By Null Ventures MCP platform
Menu

vulnerability / NVI-00003664 / Revision 5

shopper/framework: Authorization bypass in multiple Livewire admin components

GitHub lists this reviewed advisory for shopper/framework. Published version ranges and source prerequisites are shown below; this is not an inspection of a visitor’s application.

source listedactiveGHSA-f946-9qp6-vgchCVE-2026-47740

This report has not inspected your inventory, configuration, deployed build, reachability or evidence. A catalog listing and a severity score do not establish exposure or compromise.

01 / Meaning

Why it matters

Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.

CVSS

8.1 high

GitHub source severity; exploitability and local consequence require separate evidence.

As of · GitHub Advisory Database

EPSS

0.258%

FIRST EPSS model v2026.06.15; exploitation probability over 30 days, percentile 0.17458. Missing scores are unknown.

As of · FIRST EPSS

02 / Applicability

The affected context

Affected versions, configuration prerequisites and known exclusions are public. Confirm each one against the deployed service.

shopper/framework

source listed
  • < 2.8.0

## Impact Multiple Livewire components in the admin panel allowed an authenticated low-privilege user to mutate data without the required permission: - Order detail Filament actions (cancel, mark paid, mark complete, capture payment, archive, start processing) were callable with `read_orders` only and did not require `edit_orders`. `capturePayment` could trigger an actual PSP capture. - Order shipments table actions (mark delivered, edit tracking) were callable with `browse_orders` only. - Sub-form Livewire components for products (Edit, Inventory, Seo, Shipping, Files) had no authorization on `store()`, so any authenticated panel user could mutate product data without `edit_products`. - `Settings/Team/Index` had no `mount()` authorization at all — any authenticated user could create roles and delete other users. - `Settings/Team/RolePermission` gated its write actions on the read-only `view_users` permission, allowing privilege escalation via the RBAC system itself. - `PaymentMethods`, `Currencies`, `Carriers` table toggles and per-record actions had no per-action permission check. - `Customers/Create::store()` re-passed a Hidden `_password` form field into the create payload.

GitHub Advisory Database

shopper/framework

source listed
  • ECOSYSTEM: introduced 0; fixed 2.8.0

## Impact Multiple Livewire components in the admin panel allowed an authenticated low-privilege user to mutate data without the required permission: - Order detail Filament actions (cancel, mark paid, mark complete, capture payment, archive, start processing) were callable with `read_orders` only and did not require `edit_orders`. `capturePayment` could trigger an actual PSP capture. - Order shipments table actions (mark delivered, edit tracking) were callable with `browse_orders` only. - Sub-form Livewire components for products (Edit, Inventory, Seo, Shipping, Files) had no authorization on `store()`, so any authenticated panel user could mutate product data without `edit_products`. - `Settings/Team/Index` had no `mount()` authorization at all — any authenticated user could create roles and delete other users. - `Settings/Team/RolePermission` gated its write actions on the read-only `view_users` permission, allowing privilege escalation via the RBAC system itself. - `PaymentMethods`, `Currencies`, `Carriers` table toggles and per-record actions had no per-action permission check. - `Customers/Create::store()` re-passed a Hidden `_password` form field into the create payload.

GitHub Advisory Database via OSV

03 / Response

What to do next

  1. investigate

    Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.

    Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. FIRST EPSS

  2. vendor patch

    The original advisory lists fixed boundaries 2.8.0 for shopper/framework. Confirm the publisher’s latest guidance.

    Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. GitHub Advisory Database via OSV

A fixed release is not deployment evidence.

Check current vendor support and compatibility. After making a change, verify the deployed build and relevant runtime conditions. Keep the evidence, owner and time. An updated lockfile alone does not prove what is running.

04 / Limits

What this report cannot establish

  • Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.
  • NVD lastModified does not establish freshness of every associated CPE record.
Read the collection and interpretation limits ↗

05 / Provenance

Sources you can inspect

Each assertion retains its source. Mirrored records may repeat one underlying publisher; additional links are not independent corroboration.

  1. GHSA-f946-9qp6-vgch ↗

    GitHub Advisory Database · vendor advisory

    Observed . GitHub Advisory Database; CC-BY-4.0. Each advisory links its original attribution. Null normalizes fields.

  2. GHSA-f946-9qp6-vgch ↗

    GitHub Advisory Database via OSV · vendor advisory

    Observed . GitHub-origin advisory, CC-BY-4.0; OSV is an aggregate copy, not independent corroboration.

  3. CVE-2026-47740 ↗

    NIST National Vulnerability Database · official catalog

    Observed . This product uses data from the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.

  4. CVE-2026-47740 ↗

    FIRST EPSS · official catalog

    Observed . FIRST EPSS; probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, not local compromise. Dataset date/model retained; FIRST services terms apply.

Public revision history

Only published revisions appear here. Routine fetches do not create a material-change event.

  1. Revision 5 ·

    Source facts changed; compare the preserved prior revision.

  2. Revision 4 ·

    Source facts changed; compare the preserved prior revision.

  3. Revision 2 ·

    Dated EPSS estimate updated; this is not a new disclosure or proof of exploitation.

  4. Revision 1 ·

    First indexed by Null; source disclosure date is shown separately.

Read the public revision data ↗

The next step is private

Bring the question into your environment.

The connected workflow is a development preview for inventory, contextual matching, owner decisions and evidence-based verification. No system-specific result is generated by this page.

See the synthetic workflow preview ↗