vulnerability / NVI-00014109 / Revision 1
Central Dogma: LDAP injection in SearchFirstActiveDirectoryRealm enables authentication confusion and audit log evasion
GitHub lists this reviewed advisory for com.linecorp.centraldogma:centraldogma-server-auth-shiro. Published version ranges and source prerequisites are shown below; this is not an inspection of a visitor’s application.
This report has not inspected your inventory, configuration, deployed build, reachability or evidence. A catalog listing and a severity score do not establish exposure or compromise.
01 / Meaning
Why it matters
Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.
02 / Applicability
The affected context
Affected versions, configuration prerequisites and known exclusions are public. Confirm each one against the deployed service.
com.linecorp.centraldogma:centraldogma-server-auth-shiro
source listed< 0.84.0
# Vulnerability `SearchFirstActiveDirectoryRealm.findUserDn()` substitutes the user-supplied username from the login form into an LDAP search filter template (default `cn={0}`) **without escaping RFC 4515 filter metacharacters** (`*`, `(`, `)`, `\`, NUL). Combined with `SearchControls.setCountLimit(1)` on the same call site, this allows three distinct attack primitives: 1. **Authentication confusion** — typing username `*` causes the realm to construct filter `cn=*`, return the first directory entry (typically a privileged account in AD ordering), and attempt bind against that DN with the attacker's password. 2. **Audit log evasion** — payload `bob)(uid=alice` is recorded verbatim in audit logs while the realm searches with the malformed filter, breaking accountability/compliance (SOX, PCI-DSS, ISO 27001). 3. **Directory enumeration** — wildcards and timing differences allow reconnaissance of OU structure and admin group membership. A repo-wide search for any LDAP escape helper (`escapeLdap`, `encodeFilter`, `escapeFilter`, `ldapEscape`) returns **zero hits** — the defense is not just missing, it was never added. > **Applicability note:** This realm is opt-in. The shipped defau
03 / Response
What to do next
- investigate
Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.
Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. GitHub Advisory Database
A fixed release is not deployment evidence.
Check current vendor support and compatibility. After making a change, verify the deployed build and relevant runtime conditions. Keep the evidence, owner and time. An updated lockfile alone does not prove what is running.
04 / Limits
What this report cannot establish
- Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.
05 / Provenance
Sources you can inspect
Each assertion retains its source. Mirrored records may repeat one underlying publisher; additional links are not independent corroboration.
- GHSA-98q5-5qh2-7w75 ↗
GitHub Advisory Database · vendor advisory
Observed . GitHub Advisory Database; CC-BY-4.0. Each advisory links its original attribution. Null normalizes fields.
Public revision history
Only published revisions appear here. Routine fetches do not create a material-change event.
- Revision 1 ·
First indexed by Null; source disclosure date is shown separately.