{"items":[{"id":"NVI-00009029","kind":"vulnerability","title":"OpenAM: Unauthenticated Authentication Bypass via RADIUS Spoofing","revision":3,"unknowns":["Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.","NVD lastModified does not establish freshness of every associated CPE record."],"lifecycle":"active","identifiers":["GHSA-386j-6m86-78f9","CVE-2026-46560"],"plain_summary":"GitHub lists this reviewed advisory for org.openidentityplatform.openam:openam-radius. Published version ranges and source prerequisites are shown below; this is not an inspection of a visitor’s application.","review_status":"source_listed","control_topics":[],"public_actions":[{"summary":"Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.","source_ids":["sr-81e43ee044ad7dbaf24d90a3696e6984"],"action_type":"investigate","limitations":"Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system.","current_supported_target":null}],"schema_version":"1.1.0","source_metrics":[{"kind":"CVSS","as_of":"2026-10-28T15:20:07.000Z","value":"7.5 high","meaning":"GitHub source severity; exploitability and local consequence require separate evidence.","source_id":"sr-7fb378adf34258bcc2a63fbb4afbbcbf"},{"kind":"CVSS","as_of":"2026-10-30T19:37:07.073Z","value":"7.5 HIGH (3.1)","meaning":"security-advisories@github.com severity; no combined Null risk score.","source_id":"sr-1415319a9b2283bee484b458884c4013"},{"kind":"EPSS","as_of":"2026-10-31T12:00:27.000Z","value":"0.186%","meaning":"FIRST EPSS model v2026.06.15; exploitation probability over 30 days, percentile 0.08171. Missing scores are unknown.","source_id":"sr-81e43ee044ad7dbaf24d90a3696e6984"}],"why_it_matters":"Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.","related_sources":[{"id":"sr-7fb378adf34258bcc2a63fbb4afbbcbf","url":"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-386j-6m86-78f9","basis":"vendor_advisory","notes":"GitHub Advisory Database; CC-BY-4.0. Each advisory links its original attribution. Null normalizes fields.","title":"GHSA-386j-6m86-78f9","publisher":"GitHub Advisory Database","observed_at":"2026-10-31T21:56:36.327Z"},{"id":"sr-1415319a9b2283bee484b458884c4013","url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-46560","basis":"official_catalog","notes":"This product uses data from the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.","title":"CVE-2026-46560","publisher":"NIST National Vulnerability Database","observed_at":"2026-11-03T22:35:28.075Z"},{"id":"sr-81e43ee044ad7dbaf24d90a3696e6984","url":"https://www.first.org/epss/data.html","basis":"official_catalog","notes":"FIRST EPSS; probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, not local compromise. Dataset date/model retained; FIRST services terms apply.","title":"CVE-2026-46560","publisher":"FIRST EPSS","observed_at":"2026-10-31T22:06:15.379Z"}],"affected_context":[{"certainty":"source_listed","source_ids":["sr-7fb378adf34258bcc2a63fbb4afbbcbf"],"technology":"org.openidentityplatform.openam:openam-radius","known_exclusions":[],"conditions_summary":"## Summary\n\n**Description**\n\nAn Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature (CWE-347) issue in OpenAM's RADIUS authentication module allows an unauthenticated network attacker to spoof an Access-Accept response and obtain an OpenAM session for any RADIUS username, without knowing the configured shared secret. This affects OpenAM Community Edition through version 16.0.6 and was patched in version 16.1.1.\n\nThe RADIUS client opens an unconnected datagram socket and treats the first UDP datagram delivered to its source port as authoritative. The receive path does not check the source IP/port, does not match the response identifier to the outstanding request, and does not verify the Response Authenticator (RFC 2865 §3); the RFC 2869 Message-Authenticator is neither sent nor required. Any non-Reject/non-Challenge packet is treated as success, so a forged Access-Accept is accepted as a valid login.\n\n## Impact\nOpenAM Community Edition deployments through version 16.0.6 where an administrator has enabled a RADIUS module instance on a login chain are potentially affected. An attacker either races the real server on-path, or off-path sprays forged Access-Accept packets at the OpenAM clie","public_affected_ranges":["< 16.1.1"]}],"null_published_at":"2026-11-04T10:04:35.911Z","source_updated_at":"2026-10-28T15:20:07.000Z","source_disclosed_at":"2026-06-25T17:22:24.000Z","is_synthetic_fixture":false,"null_last_reviewed_at":null,"public_change_summary":"Source facts changed; compare the preserved prior revision.","null_first_observed_at":"2026-10-31T21:56:36.327Z"},{"id":"NVI-00009029","kind":"vulnerability","title":"OpenAM: Unauthenticated Authentication Bypass via RADIUS Spoofing","revision":2,"unknowns":["Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected."],"lifecycle":"active","identifiers":["GHSA-386j-6m86-78f9","CVE-2026-46560"],"plain_summary":"GitHub lists this reviewed advisory for org.openidentityplatform.openam:openam-radius. Published version ranges and source prerequisites are shown below; this is not an inspection of a visitor’s application.","review_status":"source_listed","control_topics":[],"public_actions":[{"summary":"Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.","source_ids":["sr-81e43ee044ad7dbaf24d90a3696e6984"],"action_type":"investigate","limitations":"Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system.","current_supported_target":null}],"schema_version":"1.1.0","source_metrics":[{"kind":"CVSS","as_of":"2026-10-28T15:20:07.000Z","value":"7.5 high","meaning":"GitHub source severity; exploitability and local consequence require separate evidence.","source_id":"sr-7fb378adf34258bcc2a63fbb4afbbcbf"},{"kind":"EPSS","as_of":"2026-10-31T12:00:27.000Z","value":"0.186%","meaning":"FIRST EPSS model v2026.06.15; exploitation probability over 30 days, percentile 0.08171. Missing scores are unknown.","source_id":"sr-81e43ee044ad7dbaf24d90a3696e6984"}],"why_it_matters":"Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.","related_sources":[{"id":"sr-7fb378adf34258bcc2a63fbb4afbbcbf","url":"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-386j-6m86-78f9","basis":"vendor_advisory","notes":"GitHub Advisory Database; CC-BY-4.0. Each advisory links its original attribution. Null normalizes fields.","title":"GHSA-386j-6m86-78f9","publisher":"GitHub Advisory Database","observed_at":"2026-10-31T21:56:36.327Z"},{"id":"sr-81e43ee044ad7dbaf24d90a3696e6984","url":"https://www.first.org/epss/data.html","basis":"official_catalog","notes":"FIRST EPSS; probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, not local compromise. Dataset date/model retained; FIRST services terms apply.","title":"CVE-2026-46560","publisher":"FIRST EPSS","observed_at":"2026-10-31T22:06:15.379Z"}],"affected_context":[{"certainty":"source_listed","source_ids":["sr-7fb378adf34258bcc2a63fbb4afbbcbf"],"technology":"org.openidentityplatform.openam:openam-radius","known_exclusions":[],"conditions_summary":"## Summary\n\n**Description**\n\nAn Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature (CWE-347) issue in OpenAM's RADIUS authentication module allows an unauthenticated network attacker to spoof an Access-Accept response and obtain an OpenAM session for any RADIUS username, without knowing the configured shared secret. This affects OpenAM Community Edition through version 16.0.6 and was patched in version 16.1.1.\n\nThe RADIUS client opens an unconnected datagram socket and treats the first UDP datagram delivered to its source port as authoritative. The receive path does not check the source IP/port, does not match the response identifier to the outstanding request, and does not verify the Response Authenticator (RFC 2865 §3); the RFC 2869 Message-Authenticator is neither sent nor required. Any non-Reject/non-Challenge packet is treated as success, so a forged Access-Accept is accepted as a valid login.\n\n## Impact\nOpenAM Community Edition deployments through version 16.0.6 where an administrator has enabled a RADIUS module instance on a login chain are potentially affected. An attacker either races the real server on-path, or off-path sprays forged Access-Accept packets at the OpenAM clie","public_affected_ranges":["< 16.1.1"]}],"null_published_at":"2026-11-03T02:33:09.085Z","source_updated_at":"2026-10-28T15:20:07.000Z","source_disclosed_at":"2026-06-25T17:22:24.000Z","is_synthetic_fixture":false,"null_last_reviewed_at":null,"public_change_summary":"Dated EPSS estimate updated; this is not a new disclosure or proof of exploitation.","null_first_observed_at":"2026-10-31T21:56:36.327Z"},{"id":"NVI-00009029","kind":"vulnerability","title":"OpenAM: Unauthenticated Authentication Bypass via RADIUS Spoofing","revision":1,"unknowns":["Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected."],"lifecycle":"active","identifiers":["GHSA-386j-6m86-78f9","CVE-2026-46560"],"plain_summary":"GitHub lists this reviewed advisory for org.openidentityplatform.openam:openam-radius. Published version ranges and source prerequisites are shown below; this is not an inspection of a visitor’s application.","review_status":"source_listed","control_topics":[],"public_actions":[{"summary":"Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.","source_ids":["sr-7fb378adf34258bcc2a63fbb4afbbcbf"],"action_type":"investigate","limitations":"Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system.","current_supported_target":null}],"schema_version":"1.1.0","source_metrics":[{"kind":"CVSS","as_of":"2026-10-28T15:20:07.000Z","value":"7.5 high","meaning":"GitHub source severity; exploitability and local consequence require separate evidence.","source_id":"sr-7fb378adf34258bcc2a63fbb4afbbcbf"}],"why_it_matters":"Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.","related_sources":[{"id":"sr-7fb378adf34258bcc2a63fbb4afbbcbf","url":"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-386j-6m86-78f9","basis":"vendor_advisory","notes":"GitHub Advisory Database; CC-BY-4.0. Each advisory links its original attribution. Null normalizes fields.","title":"GHSA-386j-6m86-78f9","publisher":"GitHub Advisory Database","observed_at":"2026-10-31T21:56:36.327Z"}],"affected_context":[{"certainty":"source_listed","source_ids":["sr-7fb378adf34258bcc2a63fbb4afbbcbf"],"technology":"org.openidentityplatform.openam:openam-radius","known_exclusions":[],"conditions_summary":"## Summary\n\n**Description**\n\nAn Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature (CWE-347) issue in OpenAM's RADIUS authentication module allows an unauthenticated network attacker to spoof an Access-Accept response and obtain an OpenAM session for any RADIUS username, without knowing the configured shared secret. This affects OpenAM Community Edition through version 16.0.6 and was patched in version 16.1.1.\n\nThe RADIUS client opens an unconnected datagram socket and treats the first UDP datagram delivered to its source port as authoritative. The receive path does not check the source IP/port, does not match the response identifier to the outstanding request, and does not verify the Response Authenticator (RFC 2865 §3); the RFC 2869 Message-Authenticator is neither sent nor required. Any non-Reject/non-Challenge packet is treated as success, so a forged Access-Accept is accepted as a valid login.\n\n## Impact\nOpenAM Community Edition deployments through version 16.0.6 where an administrator has enabled a RADIUS module instance on a login chain are potentially affected. An attacker either races the real server on-path, or off-path sprays forged Access-Accept packets at the OpenAM clie","public_affected_ranges":["< 16.1.1"]}],"null_published_at":"2026-10-31T22:13:31.267Z","source_updated_at":"2026-10-28T15:20:07.000Z","source_disclosed_at":"2026-06-25T17:22:24.000Z","is_synthetic_fixture":false,"null_last_reviewed_at":null,"public_change_summary":"First indexed by Null; source disclosure date is shown separately.","null_first_observed_at":"2026-10-31T21:56:36.327Z"}],"next_cursor":null,"snapshot_revision":"42594"}