By Null Ventures MCP platform
Menu

vulnerability / NVI-00003147 / Revision 1

Pterodactyl Panel: Client email change endpoint allows enumeration of accounts in system

OSV carries this publisher advisory for pterodactyl/panel. This is an aggregated source copy; consult the original publisher and compare update dates.

source listedactiveGHSA-j7f5-gfqm-pcx3

This report has not inspected your inventory, configuration, deployed build, reachability or evidence. A catalog listing and a severity score do not establish exposure or compromise.

01 / Meaning

Why it matters

Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.

02 / Applicability

The affected context

Affected versions, configuration prerequisites and known exclusions are public. Confirm each one against the deployed service.

pterodactyl/panel

source listed
  • ECOSYSTEM: introduced 0; fixed 1.12.3

### Summary An unprotected user enumeration vulnerability exists in the account email update endpoint, allowing authenticated users to verify whether email addresses are registered on the panel through automated requests without rate limiting or CAPTCHA protection. ### Details The account settings page allows authenticated users to update their email address through a POST request. Unlike the login and password reset forms which implement reCAPTCHA and rate limiting protections, this endpoint lacks these safeguards entirely. An attacker can capture the email update request (for example, using Burp Suite's proxy) and modify the email field to test arbitrary addresses. The panel's response will confirm whether each tested email is already registered in the system. Because there are no rate limits implemented, attackers can send hundreds or thousands of requests to enumerate the user base. This is concerning because: - The login and password reset pages correctly implement protections against enumeration - The account page has no reCAPTCHA option available - No rate limiting exists in the panel for this endpoint - Authentication is required, but any valid account (including free ti

GitHub Advisory Database via OSV

03 / Response

What to do next

  1. vendor patch

    The original advisory lists fixed boundaries 1.12.3 for pterodactyl/panel. Confirm the publisher’s latest guidance.

    Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. GitHub Advisory Database via OSV

A fixed release is not deployment evidence.

Check current vendor support and compatibility. After making a change, verify the deployed build and relevant runtime conditions. Keep the evidence, owner and time. An updated lockfile alone does not prove what is running.

04 / Limits

What this report cannot establish

  • Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.
Read the collection and interpretation limits ↗

05 / Provenance

Sources you can inspect

Each assertion retains its source. Mirrored records may repeat one underlying publisher; additional links are not independent corroboration.

  1. GHSA-j7f5-gfqm-pcx3 ↗

    GitHub Advisory Database via OSV · vendor advisory

    Observed . GitHub-origin advisory, CC-BY-4.0; OSV is an aggregate copy, not independent corroboration.

Public revision history

Only published revisions appear here. Routine fetches do not create a material-change event.

  1. Revision 1 ·

    First indexed by Null; source disclosure date is shown separately.

Read the public revision data ↗

The next step is private

Bring the question into your environment.

The connected workflow is a development preview for inventory, contextual matching, owner decisions and evidence-based verification. No system-specific result is generated by this page.

See the synthetic workflow preview ↗