vulnerability / NVI-00013107 / Revision 1
PyJWT: Uncaught RecursionError in jwt.decode() on deeply nested token header
GitHub lists this reviewed advisory for pyJWT. Published version ranges and source prerequisites are shown below; this is not an inspection of a visitor’s application.
This report has not inspected your inventory, configuration, deployed build, reachability or evidence. A catalog listing and a severity score do not establish exposure or compromise.
01 / Meaning
Why it matters
Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.
5.3 medium
GitHub source severity; exploitability and local consequence require separate evidence.
As of · GitHub Advisory Database
02 / Applicability
The affected context
Affected versions, configuration prerequisites and known exclusions are public. Confirm each one against the deployed service.
pyJWT
source listed>= 2.13.0, < 2.14.0
## Package pyjwt (PyPI) ## Affected versions tested & verified on: 2.13.0. Every version whose `PyJWS._load()` translates only `ValueError` is affected ## Description `PyJWS._looad()` (`jwt/api_jws.py:337`) splits the compact token, base64url decodes the header segment and hands it to `json.loads()` before `_verify_signature()` runs. The parse is wrapped in `except ValueError as e: raise DecodeError(...)`. That is what makes the documented contract sufficient for untrusted input: `except jwt.PyJWTError` (or `InvalidTokenError`) around `jwt.decode(token, key, algorithms=[...])`. CPython's JSON decoder raises `RecursionError` (a `RuntimeError` subclass, not a `ValueError`) once nesting crosses the native stack guard. That exception leaves `_load()`, then `jwt.decode()`, and matches no `PyJWTError` handlerr at all. No key and no valid signature are needed: the header is parsed first, so a single unauthenticated request with an unsigned token suffices. Scope: the recursion threshold is ~65,000 nesting levels; below it the same input yields a clean `DecodeError` (a 346,800-byte flat header is rejected normally, so depth, not size, is the trigger). A token this large cannot ride i
03 / Response
What to do next
- investigate
Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.
Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. GitHub Advisory Database
A fixed release is not deployment evidence.
Check current vendor support and compatibility. After making a change, verify the deployed build and relevant runtime conditions. Keep the evidence, owner and time. An updated lockfile alone does not prove what is running.
04 / Limits
What this report cannot establish
- Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.
05 / Provenance
Sources you can inspect
Each assertion retains its source. Mirrored records may repeat one underlying publisher; additional links are not independent corroboration.
- GHSA-8wjv-2p76-3863 ↗
GitHub Advisory Database · vendor advisory
Observed . GitHub Advisory Database; CC-BY-4.0. Each advisory links its original attribution. Null normalizes fields.
Public revision history
Only published revisions appear here. Routine fetches do not create a material-change event.
- Revision 1 ·
First indexed by Null; source disclosure date is shown separately.