By Null Ventures MCP platform
Menu

supply chain event / NVI-00009663 / Revision 1

Malicious code in hardhat-deep (npm)

GitHub lists this malware advisory for hardhat-deep. Published version ranges and source prerequisites are shown below; this is not an inspection of a visitor’s application.

source listedactiveGHSA-2gp8-v9xv-8rqv

This report has not inspected your inventory, configuration, deployed build, reachability or evidence. A catalog listing and a severity score do not establish exposure or compromise.

01 / Meaning

Why it matters

Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.

02 / Applicability

The affected context

Affected versions, configuration prerequisites and known exclusions are public. Confirm each one against the deployed service.

hardhat-deep

source listed
  • = 2.0.1

## Source: amazon-inspector (fde0a4a0ec197ee1aab9acf20ea157268b553fdb5669c545c27d92cbf89fe304) The npm package hardhat-deep@2.0.1 is a trojanised shell. Its tarball copies the pino logger source tree (README, SECURITY.md, index.d.ts, lib/proto.js, lib/transport.js, lib/worker.js, lib/levels.js, lib/multistream.js, etc.) verbatim, while the package name and manifest description target the Hardhat ecosystem. The only novel file is lib/config.js, a single-line 4,499,968-byte obfuscator.io bundle with a 26,234-entry rotated string array, two decoder functions, hex-encoded strings and control-flow flattening. The package's top-level index.js is modified from pino's original to unconditionally `require('./lib/config')`, so any consumer that `require`s or `import`s hardhat-deep executes this opaque payload inside the installer's Node process. The exported middleware is a no-op cover with no logger functionality, so running the obfuscated blob is the only effect of installing or loading the package. The author identity (Robert King , jsonspack.com) is unrelated to either Hardhat or pinojs. --- Credit: OpenSSF ([source](ht

GitHub Advisory Database

03 / Response

What to do next

  1. investigate

    Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.

    Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. GitHub Advisory Database

A fixed release is not deployment evidence.

Check current vendor support and compatibility. After making a change, verify the deployed build and relevant runtime conditions. Keep the evidence, owner and time. An updated lockfile alone does not prove what is running.

04 / Limits

What this report cannot establish

  • Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.
Read the collection and interpretation limits ↗

05 / Provenance

Sources you can inspect

Each assertion retains its source. Mirrored records may repeat one underlying publisher; additional links are not independent corroboration.

  1. GHSA-2gp8-v9xv-8rqv ↗

    GitHub Advisory Database · vendor advisory

    Observed . GitHub Advisory Database; CC-BY-4.0. Each advisory links its original attribution. Null normalizes fields.

Public revision history

Only published revisions appear here. Routine fetches do not create a material-change event.

  1. Revision 1 ·

    First indexed by Null; source disclosure date is shown separately.

Read the public revision data ↗

The next step is private

Bring the question into your environment.

The connected workflow is a development preview for inventory, contextual matching, owner decisions and evidence-based verification. No system-specific result is generated by this page.

See the synthetic workflow preview ↗