vulnerability / NVI-00005787 / Revision 4
Pimcore has a CustomReports Share Bypass
GitHub lists this reviewed advisory for pimcore/pimcore, pimcore/pimcore, pimcore/pimcore. Published version ranges and source prerequisites are shown below; this is not an inspection of a visitor’s application.
This report has not inspected your inventory, configuration, deployed build, reachability or evidence. A catalog listing and a severity score do not establish exposure or compromise.
01 / Meaning
Why it matters
Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.
7.1 HIGH (4.0)
security-advisories@github.com severity; no combined Null risk score.
0.427%
FIRST EPSS model v2026.06.15; exploitation probability over 30 days, percentile 0.37003. Missing scores are unknown.
As of · FIRST EPSS
02 / Applicability
The affected context
Affected versions, configuration prerequisites and known exclusions are public. Confirm each one against the deployed service.
pimcore/pimcore
source listed>= 12.0.0-RC1, <= 12.3.5
### Summary `CustomReports` uses inconsistent authorization between the report listing endpoint and the report detail endpoint. - The listing flow filters reports based on report-sharing rules - The detail flow only checks generic `reports` or `reports_config` permissions As a result, a low-privileged backend user who was not granted access to a report can still read that report directly by name even though it does not appear in the user's visible report list. In the local Docker reproduction: - The report `poc-secret-report` was not visible to the low-privileged user in the report list - The same user was still able to retrieve the report configuration directly by name ### Root Cause The listing flow in `getReportConfigAction()` filters reports through `loadForGivenUser()`: - [CustomReportController.php](pimcore-12.3.3/bundles/CustomReportsBundle/src/Controller/Reports/[CustomReportController.php](https://github.com/pimcore/pimcore/security/advisories/pimcore-12.3.3/bundles/CustomReportsBundle/src/Controller/Reports/Cus
pimcore/pimcore
source listed<= 11.5.16
### Summary `CustomReports` uses inconsistent authorization between the report listing endpoint and the report detail endpoint. - The listing flow filters reports based on report-sharing rules - The detail flow only checks generic `reports` or `reports_config` permissions As a result, a low-privileged backend user who was not granted access to a report can still read that report directly by name even though it does not appear in the user's visible report list. In the local Docker reproduction: - The report `poc-secret-report` was not visible to the low-privileged user in the report list - The same user was still able to retrieve the report configuration directly by name ### Root Cause The listing flow in `getReportConfigAction()` filters reports through `loadForGivenUser()`: - [CustomReportController.php](pimcore-12.3.3/bundles/CustomReportsBundle/src/Controller/Reports/[CustomReportController.php](https://github.com/pimcore/pimcore/security/advisories/pimcore-12.3.3/bundles/CustomReportsBundle/src/Controller/Reports/Cus
pimcore/pimcore
source listed>= 2026.1.0, < 2026.1.2
### Summary `CustomReports` uses inconsistent authorization between the report listing endpoint and the report detail endpoint. - The listing flow filters reports based on report-sharing rules - The detail flow only checks generic `reports` or `reports_config` permissions As a result, a low-privileged backend user who was not granted access to a report can still read that report directly by name even though it does not appear in the user's visible report list. In the local Docker reproduction: - The report `poc-secret-report` was not visible to the low-privileged user in the report list - The same user was still able to retrieve the report configuration directly by name ### Root Cause The listing flow in `getReportConfigAction()` filters reports through `loadForGivenUser()`: - [CustomReportController.php](pimcore-12.3.3/bundles/CustomReportsBundle/src/Controller/Reports/[CustomReportController.php](https://github.com/pimcore/pimcore/security/advisories/pimcore-12.3.3/bundles/CustomReportsBundle/src/Controller/Reports/Cus
pimcore/pimcore
source listedECOSYSTEM: introduced 12.0.0-RC1; fixed 12.3.6
### Summary `CustomReports` uses inconsistent authorization between the report listing endpoint and the report detail endpoint. - The listing flow filters reports based on report-sharing rules - The detail flow only checks generic `reports` or `reports_config` permissions As a result, a low-privileged backend user who was not granted access to a report can still read that report directly by name even though it does not appear in the user's visible report list. In the local Docker reproduction: - The report `poc-secret-report` was not visible to the low-privileged user in the report list - The same user was still able to retrieve the report configuration directly by name ### Root Cause The listing flow in `getReportConfigAction()` filters reports through `loadForGivenUser()`: - [CustomReportController.php](pimcore-12.3.3/bundles/CustomReportsBundle/src/Controller/Reports/[CustomReportController.php](https://github.com/pimcore/pimcore/security/advisories/pimcore-12.3.3/bundles/CustomReportsBundle/src/Controller/Reports/Cus
pimcore/pimcore
source listedECOSYSTEM: introduced 0; fixed 11.5.17
### Summary `CustomReports` uses inconsistent authorization between the report listing endpoint and the report detail endpoint. - The listing flow filters reports based on report-sharing rules - The detail flow only checks generic `reports` or `reports_config` permissions As a result, a low-privileged backend user who was not granted access to a report can still read that report directly by name even though it does not appear in the user's visible report list. In the local Docker reproduction: - The report `poc-secret-report` was not visible to the low-privileged user in the report list - The same user was still able to retrieve the report configuration directly by name ### Root Cause The listing flow in `getReportConfigAction()` filters reports through `loadForGivenUser()`: - [CustomReportController.php](pimcore-12.3.3/bundles/CustomReportsBundle/src/Controller/Reports/[CustomReportController.php](https://github.com/pimcore/pimcore/security/advisories/pimcore-12.3.3/bundles/CustomReportsBundle/src/Controller/Reports/Cus
pimcore/pimcore
source listedECOSYSTEM: introduced 2026.1.0; fixed 2026.1.2
### Summary `CustomReports` uses inconsistent authorization between the report listing endpoint and the report detail endpoint. - The listing flow filters reports based on report-sharing rules - The detail flow only checks generic `reports` or `reports_config` permissions As a result, a low-privileged backend user who was not granted access to a report can still read that report directly by name even though it does not appear in the user's visible report list. In the local Docker reproduction: - The report `poc-secret-report` was not visible to the low-privileged user in the report list - The same user was still able to retrieve the report configuration directly by name ### Root Cause The listing flow in `getReportConfigAction()` filters reports through `loadForGivenUser()`: - [CustomReportController.php](pimcore-12.3.3/bundles/CustomReportsBundle/src/Controller/Reports/[CustomReportController.php](https://github.com/pimcore/pimcore/security/advisories/pimcore-12.3.3/bundles/CustomReportsBundle/src/Controller/Reports/Cus
03 / Response
What to do next
- investigate
Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.
Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. FIRST EPSS
- vendor patch
The original advisory lists fixed boundaries 12.3.6 for pimcore/pimcore. Confirm the publisher’s latest guidance.
Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. GitHub Advisory Database via OSV
- vendor patch
The original advisory lists fixed boundaries 11.5.17 for pimcore/pimcore. Confirm the publisher’s latest guidance.
Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. GitHub Advisory Database via OSV
- vendor patch
The original advisory lists fixed boundaries 2026.1.2 for pimcore/pimcore. Confirm the publisher’s latest guidance.
Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. GitHub Advisory Database via OSV
A fixed release is not deployment evidence.
Check current vendor support and compatibility. After making a change, verify the deployed build and relevant runtime conditions. Keep the evidence, owner and time. An updated lockfile alone does not prove what is running.
04 / Limits
What this report cannot establish
- Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.
- NVD lastModified does not establish freshness of every associated CPE record.
05 / Provenance
Sources you can inspect
Each assertion retains its source. Mirrored records may repeat one underlying publisher; additional links are not independent corroboration.
- GHSA-jwcc-gv4m-93x6 ↗
GitHub Advisory Database · vendor advisory
Observed . GitHub Advisory Database; CC-BY-4.0. Each advisory links its original attribution. Null normalizes fields.
- GHSA-jwcc-gv4m-93x6 ↗
GitHub Advisory Database via OSV · vendor advisory
Observed . GitHub-origin advisory, CC-BY-4.0; OSV is an aggregate copy, not independent corroboration.
- CVE-2026-45704 ↗
NIST National Vulnerability Database · official catalog
Observed . This product uses data from the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
- CVE-2026-45704 ↗
FIRST EPSS · official catalog
Observed . FIRST EPSS; probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, not local compromise. Dataset date/model retained; FIRST services terms apply.
Public revision history
Only published revisions appear here. Routine fetches do not create a material-change event.
- Revision 4 ·
Source facts changed; compare the preserved prior revision.
- Revision 3 ·
Source facts changed; compare the preserved prior revision.
- Revision 1 ·
First indexed by Null; source disclosure date is shown separately.