By Null Ventures MCP platform
Menu

vulnerability / NVI-00011766 / Revision 4

ApostropheCMS: Unauthenticated publicApiProjection bypass via search and sort query builders in the public REST API

GitHub lists this reviewed advisory for apostrophe. Published version ranges and source prerequisites are shown below; this is not an inspection of a visitor’s application.

source listedactiveGHSA-rqgm-cfrp-4hx8CVE-2026-112954

This report has not inspected your inventory, configuration, deployed build, reachability or evidence. A catalog listing and a severity score do not establish exposure or compromise.

01 / Meaning

Why it matters

Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.

CVSS

5.3 medium

GitHub source severity; exploitability and local consequence require separate evidence.

As of · GitHub Advisory Database

EPSS

0.444%

FIRST EPSS model v2026.06.15; exploitation probability over 30 days, percentile 0.3867. Missing scores are unknown.

As of · FIRST EPSS

02 / Applicability

The affected context

Affected versions, configuration prerequisites and known exclusions are public. Confirm each one against the deployed service.

apostrophe

source listed
  • < 4.34.0

### Summary ApostropheCMS lets a module expose an anonymous read API by setting `publicApiProjection`, which whitelists the document fields unauthenticated callers may see. The public REST GET handler applies every launderable query builder from the query string *before* forcing that projection. Two of those builders, `search` and `sort`, operate on the underlying documents rather than the projected output, and neither is checked against the projection. An unauthenticated attacker can therefore: - use `?search=` as a **value oracle** to confirm and locate documents by the content of a field the projection was meant to hide, and - use `?sort[hiddenField]=1` as an **ordering oracle** to rank documents by a hidden field's value. This is the same confidentiality-bypass class already patched for the `choices`/`counts` builders (gated by `choicesFieldAllowedByProjection`). That gate was never applied to `search` or `sort`. ### Details For an anonymous caller, `getRestQuery` (piece types: `modules/@apostrophecms/piece-type/index.js:1142`; pages: `modules/@apostrophecms/page/index.js`) does: ```js const query = self.find(req).attachments(true); query.applyBuildersSafely(req.query

GitHub Advisory Database

apostrophe

source listed
  • SEMVER: introduced 0; fixed 4.34.0

### Summary ApostropheCMS lets a module expose an anonymous read API by setting `publicApiProjection`, which whitelists the document fields unauthenticated callers may see. The public REST GET handler applies every launderable query builder from the query string *before* forcing that projection. Two of those builders, `search` and `sort`, operate on the underlying documents rather than the projected output, and neither is checked against the projection. An unauthenticated attacker can therefore: - use `?search=` as a **value oracle** to confirm and locate documents by the content of a field the projection was meant to hide, and - use `?sort[hiddenField]=1` as an **ordering oracle** to rank documents by a hidden field's value. This is the same confidentiality-bypass class already patched for the `choices`/`counts` builders (gated by `choicesFieldAllowedByProjection`). That gate was never applied to `search` or `sort`. ### Details For an anonymous caller, `getRestQuery` (piece types: `modules/@apostrophecms/piece-type/index.js:1142`; pages: `modules/@apostrophecms/page/index.js`) does: ```js const query = self.find(req).attachments(true); query.applyBuildersSafely(req.query

GitHub Advisory Database via OSV

03 / Response

What to do next

  1. investigate

    Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.

    Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. FIRST EPSS

  2. vendor patch

    The original advisory lists fixed boundaries 4.34.0 for apostrophe. Confirm the publisher’s latest guidance.

    Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. GitHub Advisory Database via OSV

A fixed release is not deployment evidence.

Check current vendor support and compatibility. After making a change, verify the deployed build and relevant runtime conditions. Keep the evidence, owner and time. An updated lockfile alone does not prove what is running.

04 / Limits

What this report cannot establish

  • Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.
  • NVD lastModified does not establish freshness of every associated CPE record.
Read the collection and interpretation limits ↗

05 / Provenance

Sources you can inspect

Each assertion retains its source. Mirrored records may repeat one underlying publisher; additional links are not independent corroboration.

  1. GHSA-rqgm-cfrp-4hx8 ↗

    GitHub Advisory Database · vendor advisory

    Observed . GitHub Advisory Database; CC-BY-4.0. Each advisory links its original attribution. Null normalizes fields.

  2. GHSA-rqgm-cfrp-4hx8 ↗

    GitHub Advisory Database via OSV · vendor advisory

    Observed . GitHub-origin advisory, CC-BY-4.0; OSV is an aggregate copy, not independent corroboration.

  3. CVE-2026-112954 ↗

    NIST National Vulnerability Database · official catalog

    Observed . This product uses data from the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.

  4. CVE-2026-112954 ↗

    FIRST EPSS · official catalog

    Observed . FIRST EPSS; probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, not local compromise. Dataset date/model retained; FIRST services terms apply.

Public revision history

Only published revisions appear here. Routine fetches do not create a material-change event.

  1. Revision 4 ·

    Source facts changed; compare the preserved prior revision.

  2. Revision 3 ·

    Source facts changed; compare the preserved prior revision.

  3. Revision 1 ·

    First indexed by Null; source disclosure date is shown separately.

Read the public revision data ↗

The next step is private

Bring the question into your environment.

The connected workflow is a development preview for inventory, contextual matching, owner decisions and evidence-based verification. No system-specific result is generated by this page.

See the synthetic workflow preview ↗