vulnerability / NVI-00007875 / Revision 2
AVideo: IDOR - Any Admin Can Set Another User's Channel Password via setPassword.json.php
OSV carries this publisher advisory for wwbn/avideo. This is an aggregated source copy; consult the original publisher and compare update dates.
This report has not inspected your inventory, configuration, deployed build, reachability or evidence. A catalog listing and a severity score do not establish exposure or compromise.
01 / Meaning
Why it matters
Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.
0.356%
FIRST EPSS model v2026.06.15; exploitation probability over 30 days, percentile 0.29298. Missing scores are unknown.
As of · FIRST EPSS
02 / Applicability
The affected context
Affected versions, configuration prerequisites and known exclusions are public. Confirm each one against the deployed service.
wwbn/avideo
source listedECOSYSTEM: introduced 0; last_affected 25.0
### Summary The `setPassword.json.php` endpoint in the CustomizeUser plugin allows administrators to set a channel password for any user. Due to a logic error in how the submitted password value is processed, any password containing non-numeric characters is silently coerced to the integer zero before being stored. This means that regardless of the intended password, the stored channel password becomes 0, which any visitor can trivially guess to bypass channel-level access control. ### Details The endpoint correctly restricts access to administrators only, but the password value submitted via the ProfilePassword request parameter is processed with `intval()` before being passed to `User::setProfilePassword()`. The relevant code is: ```php $obj->ProfilePassword = intval(@$_REQUEST['ProfilePassword']); $obj->users_id = $users_id; $obj->response = User::setProfilePassword($users_id, $obj->ProfilePassword); ``` The call to `intval()` on an alphanumeric string such as secretabc123 returns 0. This silently discards the intended password value and stores 0 as the channel password instead. Because the coercion is silent, the administrator receives no error or warning and has no indica
03 / Response
What to do next
- investigate
Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.
Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. FIRST EPSS
A fixed release is not deployment evidence.
Check current vendor support and compatibility. After making a change, verify the deployed build and relevant runtime conditions. Keep the evidence, owner and time. An updated lockfile alone does not prove what is running.
04 / Limits
What this report cannot establish
- Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.
05 / Provenance
Sources you can inspect
Each assertion retains its source. Mirrored records may repeat one underlying publisher; additional links are not independent corroboration.
- GHSA-6547-8hrg-c55m ↗
GitHub Advisory Database via OSV · vendor advisory
Observed . GitHub-origin advisory, CC-BY-4.0; OSV is an aggregate copy, not independent corroboration.
- CVE-2026-33297 ↗
FIRST EPSS · official catalog
Observed . FIRST EPSS; probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, not local compromise. Dataset date/model retained; FIRST services terms apply.
Public revision history
Only published revisions appear here. Routine fetches do not create a material-change event.
- Revision 2 ·
Dated EPSS estimate updated; this is not a new disclosure or proof of exploitation.
- Revision 1 ·
First indexed by Null; source disclosure date is shown separately.