vulnerability / NVI-00010602 / Revision 2
postal-mime: Quadratic CPU consumption when decoding a header of many joinable RFC 2047 base64 encoded words
GitHub lists this reviewed advisory for postal-mime. Published version ranges and source prerequisites are shown below; this is not an inspection of a visitor’s application.
This report has not inspected your inventory, configuration, deployed build, reachability or evidence. A catalog listing and a severity score do not establish exposure or compromise.
01 / Meaning
Why it matters
Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.
7.5 high
GitHub source severity; exploitability and local consequence require separate evidence.
As of · GitHub Advisory Database
02 / Applicability
The affected context
Affected versions, configuration prerequisites and known exclusions are public. Confirm each one against the deployed service.
postal-mime
source listed>= 3.0.0, < 4.0.8
### Impact Decoding a header that holds a long run of joinable RFC 2047 base64 encoded words, such as `=?utf-8?B?QUJD?=` repeated tens of thousands of times in a `Subject`, `From`, `To`, a filename or a description, took time quadratic in the number of words. The join check ran a regex over the text joined so far for every word, which flattens the accumulated string each time. A single well formed message of about 1.6 MB blocked the event loop for one to twenty seconds depending on the host, and inline `message/rfc822` parts multiplied the cost, since each nested message carried its own header budget. Any application that parses untrusted mail with postal-mime 3.0.0 through 4.0.7, including the exported `decodeWords()` helper, is affected. There is no confidentiality or integrity impact. ### Patches Fixed in 4.0.8. The pad check now tracks the last appended word instead of testing the joined text, so decoding is linear in the header length. The same release also counts the parts and header bytes of inline `message/rfc822` sub-messages against the limits of the message as a whole, counts every header line for at least 64 bytes of `maxHeadersSize`, and adds a scaling test that me
postal-mime
source listedSEMVER: introduced 3.0.0; fixed 4.0.8
### Impact Decoding a header that holds a long run of joinable RFC 2047 base64 encoded words, such as `=?utf-8?B?QUJD?=` repeated tens of thousands of times in a `Subject`, `From`, `To`, a filename or a description, took time quadratic in the number of words. The join check ran a regex over the text joined so far for every word, which flattens the accumulated string each time. A single well formed message of about 1.6 MB blocked the event loop for one to twenty seconds depending on the host, and inline `message/rfc822` parts multiplied the cost, since each nested message carried its own header budget. Any application that parses untrusted mail with postal-mime 3.0.0 through 4.0.7, including the exported `decodeWords()` helper, is affected. There is no confidentiality or integrity impact. ### Patches Fixed in 4.0.8. The pad check now tracks the last appended word instead of testing the joined text, so decoding is linear in the header length. The same release also counts the parts and header bytes of inline `message/rfc822` sub-messages against the limits of the message as a whole, counts every header line for at least 64 bytes of `maxHeadersSize`, and adds a scaling test that me
03 / Response
What to do next
- investigate
Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.
Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. GitHub Advisory Database
- vendor patch
The original advisory lists fixed boundaries 4.0.8 for postal-mime. Confirm the publisher’s latest guidance.
Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. GitHub Advisory Database via OSV
A fixed release is not deployment evidence.
Check current vendor support and compatibility. After making a change, verify the deployed build and relevant runtime conditions. Keep the evidence, owner and time. An updated lockfile alone does not prove what is running.
04 / Limits
What this report cannot establish
- Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.
05 / Provenance
Sources you can inspect
Each assertion retains its source. Mirrored records may repeat one underlying publisher; additional links are not independent corroboration.
- GHSA-f2hq-32vh-53cc ↗
GitHub Advisory Database · vendor advisory
Observed . GitHub Advisory Database; CC-BY-4.0. Each advisory links its original attribution. Null normalizes fields.
- GHSA-f2hq-32vh-53cc ↗
GitHub Advisory Database via OSV · vendor advisory
Observed . GitHub-origin advisory, CC-BY-4.0; OSV is an aggregate copy, not independent corroboration.
Public revision history
Only published revisions appear here. Routine fetches do not create a material-change event.
- Revision 2 ·
Source facts changed; compare the preserved prior revision.
- Revision 1 ·
First indexed by Null; source disclosure date is shown separately.