vulnerability / NVI-00009074 / Revision 2
filelock: StrictSoftFileLock and SoftReadWriteLock adopt a protocol directory another user created first, losing mutual exclusion
GitHub lists this reviewed advisory for filelock. Published version ranges and source prerequisites are shown below; this is not an inspection of a visitor’s application.
This report has not inspected your inventory, configuration, deployed build, reachability or evidence. A catalog listing and a severity score do not establish exposure or compromise.
01 / Meaning
Why it matters
Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.
6.3 medium
GitHub source severity; exploitability and local consequence require separate evidence.
As of · GitHub Advisory Database
6.3 MEDIUM (3.1)
security-advisories@github.com severity; no combined Null risk score.
02 / Applicability
The affected context
Affected versions, configuration prerequisites and known exclusions are public. Confirm each one against the deployed service.
filelock
source listed>= 3.30.0, <= 4.2.0
`StrictSoftFileLock`, `AsyncStrictSoftFileLock`, `SoftReadWriteLock` and `AsyncSoftReadWriteLock` keep their whole ownership state as files in a directory derived from the lock path (`.filelock/claims`, `.rw/{gen,holders}`). When that directory already exists they adopt it after checking only that it is a real directory, not who owns it. Another local user who can create names in the lock's directory can create the tree before the first acquire on that path by the user running the lock (below: the lock user). In `/tmp`, `/var/tmp` or another sticky shared directory any user can do that; the sticky bit is a directory flag that lets only a file's owner remove or rename it. The other user then owns the tree. They can unlink the lock user's claims while the lock user holds the lock, so a second process of the lock user, root included, enters the same critical section and neither process sees an error. Against `SoftReadWriteLock` the same position also admits two writers with `on_compromise` silent. It redirects the lock user's own creates and renames into a directory the other user picks (the scanner replaced a repository's `.git/HEAD` with a filelock record written with t
03 / Response
What to do next
- investigate
Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.
Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. NIST National Vulnerability Database
A fixed release is not deployment evidence.
Check current vendor support and compatibility. After making a change, verify the deployed build and relevant runtime conditions. Keep the evidence, owner and time. An updated lockfile alone does not prove what is running.
04 / Limits
What this report cannot establish
- Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.
- NVD lastModified does not establish freshness of every associated CPE record.
05 / Provenance
Sources you can inspect
Each assertion retains its source. Mirrored records may repeat one underlying publisher; additional links are not independent corroboration.
- GHSA-9c4x-gm8v-wgc4 ↗
GitHub Advisory Database · vendor advisory
Observed . GitHub Advisory Database; CC-BY-4.0. Each advisory links its original attribution. Null normalizes fields.
- CVE-2026-112911 ↗
NIST National Vulnerability Database · official catalog
Observed . This product uses data from the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
Public revision history
Only published revisions appear here. Routine fetches do not create a material-change event.
- Revision 2 ·
Source facts changed; compare the preserved prior revision.
- Revision 1 ·
First indexed by Null; source disclosure date is shown separately.