By Null Ventures MCP platform
Menu

vulnerability / NVI-00013776 / Revision 1

MariaDB Connector/J does not enforce allowLocalInfile=false on server-initiated LOCAL INFILE requests

GitHub lists this reviewed advisory for org.mariadb.jdbc:mariadb-java-client, org.mariadb.jdbc:mariadb-java-client, org.mariadb.jdbc:mariadb-java-client, org.mariadb.jdbc:mariadb-java-client. Published version ranges and source prerequisites are shown below; this is not an inspection of a visitor’s application.

source listedactiveGHSA-wxmm-q36w-r9xjCVE-2026-61700

This report has not inspected your inventory, configuration, deployed build, reachability or evidence. A catalog listing and a severity score do not establish exposure or compromise.

01 / Meaning

Why it matters

Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.

CVSS

3.7 low

GitHub source severity; exploitability and local consequence require separate evidence.

As of · GitHub Advisory Database

02 / Applicability

The affected context

Affected versions, configuration prerequisites and known exclusions are public. Confirm each one against the deployed service.

org.mariadb.jdbc:mariadb-java-client

source listed
  • < 2.7.14

## Summary MariaDB Connector/J does not enforce `allowLocalInfile=false` when processing server-initiated LOCAL INFILE requests (protocol packet type `0xfb`). However, exploitation is constrained: the server can only request the exact filename the client already included in its `LOAD DATA LOCAL INFILE` query, it cannot redirect to arbitrary paths. ## Details When a client executes `LOAD DATA LOCAL INFILE '/path/to/file'`, the connector sends the filename to the server as part of the COM_QUERY. A rogue or MitM server responds with a `0xfb` packet echoing that same filename. The connector, without checking `allowLocalInfile`, transmits the file content. The bypass is therefore limited to the file the application itself intended to load. The attacker cannot escalate to other files (e.g. `/etc/passwd`) unless the application's own query targets them. The real-world risk is: - An application that uses `LOAD DATA LOCAL INFILE` on potentially sensitive files (credentials, exports, configs) and connects over an untrusted network. - `allowLocalInfile=false` is supposed to disable this entire mechanism as a defense-in-depth measure, but the flag is ignored. ## Impact

GitHub Advisory Database

org.mariadb.jdbc:mariadb-java-client

source listed
  • >= 3.0.0, < 3.3.5

## Summary MariaDB Connector/J does not enforce `allowLocalInfile=false` when processing server-initiated LOCAL INFILE requests (protocol packet type `0xfb`). However, exploitation is constrained: the server can only request the exact filename the client already included in its `LOAD DATA LOCAL INFILE` query, it cannot redirect to arbitrary paths. ## Details When a client executes `LOAD DATA LOCAL INFILE '/path/to/file'`, the connector sends the filename to the server as part of the COM_QUERY. A rogue or MitM server responds with a `0xfb` packet echoing that same filename. The connector, without checking `allowLocalInfile`, transmits the file content. The bypass is therefore limited to the file the application itself intended to load. The attacker cannot escalate to other files (e.g. `/etc/passwd`) unless the application's own query targets them. The real-world risk is: - An application that uses `LOAD DATA LOCAL INFILE` on potentially sensitive files (credentials, exports, configs) and connects over an untrusted network. - `allowLocalInfile=false` is supposed to disable this entire mechanism as a defense-in-depth measure, but the flag is ignored. ## Impact

GitHub Advisory Database

org.mariadb.jdbc:mariadb-java-client

source listed
  • >= 3.4.0, < 3.4.3

## Summary MariaDB Connector/J does not enforce `allowLocalInfile=false` when processing server-initiated LOCAL INFILE requests (protocol packet type `0xfb`). However, exploitation is constrained: the server can only request the exact filename the client already included in its `LOAD DATA LOCAL INFILE` query, it cannot redirect to arbitrary paths. ## Details When a client executes `LOAD DATA LOCAL INFILE '/path/to/file'`, the connector sends the filename to the server as part of the COM_QUERY. A rogue or MitM server responds with a `0xfb` packet echoing that same filename. The connector, without checking `allowLocalInfile`, transmits the file content. The bypass is therefore limited to the file the application itself intended to load. The attacker cannot escalate to other files (e.g. `/etc/passwd`) unless the application's own query targets them. The real-world risk is: - An application that uses `LOAD DATA LOCAL INFILE` on potentially sensitive files (credentials, exports, configs) and connects over an untrusted network. - `allowLocalInfile=false` is supposed to disable this entire mechanism as a defense-in-depth measure, but the flag is ignored. ## Impact

GitHub Advisory Database

org.mariadb.jdbc:mariadb-java-client

source listed
  • >= 3.5.0, < 3.5.9

## Summary MariaDB Connector/J does not enforce `allowLocalInfile=false` when processing server-initiated LOCAL INFILE requests (protocol packet type `0xfb`). However, exploitation is constrained: the server can only request the exact filename the client already included in its `LOAD DATA LOCAL INFILE` query, it cannot redirect to arbitrary paths. ## Details When a client executes `LOAD DATA LOCAL INFILE '/path/to/file'`, the connector sends the filename to the server as part of the COM_QUERY. A rogue or MitM server responds with a `0xfb` packet echoing that same filename. The connector, without checking `allowLocalInfile`, transmits the file content. The bypass is therefore limited to the file the application itself intended to load. The attacker cannot escalate to other files (e.g. `/etc/passwd`) unless the application's own query targets them. The real-world risk is: - An application that uses `LOAD DATA LOCAL INFILE` on potentially sensitive files (credentials, exports, configs) and connects over an untrusted network. - `allowLocalInfile=false` is supposed to disable this entire mechanism as a defense-in-depth measure, but the flag is ignored. ## Impact

GitHub Advisory Database

03 / Response

What to do next

  1. investigate

    Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.

    Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. GitHub Advisory Database

A fixed release is not deployment evidence.

Check current vendor support and compatibility. After making a change, verify the deployed build and relevant runtime conditions. Keep the evidence, owner and time. An updated lockfile alone does not prove what is running.

04 / Limits

What this report cannot establish

  • Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.
Read the collection and interpretation limits ↗

05 / Provenance

Sources you can inspect

Each assertion retains its source. Mirrored records may repeat one underlying publisher; additional links are not independent corroboration.

  1. GHSA-wxmm-q36w-r9xj ↗

    GitHub Advisory Database · vendor advisory

    Observed . GitHub Advisory Database; CC-BY-4.0. Each advisory links its original attribution. Null normalizes fields.

Public revision history

Only published revisions appear here. Routine fetches do not create a material-change event.

  1. Revision 1 ·

    First indexed by Null; source disclosure date is shown separately.

Read the public revision data ↗

The next step is private

Bring the question into your environment.

The connected workflow is a development preview for inventory, contextual matching, owner decisions and evidence-based verification. No system-specific result is generated by this page.

See the synthetic workflow preview ↗