By Null Ventures MCP platform
Menu

vulnerability / NVI-00015366 / Revision 1

SurrealDB: Port-specific --deny-net rules silently bypassed on HTTP redirect

GitHub lists this reviewed advisory for surrealdb. Published version ranges and source prerequisites are shown below; this is not an inspection of a visitor’s application.

source listedactiveGHSA-97vg-427p-8hx5CVE-2026-63743

This report has not inspected your inventory, configuration, deployed build, reachability or evidence. A catalog listing and a severity score do not establish exposure or compromise.

01 / Meaning

Why it matters

Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.

CVSS

6.4 medium

GitHub source severity; exploitability and local consequence require separate evidence.

As of · GitHub Advisory Database

02 / Applicability

The affected context

Affected versions, configuration prerequisites and known exclusions are public. Confirm each one against the deployed service.

surrealdb

source listed
  • < 3.1.0

SurrealDB offers `http::*` functions that can access external network endpoints, with the `--allow-net` and `--deny-net` capabilities used to restrict the set of network targets that can be reached. An authenticated user of SurrealDB can bypass a port-scoped `--deny-net :` rule by chaining an HTTP redirect: the initial request goes to an `--allow-net`-permitted hostname, the response's `3xx Location` header points at the denied `host:port`, and the redirect is followed even though the destination was explicitly denied. The root cause is in the redirect policy applied to outbound HTTP requests (`surrealdb/core/src/fnc/util/http/mod.rs`): the `NetTarget` for the redirect destination is built from `url.host_str()` alone and `url.port()` is dropped. The capability matcher (`surrealdb/core/src/dbs/capabilities.rs:259-264`) refuses to match a port-bearing rule against a port-stripped target (`Self::Host(host, Some(port)) => match tgt { _ => false }`), so the operator's port-scoped deny rule silently does not fire on the redirect target. ### Impact The impact of this vulnerability is circumvention of the `--deny-net` capability when the operator has scoped deny rules by por

GitHub Advisory Database

03 / Response

What to do next

  1. investigate

    Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.

    Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. GitHub Advisory Database

A fixed release is not deployment evidence.

Check current vendor support and compatibility. After making a change, verify the deployed build and relevant runtime conditions. Keep the evidence, owner and time. An updated lockfile alone does not prove what is running.

04 / Limits

What this report cannot establish

  • Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.
Read the collection and interpretation limits ↗

05 / Provenance

Sources you can inspect

Each assertion retains its source. Mirrored records may repeat one underlying publisher; additional links are not independent corroboration.

  1. GHSA-97vg-427p-8hx5 ↗

    GitHub Advisory Database · vendor advisory

    Observed . GitHub Advisory Database; CC-BY-4.0. Each advisory links its original attribution. Null normalizes fields.

Public revision history

Only published revisions appear here. Routine fetches do not create a material-change event.

  1. Revision 1 ·

    First indexed by Null; source disclosure date is shown separately.

Read the public revision data ↗

The next step is private

Bring the question into your environment.

The connected workflow is a development preview for inventory, contextual matching, owner decisions and evidence-based verification. No system-specific result is generated by this page.

See the synthetic workflow preview ↗