By Null Ventures MCP platform
Menu

vulnerability / NVI-00009172 / Revision 1

Vikunja: Write-level project members can delete admin-tier link shares through an unloaded permission check

GitHub lists this reviewed advisory for code.vikunja.io/api. Published version ranges and source prerequisites are shown below; this is not an inspection of a visitor’s application.

source listedactiveGHSA-fmmf-xq98-g327

This report has not inspected your inventory, configuration, deployed build, reachability or evidence. A catalog listing and a severity score do not establish exposure or compromise.

01 / Meaning

Why it matters

Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.

02 / Applicability

The affected context

Affected versions, configuration prerequisites and known exclusions are public. Confirm each one against the deployed service.

code.vikunja.io/api

source listed
  • >= 0.13.0, <= 2.6.0

## Summary A project member with Write permission can delete an admin-tier link share on that project. The deletion authorization check reads the permission from an object populated only with URL IDs, rather than from the stored share. Its zero value is Read, so the check falls through to project Write permission instead of requiring Admin. ## Details Affected endpoints: - `DELETE /api/v1/projects/{project}/shares/{share}` - `DELETE /api/v2/projects/{project}/shares/{share}` Older v1 releases used `/lists/{list}/shares/{share}` before lists were renamed to projects. In `pkg/routes/api/v2/link_sharing.go:156`, the delete handler passes `&models.LinkSharing{ID: in.ID, ProjectID: in.ProjectID}` to `handler.DoDelete`. The v1 generic handler likewise binds the URL IDs without loading the stored share. `pkg/web/handler/core.go:185` calls `CanDelete` before `Delete`. `LinkSharing.CanDelete` delegates to `canDoLinkShare` in `pkg/models/link_sharing_permissions.go`. That helper loads the project but does not load the link share, then evaluates: ```go if share.Permission == PermissionAdmin { return l.IsAdmin(s, a) } return l.CanWrite(s, a) ``` On deletion, `share.Permission` is

GitHub Advisory Database

03 / Response

What to do next

  1. investigate

    Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.

    Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. GitHub Advisory Database

A fixed release is not deployment evidence.

Check current vendor support and compatibility. After making a change, verify the deployed build and relevant runtime conditions. Keep the evidence, owner and time. An updated lockfile alone does not prove what is running.

04 / Limits

What this report cannot establish

  • Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.
Read the collection and interpretation limits ↗

05 / Provenance

Sources you can inspect

Each assertion retains its source. Mirrored records may repeat one underlying publisher; additional links are not independent corroboration.

  1. GHSA-fmmf-xq98-g327 ↗

    GitHub Advisory Database · vendor advisory

    Observed . GitHub Advisory Database; CC-BY-4.0. Each advisory links its original attribution. Null normalizes fields.

Public revision history

Only published revisions appear here. Routine fetches do not create a material-change event.

  1. Revision 1 ·

    First indexed by Null; source disclosure date is shown separately.

Read the public revision data ↗

The next step is private

Bring the question into your environment.

The connected workflow is a development preview for inventory, contextual matching, owner decisions and evidence-based verification. No system-specific result is generated by this page.

See the synthetic workflow preview ↗