vulnerability / NVI-00011905 / Revision 2
Multidict: Reference leak in CIMultiDict/MultiDict items-view union and subtraction
GitHub lists this reviewed advisory for multidict. Published version ranges and source prerequisites are shown below; this is not an inspection of a visitor’s application.
This report has not inspected your inventory, configuration, deployed build, reachability or evidence. A catalog listing and a severity score do not establish exposure or compromise.
01 / Meaning
Why it matters
Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.
5.3 medium
GitHub source severity; exploitability and local consequence require separate evidence.
As of · GitHub Advisory Database
0.448%
FIRST EPSS model v2026.06.15; exploitation probability over 30 days, percentile 0.38972. Missing scores are unknown.
As of · FIRST EPSS
02 / Applicability
The affected context
Affected versions, configuration prerequisites and known exclusions are public. Confirm each one against the deployed service.
multidict
source listed>= 6.7.0, <= 6.9.0
## Description A reference leak in the items-view union and subtraction operators of aio-libs/multidict 6.7.0 through 6.9.0 (C extension) lets a remote client drive unbounded, unreclaimable memory growth by having each operand element leak one key-identity object and one value object. The reflected-union path (`operand | d.items()`, `multidict_itemsview_or2_impl`) and the subtraction path (`d.items() - operand`, `multidict_itemsview_sub1_impl`) parse each element into new strong references but release only the tuple wrapper, never the identity and value. Servers in the aio-libs stack build these views over attacker-supplied HTTP headers and query strings, so the operand size is under remote control. Forced garbage collection does not recover the leaked objects, so resident memory rises monotonically until the process is killed. --- ## Root Cause `_multidict_itemsview_parse_item()` returns **new** references: a fresh identity via `md_calc_identity()` and a fresh value via `Py_NewRef()`. The `or2_impl` first parse loop requests both but clears only `arg`: ```c // views.h:565 — or2_impl first parse loop while ((st = PyIter_NextItem(iter, &arg)) > 0) { int tmp = _multidict_ite
03 / Response
What to do next
- investigate
Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.
Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. FIRST EPSS
A fixed release is not deployment evidence.
Check current vendor support and compatibility. After making a change, verify the deployed build and relevant runtime conditions. Keep the evidence, owner and time. An updated lockfile alone does not prove what is running.
04 / Limits
What this report cannot establish
- Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.
05 / Provenance
Sources you can inspect
Each assertion retains its source. Mirrored records may repeat one underlying publisher; additional links are not independent corroboration.
- GHSA-54p9-h82j-f925 ↗
GitHub Advisory Database · vendor advisory
Observed . GitHub Advisory Database; CC-BY-4.0. Each advisory links its original attribution. Null normalizes fields.
- CVE-2026-104874 ↗
FIRST EPSS · official catalog
Observed . FIRST EPSS; probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, not local compromise. Dataset date/model retained; FIRST services terms apply.
Public revision history
Only published revisions appear here. Routine fetches do not create a material-change event.
- Revision 2 ·
Dated EPSS estimate updated; this is not a new disclosure or proof of exploitation.
- Revision 1 ·
First indexed by Null; source disclosure date is shown separately.