By Null Ventures MCP platform
Menu

vulnerability / NVI-00010671 / Revision 4

Sentry-Javascript: Middleware Bypass when using Tunnel route

GitHub lists this reviewed advisory for @sentry/nextjs, @sentry/nextjs, @sentry/nextjs. Published version ranges and source prerequisites are shown below; this is not an inspection of a visitor’s application.

source listedactiveGHSA-mchm-gjx6-7h55CVE-2026-114139

This report has not inspected your inventory, configuration, deployed build, reachability or evidence. A catalog listing and a severity score do not establish exposure or compromise.

01 / Meaning

Why it matters

Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.

EPSS

0.510%

FIRST EPSS model v2026.06.15; exploitation probability over 30 days, percentile 0.43524. Missing scores are unknown.

As of · FIRST EPSS

02 / Applicability

The affected context

Affected versions, configuration prerequisites and known exclusions are public. Confirm each one against the deployed service.

@sentry/nextjs

source listed
  • >= 9.36.0, < 9.47.2

### Impact The `tunnelRoute` option makes the SDK send browser events to a path on your own Next.js server (for example `/monitoring`), where a rewrite forwards them to Sentry to prevent ad blockers from blocking them. To keep those envelope requests from being rejected by your middleware, the SDK skips middleware for them. The middleware skip was wider than the rewrite. The rewrite only serves requests to the tunnel path itself with the `o` and `p` parameters set. The skip applied to anything under the tunnel path. Requests in that gap go to your application instead of Sentry, and your middleware never runs on them. Skipping middleware does not grant the request any privileges. Routes that check the session server-side are still protected. You are affected only if **all** of the following are true: 1. `tunnelRoute` is set (a string path or `true`), 2. your app is built with **webpack** (Turbopack builds are not affected), 3. some route of your application resolves under the tunnel path. That could be a direct collision (`/monitoring/foo` with `tunnelRoute: '/monitoring'`) or a dynamic segment at the route root (`app/[locale]/…`), which matches any first path segment, and 4. y

GitHub Advisory Database

@sentry/nextjs

source listed
  • >= 10.0.0-alpha.0, < 10.75.2

### Impact The `tunnelRoute` option makes the SDK send browser events to a path on your own Next.js server (for example `/monitoring`), where a rewrite forwards them to Sentry to prevent ad blockers from blocking them. To keep those envelope requests from being rejected by your middleware, the SDK skips middleware for them. The middleware skip was wider than the rewrite. The rewrite only serves requests to the tunnel path itself with the `o` and `p` parameters set. The skip applied to anything under the tunnel path. Requests in that gap go to your application instead of Sentry, and your middleware never runs on them. Skipping middleware does not grant the request any privileges. Routes that check the session server-side are still protected. You are affected only if **all** of the following are true: 1. `tunnelRoute` is set (a string path or `true`), 2. your app is built with **webpack** (Turbopack builds are not affected), 3. some route of your application resolves under the tunnel path. That could be a direct collision (`/monitoring/foo` with `tunnelRoute: '/monitoring'`) or a dynamic segment at the route root (`app/[locale]/…`), which matches any first path segment, and 4. y

GitHub Advisory Database

@sentry/nextjs

source listed
  • >= 11.0.0-alpha.0, < 11.0.0-rc.1

### Impact The `tunnelRoute` option makes the SDK send browser events to a path on your own Next.js server (for example `/monitoring`), where a rewrite forwards them to Sentry to prevent ad blockers from blocking them. To keep those envelope requests from being rejected by your middleware, the SDK skips middleware for them. The middleware skip was wider than the rewrite. The rewrite only serves requests to the tunnel path itself with the `o` and `p` parameters set. The skip applied to anything under the tunnel path. Requests in that gap go to your application instead of Sentry, and your middleware never runs on them. Skipping middleware does not grant the request any privileges. Routes that check the session server-side are still protected. You are affected only if **all** of the following are true: 1. `tunnelRoute` is set (a string path or `true`), 2. your app is built with **webpack** (Turbopack builds are not affected), 3. some route of your application resolves under the tunnel path. That could be a direct collision (`/monitoring/foo` with `tunnelRoute: '/monitoring'`) or a dynamic segment at the route root (`app/[locale]/…`), which matches any first path segment, and 4. y

GitHub Advisory Database

@sentry/nextjs

source listed
  • SEMVER: introduced 9.36.0; fixed 9.47.2

### Impact The `tunnelRoute` option makes the SDK send browser events to a path on your own Next.js server (for example `/monitoring`), where a rewrite forwards them to Sentry to prevent ad blockers from blocking them. To keep those envelope requests from being rejected by your middleware, the SDK skips middleware for them. The middleware skip was wider than the rewrite. The rewrite only serves requests to the tunnel path itself with the `o` and `p` parameters set. The skip applied to anything under the tunnel path. Requests in that gap go to your application instead of Sentry, and your middleware never runs on them. Skipping middleware does not grant the request any privileges. Routes that check the session server-side are still protected. You are affected only if **all** of the following are true: 1. `tunnelRoute` is set (a string path or `true`), 2. your app is built with **webpack** (Turbopack builds are not affected), 3. some route of your application resolves under the tunnel path. That could be a direct collision (`/monitoring/foo` with `tunnelRoute: '/monitoring'`) or a dynamic segment at the route root (`app/[locale]/…`), which matches any first path segment, and 4. y

GitHub Advisory Database via OSV

@sentry/nextjs

source listed
  • SEMVER: introduced 10.0.0-alpha.0; fixed 10.75.2

### Impact The `tunnelRoute` option makes the SDK send browser events to a path on your own Next.js server (for example `/monitoring`), where a rewrite forwards them to Sentry to prevent ad blockers from blocking them. To keep those envelope requests from being rejected by your middleware, the SDK skips middleware for them. The middleware skip was wider than the rewrite. The rewrite only serves requests to the tunnel path itself with the `o` and `p` parameters set. The skip applied to anything under the tunnel path. Requests in that gap go to your application instead of Sentry, and your middleware never runs on them. Skipping middleware does not grant the request any privileges. Routes that check the session server-side are still protected. You are affected only if **all** of the following are true: 1. `tunnelRoute` is set (a string path or `true`), 2. your app is built with **webpack** (Turbopack builds are not affected), 3. some route of your application resolves under the tunnel path. That could be a direct collision (`/monitoring/foo` with `tunnelRoute: '/monitoring'`) or a dynamic segment at the route root (`app/[locale]/…`), which matches any first path segment, and 4. y

GitHub Advisory Database via OSV

@sentry/nextjs

source listed
  • SEMVER: introduced 11.0.0-alpha.0; fixed 11.0.0-rc.1

### Impact The `tunnelRoute` option makes the SDK send browser events to a path on your own Next.js server (for example `/monitoring`), where a rewrite forwards them to Sentry to prevent ad blockers from blocking them. To keep those envelope requests from being rejected by your middleware, the SDK skips middleware for them. The middleware skip was wider than the rewrite. The rewrite only serves requests to the tunnel path itself with the `o` and `p` parameters set. The skip applied to anything under the tunnel path. Requests in that gap go to your application instead of Sentry, and your middleware never runs on them. Skipping middleware does not grant the request any privileges. Routes that check the session server-side are still protected. You are affected only if **all** of the following are true: 1. `tunnelRoute` is set (a string path or `true`), 2. your app is built with **webpack** (Turbopack builds are not affected), 3. some route of your application resolves under the tunnel path. That could be a direct collision (`/monitoring/foo` with `tunnelRoute: '/monitoring'`) or a dynamic segment at the route root (`app/[locale]/…`), which matches any first path segment, and 4. y

GitHub Advisory Database via OSV

03 / Response

What to do next

  1. investigate

    Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.

    Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. FIRST EPSS

  2. vendor patch

    The original advisory lists fixed boundaries 9.47.2 for @sentry/nextjs. Confirm the publisher’s latest guidance.

    Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. GitHub Advisory Database via OSV

  3. vendor patch

    The original advisory lists fixed boundaries 10.75.2 for @sentry/nextjs. Confirm the publisher’s latest guidance.

    Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. GitHub Advisory Database via OSV

  4. vendor patch

    The original advisory lists fixed boundaries 11.0.0-rc.1 for @sentry/nextjs. Confirm the publisher’s latest guidance.

    Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. GitHub Advisory Database via OSV

A fixed release is not deployment evidence.

Check current vendor support and compatibility. After making a change, verify the deployed build and relevant runtime conditions. Keep the evidence, owner and time. An updated lockfile alone does not prove what is running.

04 / Limits

What this report cannot establish

  • Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.
  • NVD lastModified does not establish freshness of every associated CPE record.
Read the collection and interpretation limits ↗

05 / Provenance

Sources you can inspect

Each assertion retains its source. Mirrored records may repeat one underlying publisher; additional links are not independent corroboration.

  1. GHSA-mchm-gjx6-7h55 ↗

    GitHub Advisory Database · vendor advisory

    Observed . GitHub Advisory Database; CC-BY-4.0. Each advisory links its original attribution. Null normalizes fields.

  2. GHSA-mchm-gjx6-7h55 ↗

    GitHub Advisory Database via OSV · vendor advisory

    Observed . GitHub-origin advisory, CC-BY-4.0; OSV is an aggregate copy, not independent corroboration.

  3. CVE-2026-114139 ↗

    NIST National Vulnerability Database · official catalog

    Observed . This product uses data from the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.

  4. CVE-2026-114139 ↗

    FIRST EPSS · official catalog

    Observed . FIRST EPSS; probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, not local compromise. Dataset date/model retained; FIRST services terms apply.

Public revision history

Only published revisions appear here. Routine fetches do not create a material-change event.

  1. Revision 4 ·

    Source facts changed; compare the preserved prior revision.

  2. Revision 3 ·

    Source facts changed; compare the preserved prior revision.

  3. Revision 2 ·

    Dated EPSS estimate updated; this is not a new disclosure or proof of exploitation.

  4. Revision 1 ·

    First indexed by Null; source disclosure date is shown separately.

Read the public revision data ↗

The next step is private

Bring the question into your environment.

The connected workflow is a development preview for inventory, contextual matching, owner decisions and evidence-based verification. No system-specific result is generated by this page.

See the synthetic workflow preview ↗