{"items":[{"id":"NVI-00010645","kind":"vulnerability","title":"obsidian-tc: Declined human-in-the-loop confirmations can permit destructive calls over HTTP","revision":6,"unknowns":["Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.","NVD lastModified does not establish freshness of every associated CPE record."],"lifecycle":"active","identifiers":["GHSA-737x-cwfr-5vvc","CVE-2026-115477"],"plain_summary":"GitHub lists this reviewed advisory for obsidian-tc. Published version ranges and source prerequisites are shown below; this is not an inspection of a visitor’s application.","review_status":"source_listed","control_topics":[],"public_actions":[{"summary":"Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.","source_ids":["sr-25d8a5df65740e43ac47fa580e9015ff"],"action_type":"investigate","limitations":"Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system.","current_supported_target":null},{"summary":"The original advisory lists fixed boundaries 1.31.4 for obsidian-tc. Confirm the publisher’s latest guidance.","source_ids":["sr-9cdb206f8adec7491ed8a02f019cc18a"],"action_type":"vendor_patch","limitations":"Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system.","current_supported_target":null}],"schema_version":"1.1.0","source_metrics":[{"kind":"CVSS","as_of":"2026-10-29T18:17:23.870Z","value":"7.1 HIGH (4.0)","meaning":"security-advisories@github.com severity; no combined Null risk score.","source_id":"sr-0fe4490b37805a62ae7be2947c236394"},{"kind":"EPSS","as_of":"2026-11-03T12:00:27.000Z","value":"0.354%","meaning":"FIRST EPSS model v2026.06.15; exploitation probability over 30 days, percentile 0.29113. Missing scores are unknown.","source_id":"sr-25d8a5df65740e43ac47fa580e9015ff"}],"why_it_matters":"Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.","related_sources":[{"id":"sr-81688a4194e311eb9456a9a5ff47b629","url":"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-737x-cwfr-5vvc","basis":"vendor_advisory","notes":"GitHub Advisory Database; CC-BY-4.0. Each advisory links its original attribution. Null normalizes fields.","title":"GHSA-737x-cwfr-5vvc","publisher":"GitHub Advisory Database","observed_at":"2026-10-31T22:07:08.657Z"},{"id":"sr-9cdb206f8adec7491ed8a02f019cc18a","url":"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-737x-cwfr-5vvc","basis":"vendor_advisory","notes":"GitHub-origin advisory, CC-BY-4.0; OSV is an aggregate copy, not independent corroboration.","title":"GHSA-737x-cwfr-5vvc","publisher":"GitHub Advisory Database via OSV","observed_at":"2026-11-05T19:03:55.174Z"},{"id":"sr-0fe4490b37805a62ae7be2947c236394","url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-115477","basis":"official_catalog","notes":"This product uses data from the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.","title":"CVE-2026-115477","publisher":"NIST National Vulnerability Database","observed_at":"2026-11-03T09:58:52.895Z"},{"id":"sr-25d8a5df65740e43ac47fa580e9015ff","url":"https://www.first.org/epss/data.html","basis":"official_catalog","notes":"FIRST EPSS; probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, not local compromise. Dataset date/model retained; FIRST services terms apply.","title":"CVE-2026-115477","publisher":"FIRST EPSS","observed_at":"2026-11-03T17:44:07.776Z"}],"affected_context":[{"certainty":"source_listed","source_ids":["sr-81688a4194e311eb9456a9a5ff47b629"],"technology":"obsidian-tc","known_exclusions":[],"conditions_summary":"### Summary\nOn a Streamable HTTP deployment with `auth.jwtSecret` configured, serving a 2026-07-28-era client that declared `elicitation.form` support, a call to a dispatch-gated tool (`destructive: true`, or a scope with an HITL floor) that was offered an `inputRequired` confirmation could still complete after the human declined, cancelled, or the elicitation response was omitted or malformed, provided the client echoed the validly bound `requestState` on resubmission. The server trusted an authentic, call-bound state as proof of approval; the state is minted before the elicitation leg is asked, so it proves only that the resubmission belongs to the same call.\n\n### Details\nReproduced directly: a `destructive: true` tool call, offered `inputRequired`, answered with `{action: \"decline\"}` on the `elicitation/create` leg, still wrote. Present since the 2026-07-28 round trip shipped in v1.13.0 (THE-583). Only dispatch-gated tools were reachable; the sixteen handler-side conditionally gated tools (`write_note` overwrite, `move_note`, and others) did not read the elicitation state on the modern wire at all, so they neither let a decline nor an approval through.\n\n### Impact\nA client that ","public_affected_ranges":[">= 1.13.0, <= 1.31.3"]},{"certainty":"source_listed","source_ids":["sr-9cdb206f8adec7491ed8a02f019cc18a"],"technology":"obsidian-tc","known_exclusions":[],"conditions_summary":"### Summary\nOn a Streamable HTTP deployment with `auth.jwtSecret` configured, serving a 2026-07-28-era client that declared `elicitation.form` support, a call to a dispatch-gated tool (`destructive: true`, or a scope with an HITL floor) that was offered an `inputRequired` confirmation could still complete after the human declined, cancelled, or the elicitation response was omitted or malformed, provided the client echoed the validly bound `requestState` on resubmission. The server trusted an authentic, call-bound state as proof of approval; the state is minted before the elicitation leg is asked, so it proves only that the resubmission belongs to the same call.\n\n### Details\nReproduced directly: a `destructive: true` tool call, offered `inputRequired`, answered with `{action: \"decline\"}` on the `elicitation/create` leg, still wrote. Present since the 2026-07-28 round trip shipped in v1.13.0 (THE-583). Only dispatch-gated tools were reachable; the sixteen handler-side conditionally gated tools (`write_note` overwrite, `move_note`, and others) did not read the elicitation state on the modern wire at all, so they neither let a decline nor an approval through.\n\n### Impact\nA client that ","public_affected_ranges":["SEMVER: introduced 1.13.0; fixed 1.31.4"]}],"null_published_at":"2026-11-08T19:53:33.597Z","source_updated_at":"2026-10-23T17:30:11.000Z","source_disclosed_at":"2026-10-23T17:30:10.000Z","is_synthetic_fixture":false,"null_last_reviewed_at":null,"public_change_summary":"Dated EPSS estimate updated; this is not a new disclosure or proof of exploitation.","null_first_observed_at":"2026-10-31T22:07:08.657Z"},{"id":"NVI-00010645","kind":"vulnerability","title":"obsidian-tc: Declined human-in-the-loop confirmations can permit destructive calls over HTTP","revision":5,"unknowns":["Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.","NVD lastModified does not establish freshness of every associated CPE record."],"lifecycle":"active","identifiers":["GHSA-737x-cwfr-5vvc","CVE-2026-115477"],"plain_summary":"GitHub lists this reviewed advisory for obsidian-tc. Published version ranges and source prerequisites are shown below; this is not an inspection of a visitor’s application.","review_status":"source_listed","control_topics":[],"public_actions":[{"summary":"Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.","source_ids":["sr-02443d5e9a3f567ea883c2e7d93a98c2"],"action_type":"investigate","limitations":"Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system.","current_supported_target":null},{"summary":"The original advisory lists fixed boundaries 1.31.4 for obsidian-tc. Confirm the publisher’s latest guidance.","source_ids":["sr-9cdb206f8adec7491ed8a02f019cc18a"],"action_type":"vendor_patch","limitations":"Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system.","current_supported_target":null}],"schema_version":"1.1.0","source_metrics":[{"kind":"CVSS","as_of":"2026-10-29T18:17:23.870Z","value":"7.1 HIGH (4.0)","meaning":"security-advisories@github.com severity; no combined Null risk score.","source_id":"sr-0fe4490b37805a62ae7be2947c236394"},{"kind":"EPSS","as_of":"2026-11-02T12:00:30.000Z","value":"0.354%","meaning":"FIRST EPSS model v2026.06.15; exploitation probability over 30 days, percentile 0.29064. Missing scores are unknown.","source_id":"sr-02443d5e9a3f567ea883c2e7d93a98c2"}],"why_it_matters":"Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.","related_sources":[{"id":"sr-81688a4194e311eb9456a9a5ff47b629","url":"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-737x-cwfr-5vvc","basis":"vendor_advisory","notes":"GitHub Advisory Database; CC-BY-4.0. Each advisory links its original attribution. Null normalizes fields.","title":"GHSA-737x-cwfr-5vvc","publisher":"GitHub Advisory Database","observed_at":"2026-10-31T22:07:08.657Z"},{"id":"sr-9cdb206f8adec7491ed8a02f019cc18a","url":"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-737x-cwfr-5vvc","basis":"vendor_advisory","notes":"GitHub-origin advisory, CC-BY-4.0; OSV is an aggregate copy, not independent corroboration.","title":"GHSA-737x-cwfr-5vvc","publisher":"GitHub Advisory Database via OSV","observed_at":"2026-11-05T19:03:55.174Z"},{"id":"sr-0fe4490b37805a62ae7be2947c236394","url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-115477","basis":"official_catalog","notes":"This product uses data from the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.","title":"CVE-2026-115477","publisher":"NIST National Vulnerability Database","observed_at":"2026-11-03T09:58:52.895Z"},{"id":"sr-02443d5e9a3f567ea883c2e7d93a98c2","url":"https://www.first.org/epss/data.html","basis":"official_catalog","notes":"FIRST EPSS; probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, not local compromise. Dataset date/model retained; FIRST services terms apply.","title":"CVE-2026-115477","publisher":"FIRST EPSS","observed_at":"2026-11-02T20:15:58.842Z"}],"affected_context":[{"certainty":"source_listed","source_ids":["sr-81688a4194e311eb9456a9a5ff47b629"],"technology":"obsidian-tc","known_exclusions":[],"conditions_summary":"### Summary\nOn a Streamable HTTP deployment with `auth.jwtSecret` configured, serving a 2026-07-28-era client that declared `elicitation.form` support, a call to a dispatch-gated tool (`destructive: true`, or a scope with an HITL floor) that was offered an `inputRequired` confirmation could still complete after the human declined, cancelled, or the elicitation response was omitted or malformed, provided the client echoed the validly bound `requestState` on resubmission. The server trusted an authentic, call-bound state as proof of approval; the state is minted before the elicitation leg is asked, so it proves only that the resubmission belongs to the same call.\n\n### Details\nReproduced directly: a `destructive: true` tool call, offered `inputRequired`, answered with `{action: \"decline\"}` on the `elicitation/create` leg, still wrote. Present since the 2026-07-28 round trip shipped in v1.13.0 (THE-583). Only dispatch-gated tools were reachable; the sixteen handler-side conditionally gated tools (`write_note` overwrite, `move_note`, and others) did not read the elicitation state on the modern wire at all, so they neither let a decline nor an approval through.\n\n### Impact\nA client that ","public_affected_ranges":[">= 1.13.0, <= 1.31.3"]},{"certainty":"source_listed","source_ids":["sr-9cdb206f8adec7491ed8a02f019cc18a"],"technology":"obsidian-tc","known_exclusions":[],"conditions_summary":"### Summary\nOn a Streamable HTTP deployment with `auth.jwtSecret` configured, serving a 2026-07-28-era client that declared `elicitation.form` support, a call to a dispatch-gated tool (`destructive: true`, or a scope with an HITL floor) that was offered an `inputRequired` confirmation could still complete after the human declined, cancelled, or the elicitation response was omitted or malformed, provided the client echoed the validly bound `requestState` on resubmission. The server trusted an authentic, call-bound state as proof of approval; the state is minted before the elicitation leg is asked, so it proves only that the resubmission belongs to the same call.\n\n### Details\nReproduced directly: a `destructive: true` tool call, offered `inputRequired`, answered with `{action: \"decline\"}` on the `elicitation/create` leg, still wrote. Present since the 2026-07-28 round trip shipped in v1.13.0 (THE-583). Only dispatch-gated tools were reachable; the sixteen handler-side conditionally gated tools (`write_note` overwrite, `move_note`, and others) did not read the elicitation state on the modern wire at all, so they neither let a decline nor an approval through.\n\n### Impact\nA client that ","public_affected_ranges":["SEMVER: introduced 1.13.0; fixed 1.31.4"]}],"null_published_at":"2026-11-07T00:57:04.326Z","source_updated_at":"2026-10-23T17:30:11.000Z","source_disclosed_at":"2026-10-23T17:30:10.000Z","is_synthetic_fixture":false,"null_last_reviewed_at":null,"public_change_summary":"Source facts changed; compare the preserved prior revision.","null_first_observed_at":"2026-10-31T22:07:08.657Z"},{"id":"NVI-00010645","kind":"vulnerability","title":"obsidian-tc: Declined human-in-the-loop confirmations can permit destructive calls over HTTP","revision":4,"unknowns":["Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.","NVD lastModified does not establish freshness of every associated CPE record."],"lifecycle":"active","identifiers":["GHSA-737x-cwfr-5vvc","CVE-2026-115477"],"plain_summary":"GitHub lists this reviewed advisory for obsidian-tc. Published version ranges and source prerequisites are shown below; this is not an inspection of a visitor’s application.","review_status":"source_listed","control_topics":[],"public_actions":[{"summary":"Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.","source_ids":["sr-02443d5e9a3f567ea883c2e7d93a98c2"],"action_type":"investigate","limitations":"Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system.","current_supported_target":null}],"schema_version":"1.1.0","source_metrics":[{"kind":"CVSS","as_of":"2026-10-29T18:17:23.870Z","value":"7.1 HIGH (4.0)","meaning":"security-advisories@github.com severity; no combined Null risk score.","source_id":"sr-0fe4490b37805a62ae7be2947c236394"},{"kind":"EPSS","as_of":"2026-11-02T12:00:30.000Z","value":"0.354%","meaning":"FIRST EPSS model v2026.06.15; exploitation probability over 30 days, percentile 0.29064. Missing scores are unknown.","source_id":"sr-02443d5e9a3f567ea883c2e7d93a98c2"}],"why_it_matters":"Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.","related_sources":[{"id":"sr-81688a4194e311eb9456a9a5ff47b629","url":"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-737x-cwfr-5vvc","basis":"vendor_advisory","notes":"GitHub Advisory Database; CC-BY-4.0. Each advisory links its original attribution. Null normalizes fields.","title":"GHSA-737x-cwfr-5vvc","publisher":"GitHub Advisory Database","observed_at":"2026-10-31T22:07:08.657Z"},{"id":"sr-0fe4490b37805a62ae7be2947c236394","url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-115477","basis":"official_catalog","notes":"This product uses data from the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.","title":"CVE-2026-115477","publisher":"NIST National Vulnerability Database","observed_at":"2026-11-03T09:58:52.895Z"},{"id":"sr-02443d5e9a3f567ea883c2e7d93a98c2","url":"https://www.first.org/epss/data.html","basis":"official_catalog","notes":"FIRST EPSS; probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, not local compromise. Dataset date/model retained; FIRST services terms apply.","title":"CVE-2026-115477","publisher":"FIRST EPSS","observed_at":"2026-11-02T20:15:58.842Z"}],"affected_context":[{"certainty":"source_listed","source_ids":["sr-81688a4194e311eb9456a9a5ff47b629"],"technology":"obsidian-tc","known_exclusions":[],"conditions_summary":"### Summary\nOn a Streamable HTTP deployment with `auth.jwtSecret` configured, serving a 2026-07-28-era client that declared `elicitation.form` support, a call to a dispatch-gated tool (`destructive: true`, or a scope with an HITL floor) that was offered an `inputRequired` confirmation could still complete after the human declined, cancelled, or the elicitation response was omitted or malformed, provided the client echoed the validly bound `requestState` on resubmission. The server trusted an authentic, call-bound state as proof of approval; the state is minted before the elicitation leg is asked, so it proves only that the resubmission belongs to the same call.\n\n### Details\nReproduced directly: a `destructive: true` tool call, offered `inputRequired`, answered with `{action: \"decline\"}` on the `elicitation/create` leg, still wrote. Present since the 2026-07-28 round trip shipped in v1.13.0 (THE-583). Only dispatch-gated tools were reachable; the sixteen handler-side conditionally gated tools (`write_note` overwrite, `move_note`, and others) did not read the elicitation state on the modern wire at all, so they neither let a decline nor an approval through.\n\n### Impact\nA client that ","public_affected_ranges":[">= 1.13.0, <= 1.31.3"]}],"null_published_at":"2026-11-03T17:49:14.986Z","source_updated_at":"2026-10-23T17:30:11.000Z","source_disclosed_at":"2026-10-23T17:30:10.000Z","is_synthetic_fixture":false,"null_last_reviewed_at":null,"public_change_summary":"Dated EPSS estimate updated; this is not a new disclosure or proof of exploitation.","null_first_observed_at":"2026-10-31T22:07:08.657Z"},{"id":"NVI-00010645","kind":"vulnerability","title":"obsidian-tc: Declined human-in-the-loop confirmations can permit destructive calls over HTTP","revision":3,"unknowns":["Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.","NVD lastModified does not establish freshness of every associated CPE record."],"lifecycle":"active","identifiers":["GHSA-737x-cwfr-5vvc","CVE-2026-115477"],"plain_summary":"GitHub lists this reviewed advisory for obsidian-tc. Published version ranges and source prerequisites are shown below; this is not an inspection of a visitor’s application.","review_status":"source_listed","control_topics":[],"public_actions":[{"summary":"Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.","source_ids":["sr-0c75d217f26d2fca51d766ab2050d5de"],"action_type":"investigate","limitations":"Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system.","current_supported_target":null}],"schema_version":"1.1.0","source_metrics":[{"kind":"CVSS","as_of":"2026-10-29T18:17:23.870Z","value":"7.1 HIGH (4.0)","meaning":"security-advisories@github.com severity; no combined Null risk score.","source_id":"sr-0fe4490b37805a62ae7be2947c236394"},{"kind":"EPSS","as_of":"2026-10-31T12:00:27.000Z","value":"0.354%","meaning":"FIRST EPSS model v2026.06.15; exploitation probability over 30 days, percentile 0.29078. Missing scores are unknown.","source_id":"sr-0c75d217f26d2fca51d766ab2050d5de"}],"why_it_matters":"Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.","related_sources":[{"id":"sr-81688a4194e311eb9456a9a5ff47b629","url":"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-737x-cwfr-5vvc","basis":"vendor_advisory","notes":"GitHub Advisory Database; CC-BY-4.0. Each advisory links its original attribution. Null normalizes fields.","title":"GHSA-737x-cwfr-5vvc","publisher":"GitHub Advisory Database","observed_at":"2026-10-31T22:07:08.657Z"},{"id":"sr-0fe4490b37805a62ae7be2947c236394","url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-115477","basis":"official_catalog","notes":"This product uses data from the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.","title":"CVE-2026-115477","publisher":"NIST National Vulnerability Database","observed_at":"2026-11-03T09:58:52.895Z"},{"id":"sr-0c75d217f26d2fca51d766ab2050d5de","url":"https://www.first.org/epss/data.html","basis":"official_catalog","notes":"FIRST EPSS; probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, not local compromise. Dataset date/model retained; FIRST services terms apply.","title":"CVE-2026-115477","publisher":"FIRST EPSS","observed_at":"2026-10-31T23:13:27.689Z"}],"affected_context":[{"certainty":"source_listed","source_ids":["sr-81688a4194e311eb9456a9a5ff47b629"],"technology":"obsidian-tc","known_exclusions":[],"conditions_summary":"### Summary\nOn a Streamable HTTP deployment with `auth.jwtSecret` configured, serving a 2026-07-28-era client that declared `elicitation.form` support, a call to a dispatch-gated tool (`destructive: true`, or a scope with an HITL floor) that was offered an `inputRequired` confirmation could still complete after the human declined, cancelled, or the elicitation response was omitted or malformed, provided the client echoed the validly bound `requestState` on resubmission. The server trusted an authentic, call-bound state as proof of approval; the state is minted before the elicitation leg is asked, so it proves only that the resubmission belongs to the same call.\n\n### Details\nReproduced directly: a `destructive: true` tool call, offered `inputRequired`, answered with `{action: \"decline\"}` on the `elicitation/create` leg, still wrote. Present since the 2026-07-28 round trip shipped in v1.13.0 (THE-583). Only dispatch-gated tools were reachable; the sixteen handler-side conditionally gated tools (`write_note` overwrite, `move_note`, and others) did not read the elicitation state on the modern wire at all, so they neither let a decline nor an approval through.\n\n### Impact\nA client that ","public_affected_ranges":[">= 1.13.0, <= 1.31.3"]}],"null_published_at":"2026-11-03T10:03:31.370Z","source_updated_at":"2026-10-23T17:30:11.000Z","source_disclosed_at":"2026-10-23T17:30:10.000Z","is_synthetic_fixture":false,"null_last_reviewed_at":null,"public_change_summary":"Source facts changed; compare the preserved prior revision.","null_first_observed_at":"2026-10-31T22:07:08.657Z"},{"id":"NVI-00010645","kind":"vulnerability","title":"obsidian-tc: Declined human-in-the-loop confirmations can permit destructive calls over HTTP","revision":2,"unknowns":["Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected."],"lifecycle":"active","identifiers":["GHSA-737x-cwfr-5vvc","CVE-2026-115477"],"plain_summary":"GitHub lists this reviewed advisory for obsidian-tc. Published version ranges and source prerequisites are shown below; this is not an inspection of a visitor’s application.","review_status":"source_listed","control_topics":[],"public_actions":[{"summary":"Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.","source_ids":["sr-0c75d217f26d2fca51d766ab2050d5de"],"action_type":"investigate","limitations":"Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system.","current_supported_target":null}],"schema_version":"1.1.0","source_metrics":[{"kind":"EPSS","as_of":"2026-10-31T12:00:27.000Z","value":"0.354%","meaning":"FIRST EPSS model v2026.06.15; exploitation probability over 30 days, percentile 0.29078. Missing scores are unknown.","source_id":"sr-0c75d217f26d2fca51d766ab2050d5de"}],"why_it_matters":"Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.","related_sources":[{"id":"sr-81688a4194e311eb9456a9a5ff47b629","url":"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-737x-cwfr-5vvc","basis":"vendor_advisory","notes":"GitHub Advisory Database; CC-BY-4.0. Each advisory links its original attribution. Null normalizes fields.","title":"GHSA-737x-cwfr-5vvc","publisher":"GitHub Advisory Database","observed_at":"2026-10-31T22:07:08.657Z"},{"id":"sr-0c75d217f26d2fca51d766ab2050d5de","url":"https://www.first.org/epss/data.html","basis":"official_catalog","notes":"FIRST EPSS; probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, not local compromise. Dataset date/model retained; FIRST services terms apply.","title":"CVE-2026-115477","publisher":"FIRST EPSS","observed_at":"2026-10-31T23:13:27.689Z"}],"affected_context":[{"certainty":"source_listed","source_ids":["sr-81688a4194e311eb9456a9a5ff47b629"],"technology":"obsidian-tc","known_exclusions":[],"conditions_summary":"### Summary\nOn a Streamable HTTP deployment with `auth.jwtSecret` configured, serving a 2026-07-28-era client that declared `elicitation.form` support, a call to a dispatch-gated tool (`destructive: true`, or a scope with an HITL floor) that was offered an `inputRequired` confirmation could still complete after the human declined, cancelled, or the elicitation response was omitted or malformed, provided the client echoed the validly bound `requestState` on resubmission. The server trusted an authentic, call-bound state as proof of approval; the state is minted before the elicitation leg is asked, so it proves only that the resubmission belongs to the same call.\n\n### Details\nReproduced directly: a `destructive: true` tool call, offered `inputRequired`, answered with `{action: \"decline\"}` on the `elicitation/create` leg, still wrote. Present since the 2026-07-28 round trip shipped in v1.13.0 (THE-583). Only dispatch-gated tools were reachable; the sixteen handler-side conditionally gated tools (`write_note` overwrite, `move_note`, and others) did not read the elicitation state on the modern wire at all, so they neither let a decline nor an approval through.\n\n### Impact\nA client that ","public_affected_ranges":[">= 1.13.0, <= 1.31.3"]}],"null_published_at":"2026-10-31T23:18:22.439Z","source_updated_at":"2026-10-23T17:30:11.000Z","source_disclosed_at":"2026-10-23T17:30:10.000Z","is_synthetic_fixture":false,"null_last_reviewed_at":null,"public_change_summary":"Dated EPSS estimate updated; this is not a new disclosure or proof of exploitation.","null_first_observed_at":"2026-10-31T22:07:08.657Z"},{"id":"NVI-00010645","kind":"vulnerability","title":"obsidian-tc: Declined human-in-the-loop confirmations can permit destructive calls over HTTP","revision":1,"unknowns":["Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected."],"lifecycle":"active","identifiers":["GHSA-737x-cwfr-5vvc","CVE-2026-115477"],"plain_summary":"GitHub lists this reviewed advisory for obsidian-tc. Published version ranges and source prerequisites are shown below; this is not an inspection of a visitor’s application.","review_status":"source_listed","control_topics":[],"public_actions":[{"summary":"Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.","source_ids":["sr-81688a4194e311eb9456a9a5ff47b629"],"action_type":"investigate","limitations":"Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system.","current_supported_target":null}],"schema_version":"1.1.0","source_metrics":[],"why_it_matters":"Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.","related_sources":[{"id":"sr-81688a4194e311eb9456a9a5ff47b629","url":"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-737x-cwfr-5vvc","basis":"vendor_advisory","notes":"GitHub Advisory Database; CC-BY-4.0. Each advisory links its original attribution. Null normalizes fields.","title":"GHSA-737x-cwfr-5vvc","publisher":"GitHub Advisory Database","observed_at":"2026-10-31T22:07:08.657Z"}],"affected_context":[{"certainty":"source_listed","source_ids":["sr-81688a4194e311eb9456a9a5ff47b629"],"technology":"obsidian-tc","known_exclusions":[],"conditions_summary":"### Summary\nOn a Streamable HTTP deployment with `auth.jwtSecret` configured, serving a 2026-07-28-era client that declared `elicitation.form` support, a call to a dispatch-gated tool (`destructive: true`, or a scope with an HITL floor) that was offered an `inputRequired` confirmation could still complete after the human declined, cancelled, or the elicitation response was omitted or malformed, provided the client echoed the validly bound `requestState` on resubmission. The server trusted an authentic, call-bound state as proof of approval; the state is minted before the elicitation leg is asked, so it proves only that the resubmission belongs to the same call.\n\n### Details\nReproduced directly: a `destructive: true` tool call, offered `inputRequired`, answered with `{action: \"decline\"}` on the `elicitation/create` leg, still wrote. Present since the 2026-07-28 round trip shipped in v1.13.0 (THE-583). Only dispatch-gated tools were reachable; the sixteen handler-side conditionally gated tools (`write_note` overwrite, `move_note`, and others) did not read the elicitation state on the modern wire at all, so they neither let a decline nor an approval through.\n\n### Impact\nA client that ","public_affected_ranges":[">= 1.13.0, <= 1.31.3"]}],"null_published_at":"2026-10-31T22:27:09.627Z","source_updated_at":"2026-10-23T17:30:11.000Z","source_disclosed_at":"2026-10-23T17:30:10.000Z","is_synthetic_fixture":false,"null_last_reviewed_at":null,"public_change_summary":"First indexed by Null; source disclosure date is shown separately.","null_first_observed_at":"2026-10-31T22:07:08.657Z"}],"next_cursor":null,"snapshot_revision":"42594"}