By Null Ventures MCP platform
Menu

vulnerability / NVI-00012980 / Revision 2

Axios: Prototype Pollution Gadget in axios toFormData Options

GitHub lists this reviewed advisory for axios, axios. Published version ranges and source prerequisites are shown below; this is not an inspection of a visitor’s application.

source listedactiveGHSA-x97p-jq2g-jp4fCVE-2026-101909

This report has not inspected your inventory, configuration, deployed build, reachability or evidence. A catalog listing and a severity score do not establish exposure or compromise.

01 / Meaning

Why it matters

Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.

EPSS

0.497%

FIRST EPSS model v2026.06.15; exploitation probability over 30 days, percentile 0.42691. Missing scores are unknown.

As of · FIRST EPSS

02 / Applicability

The affected context

Affected versions, configuration prerequisites and known exclusions are public. Confirm each one against the deployed service.

axios

source listed
  • >= 0.28.0, < 0.34.0

## Summary Axios form serialization reads `visitor`, `maxDepth`, `dots`, `indexes`, `metaTokens`, and `Blob` from an internal options object without own-property guards. When `Object.prototype` has been polluted elsewhere in the same process, those inherited values can change how axios serializes multipart and URL-encoded request bodies. Axios does not create the prototype pollution source. This is a read-side gadget: axios turns an existing same-process pollution condition into altered request serialization or request failures. ## Impact The impact depends on which property is polluted and which axios serialization path the application uses. Polluted `dots`, `indexes`, or `metaTokens` can change field names and cause the receiving service to parse different data than the caller intended. Polluted `maxDepth` can cause nested form submissions to throw `ERR_FORM_DATA_DEPTH_EXCEEDED`, producing request-level or service-level denial of service for affected workflows. Polluted `visitor` can execute as the serializer visitor if an attacker can place a function on `Object.prototype`, but that condition generally implies a stronger same-process code-execution or malicious-dependency p

GitHub Advisory Database

axios

source listed
  • >= 1.15.1, < 1.20.0

## Summary Axios form serialization reads `visitor`, `maxDepth`, `dots`, `indexes`, `metaTokens`, and `Blob` from an internal options object without own-property guards. When `Object.prototype` has been polluted elsewhere in the same process, those inherited values can change how axios serializes multipart and URL-encoded request bodies. Axios does not create the prototype pollution source. This is a read-side gadget: axios turns an existing same-process pollution condition into altered request serialization or request failures. ## Impact The impact depends on which property is polluted and which axios serialization path the application uses. Polluted `dots`, `indexes`, or `metaTokens` can change field names and cause the receiving service to parse different data than the caller intended. Polluted `maxDepth` can cause nested form submissions to throw `ERR_FORM_DATA_DEPTH_EXCEEDED`, producing request-level or service-level denial of service for affected workflows. Polluted `visitor` can execute as the serializer visitor if an attacker can place a function on `Object.prototype`, but that condition generally implies a stronger same-process code-execution or malicious-dependency p

GitHub Advisory Database

03 / Response

What to do next

  1. investigate

    Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.

    Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. FIRST EPSS

A fixed release is not deployment evidence.

Check current vendor support and compatibility. After making a change, verify the deployed build and relevant runtime conditions. Keep the evidence, owner and time. An updated lockfile alone does not prove what is running.

04 / Limits

What this report cannot establish

  • Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.
Read the collection and interpretation limits ↗

05 / Provenance

Sources you can inspect

Each assertion retains its source. Mirrored records may repeat one underlying publisher; additional links are not independent corroboration.

  1. GHSA-x97p-jq2g-jp4f ↗

    GitHub Advisory Database · vendor advisory

    Observed . GitHub Advisory Database; CC-BY-4.0. Each advisory links its original attribution. Null normalizes fields.

  2. CVE-2026-101909 ↗

    FIRST EPSS · official catalog

    Observed . FIRST EPSS; probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, not local compromise. Dataset date/model retained; FIRST services terms apply.

Public revision history

Only published revisions appear here. Routine fetches do not create a material-change event.

  1. Revision 2 ·

    Dated EPSS estimate updated; this is not a new disclosure or proof of exploitation.

  2. Revision 1 ·

    First indexed by Null; source disclosure date is shown separately.

Read the public revision data ↗

The next step is private

Bring the question into your environment.

The connected workflow is a development preview for inventory, contextual matching, owner decisions and evidence-based verification. No system-specific result is generated by this page.

See the synthetic workflow preview ↗