vulnerability / NVI-00012081 / Revision 1
DOMPurify: IN_PLACE returns a force-removed rawtext root whose text carries attacker markup — pure HTML reparse executes
GitHub lists this reviewed advisory for dompurify. Published version ranges and source prerequisites are shown below; this is not an inspection of a visitor’s application.
This report has not inspected your inventory, configuration, deployed build, reachability or evidence. A catalog listing and a severity score do not establish exposure or compromise.
01 / Meaning
Why it matters
Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.
02 / Applicability
The affected context
Affected versions, configuration prerequisites and known exclusions are public. Confirm each one against the deployed service.
dompurify
source listed<= 3.4.15
## Environment - dompurify 3.4.15 (current npm release); reproduced independently on jsdom 30.0.1 and 29.1.1 (Node.js 20.x / 26.x) - Config: `DOMPurify.sanitize(node, { IN_PLACE: true })` on a Node input; `SAFE_FOR_XML` at its default (`true`) ## Summary The 3.4.9 fix for the IN_PLACE detached-root class added two protections on the IN_PLACE return path: a fail-closed `TypeError` in `_forceRemove` when a node selected for removal cannot be detached, and a `_neutralizeSubtree` pass (`dist/purify.js` line 1336) that strips non-allowlisted **attributes** from removed subtrees. Both miss the rawtext **text-content** form. When the force-removed root is a rawtext element (``), the payload lives in the node's *text*: the node detaches fine (the `TypeError` guard is not reached), `_neutralizeSubtree` strips nothing (there are no attributes), and the IN_PLACE exit returns the detached, never-sanitized `` whose text still carries live markup. Serializing that node and re-parsing it in **plain HTML context** materializes the payload — no foreign-content context required. The same Node input sanitized **without** `IN_PLACE` returns an empty result: the only difference is th
03 / Response
What to do next
- investigate
Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.
Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. GitHub Advisory Database
A fixed release is not deployment evidence.
Check current vendor support and compatibility. After making a change, verify the deployed build and relevant runtime conditions. Keep the evidence, owner and time. An updated lockfile alone does not prove what is running.
04 / Limits
What this report cannot establish
- Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.
05 / Provenance
Sources you can inspect
Each assertion retains its source. Mirrored records may repeat one underlying publisher; additional links are not independent corroboration.
- GHSA-6688-9rhm-gjv2 ↗
GitHub Advisory Database · vendor advisory
Observed . GitHub Advisory Database; CC-BY-4.0. Each advisory links its original attribution. Null normalizes fields.
Public revision history
Only published revisions appear here. Routine fetches do not create a material-change event.
- Revision 1 ·
First indexed by Null; source disclosure date is shown separately.