vulnerability / NVI-00013215 / Revision 2
Tinypool: Prototype Pollution Gadget to RCE in run() options
GitHub lists this reviewed advisory for tinypool. Published version ranges and source prerequisites are shown below; this is not an inspection of a visitor’s application.
This report has not inspected your inventory, configuration, deployed build, reachability or evidence. A catalog listing and a severity score do not establish exposure or compromise.
01 / Meaning
Why it matters
Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.
9.5 CRITICAL (4.0)
security-advisories@github.com severity; no combined Null risk score.
02 / Applicability
The affected context
Affected versions, configuration prerequisites and known exclusions are public. Confirm each one against the deployed service.
tinypool
source listed< 2.1.2
`tinypool` is a fork of `piscina` and inherited the same prototype-pollution surface. When `pool.run(task, options)` is called, the `filename` option is read from the provided `options` object. If that object does not have an own `filename` property, the lookup falls through to `Object.prototype`. An attacker who can pollute `Object.prototype.filename` (for example, via a vulnerable `lodash.merge`, `qs.parse`, or similar elsewhere in the application) can make tinypool load and execute an attacker-controlled worker module. This is the tinypool counterpart to the piscina root discovery GHSA-x9g3-xrwr-cwfg. `pool.run(task)` with no second argument is not affected, because `kDefaultOptions.filename` is `null` and the options object is not user-controlled. The exploit only triggers when the caller passes their own options object to `pool.run()`. ## Impact Arbitrary JavaScript execution in the worker pool. If the application passes attacker-controlled data as the `run()` task and also supplies a `run()` options object, the attacker can redirect execution to a malicious worker that exfiltrates or modifies
03 / Response
What to do next
- investigate
Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.
Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. NIST National Vulnerability Database
A fixed release is not deployment evidence.
Check current vendor support and compatibility. After making a change, verify the deployed build and relevant runtime conditions. Keep the evidence, owner and time. An updated lockfile alone does not prove what is running.
04 / Limits
What this report cannot establish
- Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.
- NVD lastModified does not establish freshness of every associated CPE record.
05 / Provenance
Sources you can inspect
Each assertion retains its source. Mirrored records may repeat one underlying publisher; additional links are not independent corroboration.
- GHSA-85c8-ppgw-ccpr ↗
GitHub Advisory Database · vendor advisory
Observed . GitHub Advisory Database; CC-BY-4.0. Each advisory links its original attribution. Null normalizes fields.
- CVE-2026-104849 ↗
NIST National Vulnerability Database · official catalog
Observed . This product uses data from the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
Public revision history
Only published revisions appear here. Routine fetches do not create a material-change event.
- Revision 2 ·
Source facts changed; compare the preserved prior revision.
- Revision 1 ·
First indexed by Null; source disclosure date is shown separately.