vulnerability / NVI-00002347 / Revision 4
Froxlor has a BIND Zone File Injection via Unsanitized DNS Record Content in DomainZones::add()
OSV carries this publisher advisory for froxlor/froxlor. This is an aggregated source copy; consult the original publisher and compare update dates.
This report has not inspected your inventory, configuration, deployed build, reachability or evidence. A catalog listing and a severity score do not establish exposure or compromise.
01 / Meaning
Why it matters
Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.
8.5 HIGH (3.1)
security-advisories@github.com severity; no combined Null risk score.
0.347%
FIRST EPSS model v2026.06.15; exploitation probability over 30 days, percentile 0.28294. Missing scores are unknown.
As of · FIRST EPSS
02 / Applicability
The affected context
Affected versions, configuration prerequisites and known exclusions are public. Confirm each one against the deployed service.
froxlor/froxlor
source listedECOSYSTEM: introduced 0; fixed 2.3.6
## Summary `DomainZones::add()` accepts arbitrary DNS record types without a whitelist and does not sanitize newline characters in the `content` field. When a DNS type not covered by the if/elseif validation chain is submitted (e.g., `NAPTR`, `PTR`, `HINFO`), content validation is entirely bypassed. Embedded newline characters in the content survive `trim()` processing, are stored in the database, and are written directly into BIND zone files via `DnsEntry::__toString()`. An authenticated customer can inject arbitrary DNS records and BIND directives (`$INCLUDE`, `$ORIGIN`, `$GENERATE`) into their domain's zone file. ## Details **Missing type whitelist — `DomainZones.php:93`:** The `type` parameter is accepted directly from user input with no validation against allowed values: ```php // lib/Froxlor/Api/Commands/DomainZones.php:93 $type = $this->getParam('type', true, 'A'); ``` The if/elseif chain at lines 170-317 validates content only for 13 known types: `A`, `AAAA`, `CAA`, `CNAME`, `DNAME`, `LOC`, `MX`, `NS`, `RP`, `SRV`, `SSHFP`, `TLSA`, `TXT`. Any type not in this list falls through with no content validation at all. There is a `TODO` comment at line 148 acknowledging miss
03 / Response
What to do next
- vendor patch
The original advisory lists fixed boundaries 2.3.6 for froxlor/froxlor. Confirm the publisher’s latest guidance.
Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. GitHub Advisory Database via OSV
- investigate
Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.
Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. FIRST EPSS
A fixed release is not deployment evidence.
Check current vendor support and compatibility. After making a change, verify the deployed build and relevant runtime conditions. Keep the evidence, owner and time. An updated lockfile alone does not prove what is running.
04 / Limits
What this report cannot establish
- Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.
- NVD lastModified does not establish freshness of every associated CPE record.
05 / Provenance
Sources you can inspect
Each assertion retains its source. Mirrored records may repeat one underlying publisher; additional links are not independent corroboration.
- GHSA-47hf-23pw-3m8c ↗
GitHub Advisory Database via OSV · vendor advisory
Observed . GitHub-origin advisory, CC-BY-4.0; OSV is an aggregate copy, not independent corroboration.
- CVE-2026-41230 ↗
NIST National Vulnerability Database · official catalog
Observed . This product uses data from the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
- CVE-2026-41230 ↗
FIRST EPSS · official catalog
Observed . FIRST EPSS; probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, not local compromise. Dataset date/model retained; FIRST services terms apply.
Public revision history
Only published revisions appear here. Routine fetches do not create a material-change event.
- Revision 4 ·
Source facts changed; compare the preserved prior revision.
- Revision 3 ·
Dated EPSS estimate updated; this is not a new disclosure or proof of exploitation.
- Revision 2 ·
Dated EPSS estimate updated; this is not a new disclosure or proof of exploitation.
- Revision 1 ·
First indexed by Null; source disclosure date is shown separately.