By Null Ventures MCP platform
Menu

supply chain event / NVI-00011069 / Revision 1

Malicious code in json-bigint-rs (npm)

GitHub lists this malware advisory for json-bigint-rs. Published version ranges and source prerequisites are shown below; this is not an inspection of a visitor’s application.

source listedactiveGHSA-f96g-45hf-3fhj

This report has not inspected your inventory, configuration, deployed build, reachability or evidence. A catalog listing and a severity score do not establish exposure or compromise.

01 / Meaning

Why it matters

Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.

02 / Applicability

The affected context

Affected versions, configuration prerequisites and known exclusions are public. Confirm each one against the deployed service.

json-bigint-rs

source listed
  • = 0.1.1

## Source: amazon-inspector (7f5b71b917a0504deb87a597d9d07527179c2d6bb9ec1f836caa34d6145aa043) On require(), index.js instantiates the shipped json-bigint-rs.wasm module and, for imports declared under the 'wasm:js/string-constants' module namespace, exposes each descriptor's name as an externref global. This mechanism smuggles a full JavaScript payload as WASM import-descriptor names, hiding it from JS-only source scanners. The reconstructed payload is an IIFE wired to node:vm.runInThisContext / runInNewContext that polls three hardcoded hosts (rs.undotest.top, rs.lightnight.top, rs.belivelight.top) every 30 seconds and executes the response body as JavaScript in-process with access to console and process. Execution is gated by NODE_ENV==='production', so the dropper stays dormant on developer machines and activates on servers and CI. The remote hosts are mutable and unrelated to any documented publisher; the behavior is undocumented in README. The package name and stated purpose (a bignum JSON parser) provide cover for a delivery vehicle whose only observable install/require-time effect is fetching and evaluating attacker-chosen JavaScript. --- Credit: [OpenSSF](https://github.

GitHub Advisory Database

03 / Response

What to do next

  1. investigate

    Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.

    Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. GitHub Advisory Database

A fixed release is not deployment evidence.

Check current vendor support and compatibility. After making a change, verify the deployed build and relevant runtime conditions. Keep the evidence, owner and time. An updated lockfile alone does not prove what is running.

04 / Limits

What this report cannot establish

  • Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.
Read the collection and interpretation limits ↗

05 / Provenance

Sources you can inspect

Each assertion retains its source. Mirrored records may repeat one underlying publisher; additional links are not independent corroboration.

  1. GHSA-f96g-45hf-3fhj ↗

    GitHub Advisory Database · vendor advisory

    Observed . GitHub Advisory Database; CC-BY-4.0. Each advisory links its original attribution. Null normalizes fields.

Public revision history

Only published revisions appear here. Routine fetches do not create a material-change event.

  1. Revision 1 ·

    First indexed by Null; source disclosure date is shown separately.

Read the public revision data ↗

The next step is private

Bring the question into your environment.

The connected workflow is a development preview for inventory, contextual matching, owner decisions and evidence-based verification. No system-specific result is generated by this page.

See the synthetic workflow preview ↗