By Null Ventures MCP platform
Menu

vulnerability / NVI-00002327 / Revision 5

AVideo has an Open Redirect via Unvalidated redirectUri in userLogin.php

OSV carries this publisher advisory for wwbn/avideo. This is an aggregated source copy; consult the original publisher and compare update dates.

source listedactiveGHSA-hj5h-5623-gwhwCVE-2026-33296

This report has not inspected your inventory, configuration, deployed build, reachability or evidence. A catalog listing and a severity score do not establish exposure or compromise.

01 / Meaning

Why it matters

Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.

EPSS

0.193%

FIRST EPSS model v2026.06.15; exploitation probability over 30 days, percentile 0.0912. Missing scores are unknown.

As of · FIRST EPSS

02 / Applicability

The affected context

Affected versions, configuration prerequisites and known exclusions are public. Confirm each one against the deployed service.

wwbn/avideo

source listed
  • ECOSYSTEM: introduced 0; last_affected 25.0

### Summary WWBN/AVideo contains an open redirect vulnerability in the login flow where a user-supplied redirectUri parameter is reflected directly into a JavaScript `document.location` assignment without JavaScript-safe encoding. After a user completes the login popup flow, a timer callback executes the redirect using the unvalidated value, sending the victim to an attacker-controlled site. ### Details In `view/userLogin.php`, the application accepts a redirectUri GET parameter, passes it through a function called `isSafeRedirectURL()`, and stores the result in $safeRedirectUri. This value is then embedded into an inline JavaScript block: ```php var logintimer = setInterval(function() { if (win.closed) { clearInterval(logintimer); document.location = ""; } }, 1000); ``` The value is printed directly into a JavaScript string literal with no call to `json_encode()`, `htmlspecialchars()`, or any JavaScript-context escaping. Even if `isSafeRedirectURL()` is intended to filter dangerous values, protocol-relative URLs such as `//evil.com` satisfy many naive URL validation checks because they carry no explicit scheme, yet brows

GitHub Advisory Database via OSV

03 / Response

What to do next

  1. investigate

    Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.

    Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. FIRST EPSS

A fixed release is not deployment evidence.

Check current vendor support and compatibility. After making a change, verify the deployed build and relevant runtime conditions. Keep the evidence, owner and time. An updated lockfile alone does not prove what is running.

04 / Limits

What this report cannot establish

  • Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.
  • NVD lastModified does not establish freshness of every associated CPE record.
Read the collection and interpretation limits ↗

05 / Provenance

Sources you can inspect

Each assertion retains its source. Mirrored records may repeat one underlying publisher; additional links are not independent corroboration.

  1. GHSA-hj5h-5623-gwhw ↗

    GitHub Advisory Database via OSV · vendor advisory

    Observed . GitHub-origin advisory, CC-BY-4.0; OSV is an aggregate copy, not independent corroboration.

  2. CVE-2026-33296 ↗

    NIST National Vulnerability Database · official catalog

    Observed . This product uses data from the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.

  3. CVE-2026-33296 ↗

    FIRST EPSS · official catalog

    Observed . FIRST EPSS; probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, not local compromise. Dataset date/model retained; FIRST services terms apply.

Public revision history

Only published revisions appear here. Routine fetches do not create a material-change event.

  1. Revision 5 ·

    Dated EPSS estimate updated; this is not a new disclosure or proof of exploitation.

  2. Revision 4 ·

    Dated EPSS estimate updated; this is not a new disclosure or proof of exploitation.

  3. Revision 3 ·

    Source facts changed; compare the preserved prior revision.

  4. Revision 2 ·

    Dated EPSS estimate updated; this is not a new disclosure or proof of exploitation.

  5. Revision 1 ·

    First indexed by Null; source disclosure date is shown separately.

Read the public revision data ↗

The next step is private

Bring the question into your environment.

The connected workflow is a development preview for inventory, contextual matching, owner decisions and evidence-based verification. No system-specific result is generated by this page.

See the synthetic workflow preview ↗