vulnerability / NVI-00013774 / Revision 1
TAK-PS-Stats Web UI: Authenticated full-read SSRF in CloudTAK basemap import (PUT /api/basemap) — no IP-classification guard
GitHub lists this reviewed advisory for @tak-ps/cloudtak. Published version ranges and source prerequisites are shown below; this is not an inspection of a visitor’s application.
This report has not inspected your inventory, configuration, deployed build, reachability or evidence. A catalog listing and a severity score do not establish exposure or compromise.
01 / Meaning
Why it matters
Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.
5 medium
GitHub source severity; exploitability and local consequence require separate evidence.
As of · GitHub Advisory Database
02 / Applicability
The affected context
Affected versions, configuration prerequisites and known exclusions are public. Confirm each one against the deployed service.
@tak-ps/cloudtak
source listed< 13.22.1
### Summary `PUT /api/basemap` (the basemap import endpoint) fetches an attacker-supplied URL server-side with **no SSRF protection whatsoever**. Any authenticated user can submit a JSON body `{ "type": "...", "url": "" }`; the server calls `fetch(url)` against that URL and then reflects the response body (`name`, `attribution`, `tiles[0]`, zoom levels) back to the caller in the `OptionalTileJSON` response. Because there is no IP-address classification, internal-only services are reachable: cloud metadata (`http://169.254.169.254/...`), loopback (`http://127.0.0.1/...`), RFC1918 ranges, and CGNAT. The response body flows back to the attacker, making this a **full-read SSRF** (not blind): the attacker reads the internal HTTP response verbatim. This enables theft of cloud instance credentials, internal service enumeration, and reading of internal-only HTTP endpoints from the network position of the CloudTAK API server. The only URL check in the basemap protocol layer (`BasemapProtocol.isValidURL`, `api/lib/interface-basemap.ts`) validates the scheme is `http`/`https` only and performs **no host/IP filtering** — and the import path does not even call it; it goes strai
03 / Response
What to do next
- investigate
Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.
Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. GitHub Advisory Database
A fixed release is not deployment evidence.
Check current vendor support and compatibility. After making a change, verify the deployed build and relevant runtime conditions. Keep the evidence, owner and time. An updated lockfile alone does not prove what is running.
04 / Limits
What this report cannot establish
- Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.
05 / Provenance
Sources you can inspect
Each assertion retains its source. Mirrored records may repeat one underlying publisher; additional links are not independent corroboration.
- GHSA-vqrw-qphh-p34v ↗
GitHub Advisory Database · vendor advisory
Observed . GitHub Advisory Database; CC-BY-4.0. Each advisory links its original attribution. Null normalizes fields.
Public revision history
Only published revisions appear here. Routine fetches do not create a material-change event.
- Revision 1 ·
First indexed by Null; source disclosure date is shown separately.