By Null Ventures MCP platform
Menu

vulnerability / NVI-00004788 / Revision 2

Livewire: Authorization bypass in #[Authorize] via reordered parameter keys and #[Json] execution order

GitHub lists this reviewed advisory for livewire/livewire. Published version ranges and source prerequisites are shown below; this is not an inspection of a visitor’s application.

source listedactiveGHSA-mhf7-xp6r-6qrc

This report has not inspected your inventory, configuration, deployed build, reachability or evidence. A catalog listing and a severity score do not establish exposure or compromise.

01 / Meaning

Why it matters

Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.

CVSS

6.5 medium

GitHub source severity; exploitability and local consequence require separate evidence.

As of · GitHub Advisory Database

02 / Applicability

The affected context

Affected versions, configuration prerequisites and known exclusions are public. Confirm each one against the deployed service.

livewire/livewire

source listed
  • >= 4.3.0, < 4.4.8

### Impact Three issues allowed actions protected by the `#[Authorize]` attribute to run against records the current user is not authorized for: 1. **Out-of-order parameter keys on actions.** `#[Authorize]` resolved a model parameter by its array key, while the action itself received parameters positionally. A request sending params as an object with reordered integer keys (e.g. `{"1": 2, "0": 1}`) could pass authorization with a record the user owns while the action received a different record. With `#[Authorize('delete', 'comment')]` on `deleteComment(Comment $comment)`, a user could delete another user's comment. 2. **The same issue on event listeners.** Methods using both `#[On]` and `#[Authorize]` with a model parameter were affected in the same way through the `__dispatch` call. 3. **`#[Json]` methods ran before authorization.** When a method had both `#[Json]` and `#[Authorize]`, the method body executed before the authorization check. The response was still a 403, but any side effects (such as database writes) had already happened. Only applications using the `#[Authorize]` attribute are affected: on methods that take model parameters (issues 1 and 2), or on `#[Json]` me

GitHub Advisory Database

livewire/livewire

source listed
  • ECOSYSTEM: introduced 4.3.0; fixed 4.4.8

### Impact Three issues allowed actions protected by the `#[Authorize]` attribute to run against records the current user is not authorized for: 1. **Out-of-order parameter keys on actions.** `#[Authorize]` resolved a model parameter by its array key, while the action itself received parameters positionally. A request sending params as an object with reordered integer keys (e.g. `{"1": 2, "0": 1}`) could pass authorization with a record the user owns while the action received a different record. With `#[Authorize('delete', 'comment')]` on `deleteComment(Comment $comment)`, a user could delete another user's comment. 2. **The same issue on event listeners.** Methods using both `#[On]` and `#[Authorize]` with a model parameter were affected in the same way through the `__dispatch` call. 3. **`#[Json]` methods ran before authorization.** When a method had both `#[Json]` and `#[Authorize]`, the method body executed before the authorization check. The response was still a 403, but any side effects (such as database writes) had already happened. Only applications using the `#[Authorize]` attribute are affected: on methods that take model parameters (issues 1 and 2), or on `#[Json]` me

GitHub Advisory Database via OSV

03 / Response

What to do next

  1. investigate

    Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.

    Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. GitHub Advisory Database

  2. vendor patch

    The original advisory lists fixed boundaries 4.4.8 for livewire/livewire. Confirm the publisher’s latest guidance.

    Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. GitHub Advisory Database via OSV

A fixed release is not deployment evidence.

Check current vendor support and compatibility. After making a change, verify the deployed build and relevant runtime conditions. Keep the evidence, owner and time. An updated lockfile alone does not prove what is running.

04 / Limits

What this report cannot establish

  • Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.
Read the collection and interpretation limits ↗

05 / Provenance

Sources you can inspect

Each assertion retains its source. Mirrored records may repeat one underlying publisher; additional links are not independent corroboration.

  1. GHSA-mhf7-xp6r-6qrc ↗

    GitHub Advisory Database · vendor advisory

    Observed . GitHub Advisory Database; CC-BY-4.0. Each advisory links its original attribution. Null normalizes fields.

  2. GHSA-mhf7-xp6r-6qrc ↗

    GitHub Advisory Database via OSV · vendor advisory

    Observed . GitHub-origin advisory, CC-BY-4.0; OSV is an aggregate copy, not independent corroboration.

Public revision history

Only published revisions appear here. Routine fetches do not create a material-change event.

  1. Revision 2 ·

    Source facts changed; compare the preserved prior revision.

  2. Revision 1 ·

    First indexed by Null; source disclosure date is shown separately.

Read the public revision data ↗

The next step is private

Bring the question into your environment.

The connected workflow is a development preview for inventory, contextual matching, owner decisions and evidence-based verification. No system-specific result is generated by this page.

See the synthetic workflow preview ↗