurationTabController.php:353\npublic function translations(): Response\n{\n    $this->userIsAuthenticated(); // ❌ Missing permission check\n    // ...\n}\n```\n\nThe difference between these two methods is significant:\n\n```php\n// AbstractController.php:258 — ","public_affected_ranges":["ECOSYSTEM: introduced 0; fixed 4.1.2"]},{"certainty":"source_listed","source_ids":["sr-c2db5f1c3def57d1fb60d7626d44b6ab"],"technology":"phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq","known_exclusions":[],"conditions_summary":"## Summary\n\n12 endpoints in `ConfigurationTabController.php` use `userIsAuthenticated()` (login-only check) instead of `userHasPermission(PermissionType::CONFIGURATION_EDIT)`. This allows any authenticated user — including ones with zero admin permissions — to enumerate system configuration metadata including the permission model, active template, cache backend, mail provider, and translation provider.\n\n## Details\n\nThe `ConfigurationTabController` contains 15 public endpoints. Three of them (`list`, `save`, `uploadTheme`) correctly enforce `CONFIGURATION_EDIT` permission:\n\n```php\n// phpmyfaq/src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Administration/Api/ConfigurationTabController.php:63\npublic function list(Request $request): Response\n{\n    $this->userHasPermission(PermissionType::CONFIGURATION_EDIT); // ✅ Correct\n    // ...\n}\n```\n\nThe remaining 12 only check that the user is logged in:\n\n```php\n// phpmyfaq/src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Administration/Api/ConfigurationTabController.php:353\npublic function translations(): Response\n{\n    $this->userIsAuthenticated(); // ❌ Missing permission check\n    // ...\n}\n```\n\nThe difference between these two methods is significant:\n\n```php\n// AbstractController.php:258 — ","public_affected_ranges":["ECOSYSTEM: introduced 0; fixed 4.1.2"]}],"null_published_at":"2026-10-31T22:13:10.085Z","source_updated_at":"2026-09-10T03:50:47.472Z","source_disclosed_at":"2026-05-06T20:24:39.000Z","is_synthetic_fixture":false,"null_last_reviewed_at":null,"public_change_summary":"First indexed by Null; source disclosure date is shown separately.","null_first_observed_at":"2026-10-31T21:42:41.364Z"}],"next_cursor":null,"snapshot_revision":"42594"}