By Null Ventures MCP platform
Menu

vulnerability / NVI-00005975 / Revision 4

Lara-zeus Dynamic Dashboard and Artemis do not validate paragraph widget values which can be used for XSS

OSV carries this publisher advisory for lara-zeus/dynamic-dashboard, lara-zeus/artemis. This is an aggregated source copy; consult the original publisher and compare update dates.

source listedactiveGHSA-c6cw-g7fc-4gwcCVE-2024-47817

This report has not inspected your inventory, configuration, deployed build, reachability or evidence. A catalog listing and a severity score do not establish exposure or compromise.

01 / Meaning

Why it matters

Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.

EPSS

0.395%

FIRST EPSS model v2026.06.15; exploitation probability over 30 days, percentile 0.33748. Missing scores are unknown.

As of · FIRST EPSS

02 / Applicability

The affected context

Affected versions, configuration prerequisites and known exclusions are public. Confirm each one against the deployed service.

lara-zeus/dynamic-dashboard

source listed
  • ECOSYSTEM: introduced 3.0.0; fixed 3.0.2

# Summary If values passed to a paragraph widget are not valid and contain a specific set of characters, applications are vulnerable to XSS attack against a user who opens a page on which a paragraph widget is rendered. Versions of dynamic dashboard from v3.0.0 through v3.0.2 are affected. Please upgrade to dynamic dashboard v3.0.2. # PoC >PoC will be published in a few weeks, once developers have had a chance to upgrade their apps. # Response This vulnerability (in paragraph widget only) was reported by **Raghav Sharma**, who reported the issue and patched the issue during the morning of 05/10/2024. Thank you **Raghav Sharma**. The review process concluded the same day at night, which revealed the issue was also present in paragraph widget. This was fixed the same day and dynamic dashboard v3.0.2 followed. ## Note: if you're published the view (blade files), you have to republish them or check the changes on release to update the affected file.

GitHub Advisory Database via OSV

lara-zeus/artemis

source listed
  • ECOSYSTEM: introduced 1.0.0; fixed 1.0.7

# Summary If values passed to a paragraph widget are not valid and contain a specific set of characters, applications are vulnerable to XSS attack against a user who opens a page on which a paragraph widget is rendered. Versions of dynamic dashboard from v3.0.0 through v3.0.2 are affected. Please upgrade to dynamic dashboard v3.0.2. # PoC >PoC will be published in a few weeks, once developers have had a chance to upgrade their apps. # Response This vulnerability (in paragraph widget only) was reported by **Raghav Sharma**, who reported the issue and patched the issue during the morning of 05/10/2024. Thank you **Raghav Sharma**. The review process concluded the same day at night, which revealed the issue was also present in paragraph widget. This was fixed the same day and dynamic dashboard v3.0.2 followed. ## Note: if you're published the view (blade files), you have to republish them or check the changes on release to update the affected file.

GitHub Advisory Database via OSV

03 / Response

What to do next

  1. vendor patch

    The original advisory lists fixed boundaries 3.0.2 for lara-zeus/dynamic-dashboard. Confirm the publisher’s latest guidance.

    Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. GitHub Advisory Database via OSV

  2. vendor patch

    The original advisory lists fixed boundaries 1.0.7 for lara-zeus/artemis. Confirm the publisher’s latest guidance.

    Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. GitHub Advisory Database via OSV

  3. investigate

    Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.

    Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. FIRST EPSS

A fixed release is not deployment evidence.

Check current vendor support and compatibility. After making a change, verify the deployed build and relevant runtime conditions. Keep the evidence, owner and time. An updated lockfile alone does not prove what is running.

04 / Limits

What this report cannot establish

  • Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.
  • NVD lastModified does not establish freshness of every associated CPE record.
Read the collection and interpretation limits ↗

05 / Provenance

Sources you can inspect

Each assertion retains its source. Mirrored records may repeat one underlying publisher; additional links are not independent corroboration.

  1. GHSA-c6cw-g7fc-4gwc ↗

    GitHub Advisory Database via OSV · vendor advisory

    Observed . GitHub-origin advisory, CC-BY-4.0; OSV is an aggregate copy, not independent corroboration.

  2. CVE-2024-47817 ↗

    NIST National Vulnerability Database · official catalog

    Observed . This product uses data from the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.

  3. CVE-2024-47817 ↗

    FIRST EPSS · official catalog

    Observed . FIRST EPSS; probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, not local compromise. Dataset date/model retained; FIRST services terms apply.

Public revision history

Only published revisions appear here. Routine fetches do not create a material-change event.

  1. Revision 4 ·

    Dated EPSS estimate updated; this is not a new disclosure or proof of exploitation.

  2. Revision 3 ·

    Source facts changed; compare the preserved prior revision.

  3. Revision 2 ·

    Dated EPSS estimate updated; this is not a new disclosure or proof of exploitation.

  4. Revision 1 ·

    First indexed by Null; source disclosure date is shown separately.

Read the public revision data ↗

The next step is private

Bring the question into your environment.

The connected workflow is a development preview for inventory, contextual matching, owner decisions and evidence-based verification. No system-specific result is generated by this page.

See the synthetic workflow preview ↗