vulnerability / NVI-00013805 / Revision 3
AsyncHttpClient stores cookie for an unrelated domain (cookie tossing) via ThreadSafeCookieStore
GitHub lists this reviewed advisory for org.asynchttpclient:async-http-client, org.asynchttpclient:async-http-client. Published version ranges and source prerequisites are shown below; this is not an inspection of a visitor’s application.
This report has not inspected your inventory, configuration, deployed build, reachability or evidence. A catalog listing and a severity score do not establish exposure or compromise.
01 / Meaning
Why it matters
Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.
4 medium
GitHub source severity; exploitability and local consequence require separate evidence.
As of · GitHub Advisory Database
4 MEDIUM (3.1)
security-advisories@github.com severity; no combined Null risk score.
0.330%
FIRST EPSS model v2026.06.15; exploitation probability over 30 days, percentile 0.2618. Missing scores are unknown.
As of · FIRST EPSS
02 / Applicability
The affected context
Affected versions, configuration prerequisites and known exclusions are public. Confirm each one against the deployed service.
org.asynchttpclient:async-http-client
source listed>= 3.0.0.Beta1, < 3.0.11
### Impact A **cookie tossing / cookie injection** issue (CWE-1275). `ThreadSafeCookieStore` stored a cookie under the value of its `Domain` attribute without verifying that the responding host is allowed to set a cookie for that domain (RFC 6265 §5.3 step 6). A host the client connects to can therefore plant a cookie scoped to an unrelated domain, and the client will then send that cookie on later requests to that domain. ### Who is Impacted Applications that use a single `AsyncHttpClient` instance - and thus the default, shared `CookieStore` - to reach **both** an attacker-influenced host and a trusted host. Typical exposure: crawlers, link-preview / webhook fetchers, SSRF-style "fetch this URL" features, multi-backend aggregators, or following redirects to an attacker-controlled host. The attacker can *write* a cookie the client presents to the victim host (session fixation, overwriting a session id / CSRF-token cookie); they cannot *read* the victim host's cookies. Applications that talk only to a fixed trusted backend, or that disable/scope the cookie store, are not exposed. ### Patches Fixed in 3.0.11 and 2.16.0 ### Workarounds - Disable the cookie store (setCookieStore(n
org.asynchttpclient:async-http-client
source listed>= 2.0.0, < 2.16.0
### Impact A **cookie tossing / cookie injection** issue (CWE-1275). `ThreadSafeCookieStore` stored a cookie under the value of its `Domain` attribute without verifying that the responding host is allowed to set a cookie for that domain (RFC 6265 §5.3 step 6). A host the client connects to can therefore plant a cookie scoped to an unrelated domain, and the client will then send that cookie on later requests to that domain. ### Who is Impacted Applications that use a single `AsyncHttpClient` instance - and thus the default, shared `CookieStore` - to reach **both** an attacker-influenced host and a trusted host. Typical exposure: crawlers, link-preview / webhook fetchers, SSRF-style "fetch this URL" features, multi-backend aggregators, or following redirects to an attacker-controlled host. The attacker can *write* a cookie the client presents to the victim host (session fixation, overwriting a session id / CSRF-token cookie); they cannot *read* the victim host's cookies. Applications that talk only to a fixed trusted backend, or that disable/scope the cookie store, are not exposed. ### Patches Fixed in 3.0.11 and 2.16.0 ### Workarounds - Disable the cookie store (setCookieStore(n
03 / Response
What to do next
- investigate
Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.
Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. FIRST EPSS
A fixed release is not deployment evidence.
Check current vendor support and compatibility. After making a change, verify the deployed build and relevant runtime conditions. Keep the evidence, owner and time. An updated lockfile alone does not prove what is running.
04 / Limits
What this report cannot establish
- Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.
- NVD lastModified does not establish freshness of every associated CPE record.
05 / Provenance
Sources you can inspect
Each assertion retains its source. Mirrored records may repeat one underlying publisher; additional links are not independent corroboration.
- GHSA-m452-q8c9-rg2f ↗
GitHub Advisory Database · vendor advisory
Observed . GitHub Advisory Database; CC-BY-4.0. Each advisory links its original attribution. Null normalizes fields.
- CVE-2026-55688 ↗
NIST National Vulnerability Database · official catalog
Observed . This product uses data from the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
- CVE-2026-55688 ↗
FIRST EPSS · official catalog
Observed . FIRST EPSS; probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, not local compromise. Dataset date/model retained; FIRST services terms apply.
Public revision history
Only published revisions appear here. Routine fetches do not create a material-change event.
- Revision 3 ·
Source facts changed; compare the preserved prior revision.
- Revision 2 ·
Dated EPSS estimate updated; this is not a new disclosure or proof of exploitation.
- Revision 1 ·
First indexed by Null; source disclosure date is shown separately.