By Null Ventures MCP platform
Menu

vulnerability / NVI-00003257 / Revision 1

silverstripe/framework missing ACL on reports

OSV carries this publisher advisory for silverstripe/framework, silverstripe/framework, silverstripe/framework, silverstripe/framework. This is an aggregated source copy; consult the original publisher and compare update dates.

source listedactiveGHSA-52cx-hpc5-cxwc

This report has not inspected your inventory, configuration, deployed build, reachability or evidence. A catalog listing and a severity score do not establish exposure or compromise.

01 / Meaning

Why it matters

Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.

02 / Applicability

The affected context

Affected versions, configuration prerequisites and known exclusions are public. Confirm each one against the deployed service.

silverstripe/framework

source listed
  • ECOSYSTEM: introduced 3.1.19-rc1; fixed 3.1.20

The SS_Report, and the reports CMS section only checks `canView()` when listing the reports that can be viewed by the current user. It does not (and should) perform `canView` checks when the report is actually viewed, so if you know the URL to a report and can otherwise access the Reports section of the CMS, you can view any report.

GitHub Advisory Database via OSV

silverstripe/framework

source listed
  • ECOSYSTEM: introduced 3.2.4-rc1; fixed 3.2.5

The SS_Report, and the reports CMS section only checks `canView()` when listing the reports that can be viewed by the current user. It does not (and should) perform `canView` checks when the report is actually viewed, so if you know the URL to a report and can otherwise access the Reports section of the CMS, you can view any report.

GitHub Advisory Database via OSV

silverstripe/framework

source listed
  • ECOSYSTEM: introduced 3.3.2-rc1; fixed 3.3.3

The SS_Report, and the reports CMS section only checks `canView()` when listing the reports that can be viewed by the current user. It does not (and should) perform `canView` checks when the report is actually viewed, so if you know the URL to a report and can otherwise access the Reports section of the CMS, you can view any report.

GitHub Advisory Database via OSV

silverstripe/framework

source listed
  • ECOSYSTEM: introduced 3.4.0-rc1; fixed 3.4.1

The SS_Report, and the reports CMS section only checks `canView()` when listing the reports that can be viewed by the current user. It does not (and should) perform `canView` checks when the report is actually viewed, so if you know the URL to a report and can otherwise access the Reports section of the CMS, you can view any report.

GitHub Advisory Database via OSV

03 / Response

What to do next

  1. vendor patch

    The original advisory lists fixed boundaries 3.1.20 for silverstripe/framework. Confirm the publisher’s latest guidance.

    Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. GitHub Advisory Database via OSV

  2. vendor patch

    The original advisory lists fixed boundaries 3.2.5 for silverstripe/framework. Confirm the publisher’s latest guidance.

    Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. GitHub Advisory Database via OSV

  3. vendor patch

    The original advisory lists fixed boundaries 3.3.3 for silverstripe/framework. Confirm the publisher’s latest guidance.

    Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. GitHub Advisory Database via OSV

  4. vendor patch

    The original advisory lists fixed boundaries 3.4.1 for silverstripe/framework. Confirm the publisher’s latest guidance.

    Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. GitHub Advisory Database via OSV

A fixed release is not deployment evidence.

Check current vendor support and compatibility. After making a change, verify the deployed build and relevant runtime conditions. Keep the evidence, owner and time. An updated lockfile alone does not prove what is running.

04 / Limits

What this report cannot establish

  • Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.
Read the collection and interpretation limits ↗

05 / Provenance

Sources you can inspect

Each assertion retains its source. Mirrored records may repeat one underlying publisher; additional links are not independent corroboration.

  1. GHSA-52cx-hpc5-cxwc ↗

    GitHub Advisory Database via OSV · vendor advisory

    Observed . GitHub-origin advisory, CC-BY-4.0; OSV is an aggregate copy, not independent corroboration.

Public revision history

Only published revisions appear here. Routine fetches do not create a material-change event.

  1. Revision 1 ·

    First indexed by Null; source disclosure date is shown separately.

Read the public revision data ↗

The next step is private

Bring the question into your environment.

The connected workflow is a development preview for inventory, contextual matching, owner decisions and evidence-based verification. No system-specific result is generated by this page.

See the synthetic workflow preview ↗