vulnerability / NVI-00014101 / Revision 1
MCP Atlassian: ENABLED_TOOLS / Toolset authorization bypass
GitHub lists this reviewed advisory for mcp-atlassian. Published version ranges and source prerequisites are shown below; this is not an inspection of a visitor’s application.
This report has not inspected your inventory, configuration, deployed build, reachability or evidence. A catalog listing and a severity score do not establish exposure or compromise.
01 / Meaning
Why it matters
Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.
8.8 high
GitHub source severity; exploitability and local consequence require separate evidence.
As of · GitHub Advisory Database
02 / Applicability
The affected context
Affected versions, configuration prerequisites and known exclusions are public. Confirm each one against the deployed service.
mcp-atlassian
source listed< 0.22.0
### Summary `ENABLED_TOOLS` and `TOOLSETS` filters are enforced at `tools/list` time only. `tools/call` dispatches from the full unfiltered tool registry (73 tools). Any user with access to the server endpoint that knows a tool name can invoke it directly. Tool names are not secret since mcp-atlassian is open source. Any direct JSON-RPC call bypasses the restriction entirely. `READ_ONLY_MODE` is **not** affected: it has dual enforcement at list time (`_list_tools_mcp`) and call time `@check_write_access decorator`. The developers applied the correct pattern to `READ_ONLY_MODE` but not to `ENABLED_TOOLS` or `toolsets` - confirming this is an implementation oversight. ### Impact Any user with access to the MCP server's HTTP endpoint can invoke any of the 73 registered tools regardless of `ENABLED_TOOLS` or `TOOLSETS` configuration - including write and delete operations on Jira issues, Confluence pages, etc. Operators deploying mcp-atlassian via Streamable HTTP rely on `ENABLED_TOOLS` to enforce least-privilege access; the bypass invalidates that model entirely. The security impact concentrates in multi-user / HTTP-transport deployments, where the tool filter is a trust boundary
03 / Response
What to do next
- investigate
Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.
Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. GitHub Advisory Database
A fixed release is not deployment evidence.
Check current vendor support and compatibility. After making a change, verify the deployed build and relevant runtime conditions. Keep the evidence, owner and time. An updated lockfile alone does not prove what is running.
04 / Limits
What this report cannot establish
- Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.
05 / Provenance
Sources you can inspect
Each assertion retains its source. Mirrored records may repeat one underlying publisher; additional links are not independent corroboration.
- GHSA-3r68-hf9h-887v ↗
GitHub Advisory Database · vendor advisory
Observed . GitHub Advisory Database; CC-BY-4.0. Each advisory links its original attribution. Null normalizes fields.
Public revision history
Only published revisions appear here. Routine fetches do not create a material-change event.
- Revision 1 ·
First indexed by Null; source disclosure date is shown separately.