vulnerability / NVI-00013234 / Revision 1
adm-zip: Decompression-bomb protection (fix for CVE-2026-39244) can be bypassed by declaring uncompressed size as 0
GitHub lists this reviewed advisory for adm-zip. Published version ranges and source prerequisites are shown below; this is not an inspection of a visitor’s application.
This report has not inspected your inventory, configuration, deployed build, reachability or evidence. A catalog listing and a severity score do not establish exposure or compromise.
01 / Meaning
Why it matters
Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.
7.5 high
GitHub source severity; exploitability and local consequence require separate evidence.
As of · GitHub Advisory Database
02 / Applicability
The affected context
Affected versions, configuration prerequisites and known exclusions are public. Confirm each one against the deployed service.
adm-zip
source listed<= 0.6.0
**Affected package:** adm-zip (npm) **Affected version:** 0.6.0 ## Summary The fix shipped for CVE-2026-39244 (`methods/inflater.js`) caps zlib's decompression output via `maxOutputLength: expectedLength`, where `expectedLength` is read directly from the ZIP entry's attacker-controlled "uncompressed size" header field (`CENLEN`/`LOCLEN`). This cap is only applied when `expectedLength > 0`: ```js const option = version >= 15 && expectedLength > 0 ? { maxOutputLength: expectedLength } : {}; return zlib.inflateRawSync(inbuf, option); ``` If an attacker sets the declared uncompressed-size field to exactly **0**, this condition is false, `option` becomes `{}`, and no output cap is passed to zlib at all. Node then falls back to zlib's own internal default limit (several GB), so a small, highly-compressible payload can still be decompressed to a very large size in memory -- the same class of resource-exhaustion issue the original CVE addressed, just triggered differently. ## Steps to Reproduce 1. Build a ZIP archive containing one DEFLATE-compressed entry whose real content is highly redundant (e.g. several MB of a repeated byte, achieving close to the ~1032:1 theoretical raw-DEFLAT
03 / Response
What to do next
- investigate
Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.
Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. GitHub Advisory Database
A fixed release is not deployment evidence.
Check current vendor support and compatibility. After making a change, verify the deployed build and relevant runtime conditions. Keep the evidence, owner and time. An updated lockfile alone does not prove what is running.
04 / Limits
What this report cannot establish
- Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.
05 / Provenance
Sources you can inspect
Each assertion retains its source. Mirrored records may repeat one underlying publisher; additional links are not independent corroboration.
- GHSA-rcw4-f5rp-g42v ↗
GitHub Advisory Database · vendor advisory
Observed . GitHub Advisory Database; CC-BY-4.0. Each advisory links its original attribution. Null normalizes fields.
Public revision history
Only published revisions appear here. Routine fetches do not create a material-change event.
- Revision 1 ·
First indexed by Null; source disclosure date is shown separately.