By Null Ventures MCP platform
Menu

vulnerability / NVI-00011857 / Revision 1

@angular/router: Denial of Service via Unmatched Empty-Path Outlet Route Matching in Server-Side Rendering (SSR)

GitHub lists this reviewed advisory for @angular/router, @angular/router, @angular/router, @angular/router. Published version ranges and source prerequisites are shown below; this is not an inspection of a visitor’s application.

source listedactiveGHSA-62vg-58rm-qff7CVE-2026-111752

This report has not inspected your inventory, configuration, deployed build, reachability or evidence. A catalog listing and a severity score do not establish exposure or compromise.

01 / Meaning

Why it matters

Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.

02 / Applicability

The affected context

Affected versions, configuration prerequisites and known exclusions are public. Confirm each one against the deployed service.

@angular/router

source listed
  • >= 22.0.0, < 22.2.1

A denial of service (DoS) vulnerability was identified in `@angular/router` when Server-Side Rendering (SSR) is enabled on Node.js (V8). During route recognition, `@angular/router` fails to validate whether an auxiliary outlet segment in the URL matches a route configured for that specific outlet name. Because unconfigured empty-path outlet groups (such as `a:/()`, `x:/(...)`, or `///(...)`) are not rejected during matching, the router repeatedly re-evaluates the route configuration against each arbitrary outlet segment provided in the URL. When a request URL contains multiple arbitrary empty-path outlet segments, this improper matching forces the router to instantiate duplicate `ActivatedRouteSnapshot` trees, repeatedly execute `canMatch` guards and route resolvers, and allocate separate copies of route parameters and `queryParams` for each unconfigured outlet. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this behavior by sending requests with crafted outlet segments to exhaust the Node.js memory heap or overwhelm CPU resources, leading to SSR worker termination and service disruption. ### Impact Successful exploitation allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to exhaust t

GitHub Advisory Database

@angular/router

source listed
  • >= 21.0.0, < 21.2.25

A denial of service (DoS) vulnerability was identified in `@angular/router` when Server-Side Rendering (SSR) is enabled on Node.js (V8). During route recognition, `@angular/router` fails to validate whether an auxiliary outlet segment in the URL matches a route configured for that specific outlet name. Because unconfigured empty-path outlet groups (such as `a:/()`, `x:/(...)`, or `///(...)`) are not rejected during matching, the router repeatedly re-evaluates the route configuration against each arbitrary outlet segment provided in the URL. When a request URL contains multiple arbitrary empty-path outlet segments, this improper matching forces the router to instantiate duplicate `ActivatedRouteSnapshot` trees, repeatedly execute `canMatch` guards and route resolvers, and allocate separate copies of route parameters and `queryParams` for each unconfigured outlet. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this behavior by sending requests with crafted outlet segments to exhaust the Node.js memory heap or overwhelm CPU resources, leading to SSR worker termination and service disruption. ### Impact Successful exploitation allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to exhaust t

GitHub Advisory Database

@angular/router

source listed
  • >= 20.0.0, < 20.3.33

A denial of service (DoS) vulnerability was identified in `@angular/router` when Server-Side Rendering (SSR) is enabled on Node.js (V8). During route recognition, `@angular/router` fails to validate whether an auxiliary outlet segment in the URL matches a route configured for that specific outlet name. Because unconfigured empty-path outlet groups (such as `a:/()`, `x:/(...)`, or `///(...)`) are not rejected during matching, the router repeatedly re-evaluates the route configuration against each arbitrary outlet segment provided in the URL. When a request URL contains multiple arbitrary empty-path outlet segments, this improper matching forces the router to instantiate duplicate `ActivatedRouteSnapshot` trees, repeatedly execute `canMatch` guards and route resolvers, and allocate separate copies of route parameters and `queryParams` for each unconfigured outlet. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this behavior by sending requests with crafted outlet segments to exhaust the Node.js memory heap or overwhelm CPU resources, leading to SSR worker termination and service disruption. ### Impact Successful exploitation allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to exhaust t

GitHub Advisory Database

@angular/router

source listed
  • <= 19.2.25

A denial of service (DoS) vulnerability was identified in `@angular/router` when Server-Side Rendering (SSR) is enabled on Node.js (V8). During route recognition, `@angular/router` fails to validate whether an auxiliary outlet segment in the URL matches a route configured for that specific outlet name. Because unconfigured empty-path outlet groups (such as `a:/()`, `x:/(...)`, or `///(...)`) are not rejected during matching, the router repeatedly re-evaluates the route configuration against each arbitrary outlet segment provided in the URL. When a request URL contains multiple arbitrary empty-path outlet segments, this improper matching forces the router to instantiate duplicate `ActivatedRouteSnapshot` trees, repeatedly execute `canMatch` guards and route resolvers, and allocate separate copies of route parameters and `queryParams` for each unconfigured outlet. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this behavior by sending requests with crafted outlet segments to exhaust the Node.js memory heap or overwhelm CPU resources, leading to SSR worker termination and service disruption. ### Impact Successful exploitation allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to exhaust t

GitHub Advisory Database

03 / Response

What to do next

  1. investigate

    Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.

    Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. GitHub Advisory Database

A fixed release is not deployment evidence.

Check current vendor support and compatibility. After making a change, verify the deployed build and relevant runtime conditions. Keep the evidence, owner and time. An updated lockfile alone does not prove what is running.

04 / Limits

What this report cannot establish

  • Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.
Read the collection and interpretation limits ↗

05 / Provenance

Sources you can inspect

Each assertion retains its source. Mirrored records may repeat one underlying publisher; additional links are not independent corroboration.

  1. GHSA-62vg-58rm-qff7 ↗

    GitHub Advisory Database · vendor advisory

    Observed . GitHub Advisory Database; CC-BY-4.0. Each advisory links its original attribution. Null normalizes fields.

Public revision history

Only published revisions appear here. Routine fetches do not create a material-change event.

  1. Revision 1 ·

    First indexed by Null; source disclosure date is shown separately.

Read the public revision data ↗

The next step is private

Bring the question into your environment.

The connected workflow is a development preview for inventory, contextual matching, owner decisions and evidence-based verification. No system-specific result is generated by this page.

See the synthetic workflow preview ↗