By Null Ventures MCP platform
Menu

supply chain event / NVI-00010079 / Revision 1

Malicious code in @coopeuch/components (npm)

GitHub lists this malware advisory for @coopeuch/components. Published version ranges and source prerequisites are shown below; this is not an inspection of a visitor’s application.

source listedactiveGHSA-p3q5-2wv6-qx57

This report has not inspected your inventory, configuration, deployed build, reachability or evidence. A catalog listing and a severity score do not establish exposure or compromise.

01 / Meaning

Why it matters

Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.

02 / Applicability

The affected context

Affected versions, configuration prerequisites and known exclusions are public. Confirm each one against the deployed service.

@coopeuch/components

source listed
  • = 1.999.999

## Source: amazon-inspector (042f083be94ae23751c73b5a73c0f11e4e9ecafd9ee9f1caa8c05b367ac71de8) The package declares a `postinstall` script (postinstall.js) that runs automatically on `npm install` and collects a broad set of installer-side identifiers: hostname, username, uid/gid, home directory, platform, non-internal network interfaces with MAC addresses and CIDRs, configured DNS servers, internal reverse-DNS name, container runtime indicators, `npm_*` environment variables including the configured registry and scoped registry settings, CI marker variables, and the consuming project's package.json name, version, and declared dependency range for this package. The collected payload is POSTed as JSON to `https://collector.oob.s4yhii.com/_npm-poc/beacon`, and a DNS lookup beacon is issued against a subdomain of `*.oob.s4yhii.com` that encodes the package name as a label. The package is published under the `@coopeuch` scope at an implausibly high version `1.999.999` and specifically introspects the consumer manifest's declared dependency range and the installer's configured registry — a shape consistent with a dependency-confusion squat against an internal scope. Framing the behavior

GitHub Advisory Database

03 / Response

What to do next

  1. investigate

    Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.

    Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. GitHub Advisory Database

A fixed release is not deployment evidence.

Check current vendor support and compatibility. After making a change, verify the deployed build and relevant runtime conditions. Keep the evidence, owner and time. An updated lockfile alone does not prove what is running.

04 / Limits

What this report cannot establish

  • Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.
Read the collection and interpretation limits ↗

05 / Provenance

Sources you can inspect

Each assertion retains its source. Mirrored records may repeat one underlying publisher; additional links are not independent corroboration.

  1. GHSA-p3q5-2wv6-qx57 ↗

    GitHub Advisory Database · vendor advisory

    Observed . GitHub Advisory Database; CC-BY-4.0. Each advisory links its original attribution. Null normalizes fields.

Public revision history

Only published revisions appear here. Routine fetches do not create a material-change event.

  1. Revision 1 ·

    First indexed by Null; source disclosure date is shown separately.

Read the public revision data ↗

The next step is private

Bring the question into your environment.

The connected workflow is a development preview for inventory, contextual matching, owner decisions and evidence-based verification. No system-specific result is generated by this page.

See the synthetic workflow preview ↗