By Null Ventures MCP platform
Menu

vulnerability / NVI-00013795 / Revision 2

Traefik: ForwardAuth identity spoofing via dot-form header alias

GitHub lists this reviewed advisory for github.com/traefik/traefik/v2, github.com/traefik/traefik/v3. Published version ranges and source prerequisites are shown below; this is not an inspection of a visitor’s application.

source listedactiveGHSA-rf44-j88r-hh8cCVE-2026-88011

This report has not inspected your inventory, configuration, deployed build, reachability or evidence. A catalog listing and a severity score do not establish exposure or compromise.

01 / Meaning

Why it matters

Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.

EPSS

0.420%

FIRST EPSS model v2026.06.15; exploitation probability over 30 days, percentile 0.36305. Missing scores are unknown.

As of · FIRST EPSS

02 / Applicability

The affected context

Affected versions, configuration prerequisites and known exclusions are public. Confirm each one against the deployed service.

github.com/traefik/traefik/v2

source listed
  • < 2.11.56

## Summary There is a medium severity vulnerability in Traefik's handling of request headers whose name aliases another header name. Go canonicalizes header names on dashes only, so `X-Auth-User`, `X_Auth_User` and `X.Auth.User` are three distinct headers to Traefik, while backends that derive variable names from header names (CGI, WSGI, PHP, NGINX, and others) collapse all of them into the same variable. A client can therefore smuggle an alias of a header that Traefik manages past the middleware managing it — for example a dot-form `X.Authenticated.User` alongside the canonical `X-Authenticated-User` written by the ForwardAuth middleware — and have such a backend read the client-supplied value instead of the identity Traefik asserted. Any header Traefik sets is exposed, not only ForwardAuth's. This is an incomplete-fix sibling of GHSA-x677-9fxg-v5c5, which blocked only the underscore form. The mitigation is the new `aliasHeadersStrategy` entry point option. It defaults to `keep`, which preserves the previous behavior for backwards compatibility, so it must be explicitly set to `delete` or `reject` to take effect. Traefik v1.x, the v2 releases up to v2.11.55 and the v3 releases

GitHub Advisory Database

github.com/traefik/traefik/v3

source listed
  • >= 3.0.0, < 3.7.12

## Summary There is a medium severity vulnerability in Traefik's handling of request headers whose name aliases another header name. Go canonicalizes header names on dashes only, so `X-Auth-User`, `X_Auth_User` and `X.Auth.User` are three distinct headers to Traefik, while backends that derive variable names from header names (CGI, WSGI, PHP, NGINX, and others) collapse all of them into the same variable. A client can therefore smuggle an alias of a header that Traefik manages past the middleware managing it — for example a dot-form `X.Authenticated.User` alongside the canonical `X-Authenticated-User` written by the ForwardAuth middleware — and have such a backend read the client-supplied value instead of the identity Traefik asserted. Any header Traefik sets is exposed, not only ForwardAuth's. This is an incomplete-fix sibling of GHSA-x677-9fxg-v5c5, which blocked only the underscore form. The mitigation is the new `aliasHeadersStrategy` entry point option. It defaults to `keep`, which preserves the previous behavior for backwards compatibility, so it must be explicitly set to `delete` or `reject` to take effect. Traefik v1.x, the v2 releases up to v2.11.55 and the v3 releases

GitHub Advisory Database

03 / Response

What to do next

  1. investigate

    Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.

    Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. FIRST EPSS

A fixed release is not deployment evidence.

Check current vendor support and compatibility. After making a change, verify the deployed build and relevant runtime conditions. Keep the evidence, owner and time. An updated lockfile alone does not prove what is running.

04 / Limits

What this report cannot establish

  • Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.
Read the collection and interpretation limits ↗

05 / Provenance

Sources you can inspect

Each assertion retains its source. Mirrored records may repeat one underlying publisher; additional links are not independent corroboration.

  1. GHSA-rf44-j88r-hh8c ↗

    GitHub Advisory Database · vendor advisory

    Observed . GitHub Advisory Database; CC-BY-4.0. Each advisory links its original attribution. Null normalizes fields.

  2. CVE-2026-88011 ↗

    FIRST EPSS · official catalog

    Observed . FIRST EPSS; probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, not local compromise. Dataset date/model retained; FIRST services terms apply.

Public revision history

Only published revisions appear here. Routine fetches do not create a material-change event.

  1. Revision 2 ·

    Dated EPSS estimate updated; this is not a new disclosure or proof of exploitation.

  2. Revision 1 ·

    First indexed by Null; source disclosure date is shown separately.

Read the public revision data ↗

The next step is private

Bring the question into your environment.

The connected workflow is a development preview for inventory, contextual matching, owner decisions and evidence-based verification. No system-specific result is generated by this page.

See the synthetic workflow preview ↗