{"items":[{"id":"NVI-00016207","kind":"vulnerability","title":"jackson-databind: @JsonIgnore on a Record property is bypassed with a PropertyNamingStrategy","revision":2,"unknowns":["Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected."],"lifecycle":"active","identifiers":["GHSA-3pjw-73gf-8qr5","CVE-2026-59888"],"plain_summary":"GitHub lists this reviewed advisory for com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind, com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind, tools.jackson.core:jackson-databind. Published version ranges and source prerequisites are shown below; this is not an inspection of a visitor’s application.","review_status":"source_listed","control_topics":[],"public_actions":[{"summary":"Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.","source_ids":["sr-08b65919fb8433a6e438055bda09005f"],"action_type":"investigate","limitations":"Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system.","current_supported_target":null}],"schema_version":"1.1.0","source_metrics":[{"kind":"CVSS","as_of":"2026-07-21T19:33:07.000Z","value":"6.5 medium","meaning":"GitHub source severity; exploitability and local consequence require separate evidence.","source_id":"sr-46a404b2303453d88eb5093918b00d05"},{"kind":"EPSS","as_of":"2026-11-05T12:03:04.000Z","value":"0.423%","meaning":"FIRST EPSS model v2026.06.15; exploitation probability over 30 days, percentile 0.36806. Missing scores are unknown.","source_id":"sr-08b65919fb8433a6e438055bda09005f"}],"why_it_matters":"Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.","related_sources":[{"id":"sr-46a404b2303453d88eb5093918b00d05","url":"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-3pjw-73gf-8qr5","basis":"vendor_advisory","notes":"GitHub Advisory Database; CC-BY-4.0. Each advisory links its original attribution. Null normalizes fields.","title":"GHSA-3pjw-73gf-8qr5","publisher":"GitHub Advisory Database","observed_at":"2026-11-03T22:34:39.734Z"},{"id":"sr-08b65919fb8433a6e438055bda09005f","url":"https://www.first.org/epss/data.html","basis":"official_catalog","notes":"FIRST EPSS; probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, not local compromise. Dataset date/model retained; FIRST services terms apply.","title":"CVE-2026-59888","publisher":"FIRST EPSS","observed_at":"2026-11-06T07:17:46.390Z"}],"affected_context":[{"certainty":"source_listed","source_ids":["sr-46a404b2303453d88eb5093918b00d05"],"technology":"com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind","known_exclusions":[],"conditions_summary":"## Summary\nFor Java Records, `POJOPropertiesCollector._removeUnwantedIgnorals()` records a `@JsonIgnore`-annotated component under its original implicit name before `_renameUsing()` applies the `PropertyNamingStrategy`. After the rename, `_ignoredPropertyNames` still holds only the pre-rename name, so `_ignorableProps` is built from the stale key. The renamed JSON key passes `IgnorePropertiesUtil.shouldIgnore()` and is assigned to the Record's constructor parameter, defeating the `@JsonIgnore`.\n\n## Impact\nA Record using a naming strategy that relies on `@JsonIgnore` to keep an internal/privileged component out of deserialization can have that component set from the wire via its renamed key (e.g. a role/flag controlled by an untrusted client).\n\n## Affected / Patched (verified via `git tag --contains`)\n- 2.15-2.18 line: `>= 2.15.0,  fixed in **2.18.8** (backport `c7c6783`)\n- 2.19-2.21 line: `>= 2.19.0,  fixed in **2.21.4**\n- 3.x line: `>= 3.0.0,  fixed in **3.1.4** (#5974, `baa2cdf`)\n\n## Severity / CWE\nMaintainer: minor. Reporter: Moderate. CWE-915; related CWE-345.\n\n## Credits\nOmkhar Arasaratnam (@omkhar) - finder.","public_affected_ranges":[">= 2.15.0, < 2.18.8"]},{"certainty":"source_listed","source_ids":["sr-46a404b2303453d88eb5093918b00d05"],"technology":"com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind","known_exclusions":[],"conditions_summary":"## Summary\nFor Java Records, `POJOPropertiesCollector._removeUnwantedIgnorals()` records a `@JsonIgnore`-annotated component under its original implicit name before `_renameUsing()` applies the `PropertyNamingStrategy`. After the rename, `_ignoredPropertyNames` still holds only the pre-rename name, so `_ignorableProps` is built from the stale key. The renamed JSON key passes `IgnorePropertiesUtil.shouldIgnore()` and is assigned to the Record's constructor parameter, defeating the `@JsonIgnore`.\n\n## Impact\nA Record using a naming strategy that relies on `@JsonIgnore` to keep an internal/privileged component out of deserialization can have that component set from the wire via its renamed key (e.g. a role/flag controlled by an untrusted client).\n\n## Affected / Patched (verified via `git tag --contains`)\n- 2.15-2.18 line: `>= 2.15.0,  fixed in **2.18.8** (backport `c7c6783`)\n- 2.19-2.21 line: `>= 2.19.0,  fixed in **2.21.4**\n- 3.x line: `>= 3.0.0,  fixed in **3.1.4** (#5974, `baa2cdf`)\n\n## Severity / CWE\nMaintainer: minor. Reporter: Moderate. CWE-915; related CWE-345.\n\n## Credits\nOmkhar Arasaratnam (@omkhar) - finder.","public_affected_ranges":[">= 2.19.0, < 2.21.4"]},{"certainty":"source_listed","source_ids":["sr-46a404b2303453d88eb5093918b00d05"],"technology":"tools.jackson.core:jackson-databind","known_exclusions":[],"conditions_summary":"## Summary\nFor Java Records, `POJOPropertiesCollector._removeUnwantedIgnorals()` records a `@JsonIgnore`-annotated component under its original implicit name before `_renameUsing()` applies the `PropertyNamingStrategy`. After the rename, `_ignoredPropertyNames` still holds only the pre-rename name, so `_ignorableProps` is built from the stale key. The renamed JSON key passes `IgnorePropertiesUtil.shouldIgnore()` and is assigned to the Record's constructor parameter, defeating the `@JsonIgnore`.\n\n## Impact\nA Record using a naming strategy that relies on `@JsonIgnore` to keep an internal/privileged component out of deserialization can have that component set from the wire via its renamed key (e.g. a role/flag controlled by an untrusted client).\n\n## Affected / Patched (verified via `git tag --contains`)\n- 2.15-2.18 line: `>= 2.15.0,  fixed in **2.18.8** (backport `c7c6783`)\n- 2.19-2.21 line: `>= 2.19.0,  fixed in **2.21.4**\n- 3.x line: `>= 3.0.0,  fixed in **3.1.4** (#5974, `baa2cdf`)\n\n## Severity / CWE\nMaintainer: minor. Reporter: Moderate. CWE-915; related CWE-345.\n\n## Credits\nOmkhar Arasaratnam (@omkhar) - finder.","public_affected_ranges":[">= 3.0.0, < 3.1.4"]}],"null_published_at":"2026-11-08T15:11:49.411Z","source_updated_at":"2026-07-21T19:33:07.000Z","source_disclosed_at":"2026-07-21T19:33:06.000Z","is_synthetic_fixture":false,"null_last_reviewed_at":null,"public_change_summary":"Dated EPSS estimate updated; this is not a new disclosure or proof of exploitation.","null_first_observed_at":"2026-11-03T22:34:39.734Z"},{"id":"NVI-00016207","kind":"vulnerability","title":"jackson-databind: @JsonIgnore on a Record property is bypassed with a PropertyNamingStrategy","revision":1,"unknowns":["Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected."],"lifecycle":"active","identifiers":["GHSA-3pjw-73gf-8qr5","CVE-2026-59888"],"plain_summary":"GitHub lists this reviewed advisory for com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind, com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind, tools.jackson.core:jackson-databind. Published version ranges and source prerequisites are shown below; this is not an inspection of a visitor’s application.","review_status":"source_listed","control_topics":[],"public_actions":[{"summary":"Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.","source_ids":["sr-46a404b2303453d88eb5093918b00d05"],"action_type":"investigate","limitations":"Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system.","current_supported_target":null}],"schema_version":"1.1.0","source_metrics":[{"kind":"CVSS","as_of":"2026-07-21T19:33:07.000Z","value":"6.5 medium","meaning":"GitHub source severity; exploitability and local consequence require separate evidence.","source_id":"sr-46a404b2303453d88eb5093918b00d05"}],"why_it_matters":"Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.","related_sources":[{"id":"sr-46a404b2303453d88eb5093918b00d05","url":"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-3pjw-73gf-8qr5","basis":"vendor_advisory","notes":"GitHub Advisory Database; CC-BY-4.0. Each advisory links its original attribution. Null normalizes fields.","title":"GHSA-3pjw-73gf-8qr5","publisher":"GitHub Advisory Database","observed_at":"2026-11-03T22:34:39.734Z"}],"affected_context":[{"certainty":"source_listed","source_ids":["sr-46a404b2303453d88eb5093918b00d05"],"technology":"com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind","known_exclusions":[],"conditions_summary":"## Summary\nFor Java Records, `POJOPropertiesCollector._removeUnwantedIgnorals()` records a `@JsonIgnore`-annotated component under its original implicit name before `_renameUsing()` applies the `PropertyNamingStrategy`. After the rename, `_ignoredPropertyNames` still holds only the pre-rename name, so `_ignorableProps` is built from the stale key. The renamed JSON key passes `IgnorePropertiesUtil.shouldIgnore()` and is assigned to the Record's constructor parameter, defeating the `@JsonIgnore`.\n\n## Impact\nA Record using a naming strategy that relies on `@JsonIgnore` to keep an internal/privileged component out of deserialization can have that component set from the wire via its renamed key (e.g. a role/flag controlled by an untrusted client).\n\n## Affected / Patched (verified via `git tag --contains`)\n- 2.15-2.18 line: `>= 2.15.0,  fixed in **2.18.8** (backport `c7c6783`)\n- 2.19-2.21 line: `>= 2.19.0,  fixed in **2.21.4**\n- 3.x line: `>= 3.0.0,  fixed in **3.1.4** (#5974, `baa2cdf`)\n\n## Severity / CWE\nMaintainer: minor. Reporter: Moderate. CWE-915; related CWE-345.\n\n## Credits\nOmkhar Arasaratnam (@omkhar) - finder.","public_affected_ranges":[">= 2.15.0, < 2.18.8"]},{"certainty":"source_listed","source_ids":["sr-46a404b2303453d88eb5093918b00d05"],"technology":"com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind","known_exclusions":[],"conditions_summary":"## Summary\nFor Java Records, `POJOPropertiesCollector._removeUnwantedIgnorals()` records a `@JsonIgnore`-annotated component under its original implicit name before `_renameUsing()` applies the `PropertyNamingStrategy`. After the rename, `_ignoredPropertyNames` still holds only the pre-rename name, so `_ignorableProps` is built from the stale key. The renamed JSON key passes `IgnorePropertiesUtil.shouldIgnore()` and is assigned to the Record's constructor parameter, defeating the `@JsonIgnore`.\n\n## Impact\nA Record using a naming strategy that relies on `@JsonIgnore` to keep an internal/privileged component out of deserialization can have that component set from the wire via its renamed key (e.g. a role/flag controlled by an untrusted client).\n\n## Affected / Patched (verified via `git tag --contains`)\n- 2.15-2.18 line: `>= 2.15.0,  fixed in **2.18.8** (backport `c7c6783`)\n- 2.19-2.21 line: `>= 2.19.0,  fixed in **2.21.4**\n- 3.x line: `>= 3.0.0,  fixed in **3.1.4** (#5974, `baa2cdf`)\n\n## Severity / CWE\nMaintainer: minor. Reporter: Moderate. CWE-915; related CWE-345.\n\n## Credits\nOmkhar Arasaratnam (@omkhar) - finder.","public_affected_ranges":[">= 2.19.0, < 2.21.4"]},{"certainty":"source_listed","source_ids":["sr-46a404b2303453d88eb5093918b00d05"],"technology":"tools.jackson.core:jackson-databind","known_exclusions":[],"conditions_summary":"## Summary\nFor Java Records, `POJOPropertiesCollector._removeUnwantedIgnorals()` records a `@JsonIgnore`-annotated component under its original implicit name before `_renameUsing()` applies the `PropertyNamingStrategy`. After the rename, `_ignoredPropertyNames` still holds only the pre-rename name, so `_ignorableProps` is built from the stale key. The renamed JSON key passes `IgnorePropertiesUtil.shouldIgnore()` and is assigned to the Record's constructor parameter, defeating the `@JsonIgnore`.\n\n## Impact\nA Record using a naming strategy that relies on `@JsonIgnore` to keep an internal/privileged component out of deserialization can have that component set from the wire via its renamed key (e.g. a role/flag controlled by an untrusted client).\n\n## Affected / Patched (verified via `git tag --contains`)\n- 2.15-2.18 line: `>= 2.15.0,  fixed in **2.18.8** (backport `c7c6783`)\n- 2.19-2.21 line: `>= 2.19.0,  fixed in **2.21.4**\n- 3.x line: `>= 3.0.0,  fixed in **3.1.4** (#5974, `baa2cdf`)\n\n## Severity / CWE\nMaintainer: minor. Reporter: Moderate. CWE-915; related CWE-345.\n\n## Credits\nOmkhar Arasaratnam (@omkhar) - finder.","public_affected_ranges":[">= 3.0.0, < 3.1.4"]}],"null_published_at":"2026-11-04T10:04:27.918Z","source_updated_at":"2026-07-21T19:33:07.000Z","source_disclosed_at":"2026-07-21T19:33:06.000Z","is_synthetic_fixture":false,"null_last_reviewed_at":null,"public_change_summary":"First indexed by Null; source disclosure date is shown separately.","null_first_observed_at":"2026-11-03T22:34:39.734Z"}],"next_cursor":null,"snapshot_revision":"42594"}