By Null Ventures MCP platform
Menu

vulnerability / NVI-00015381 / Revision 1

kcp front-proxy does not strip inbound X-Remote-* identity headers, allowing any authenticated client to inject groups/warrants and impersonate system:masters in any workspace

GitHub lists this reviewed advisory for github.com/kcp-dev/kcp, github.com/kcp-dev/kcp. Published version ranges and source prerequisites are shown below; this is not an inspection of a visitor’s application.

source listedactiveGHSA-c8w2-fgvx-vhv4CVE-2026-61682

This report has not inspected your inventory, configuration, deployed build, reachability or evidence. A catalog listing and a severity score do not establish exposure or compromise.

01 / Meaning

Why it matters

Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.

CVSS

9.9 critical

GitHub source severity; exploitability and local consequence require separate evidence.

As of · GitHub Advisory Database

02 / Applicability

The affected context

Affected versions, configuration prerequisites and known exclusions are public. Confirm each one against the deployed service.

github.com/kcp-dev/kcp

source listed
  • < 0.31.4

# Summary The kcp front-proxy fails to strip client-supplied identity headers before forwarding requests to shards. Any authenticated tenant can inject their own `X-Remote-Group` and `X-Remote-Extra-*` headers, which the shard trusts as a verified identity assertion — allowing a low-privilege user to escalate to cluster administrator (`system:masters`) and read, write, or delete resources in any workspace on the shard. This is a complete multi-tenant isolation and authorization bypass. ## Impact In a sharded kcp deployment, external clients reach shards through the front-proxy, which authenticates the client and then forwards the resulting identity to the shard using Kubernetes request-header authentication (`X-Remote-User` / `X-Remote-Group` / `X-Remote-Extra-*`). The shard trusts these headers because they arrive over the front-proxy's mutually-authenticated connection. Because the front-proxy appended its identity headers instead of replacing them — and never removed any copies the client sent — an authenticated attacker could smuggle forged identity headers through to the shard. With this, an attacker holding any ordinary credential (client certificate, OIDC token, or serv

GitHub Advisory Database

github.com/kcp-dev/kcp

source listed
  • >= 0.32.0, < 0.32.2

# Summary The kcp front-proxy fails to strip client-supplied identity headers before forwarding requests to shards. Any authenticated tenant can inject their own `X-Remote-Group` and `X-Remote-Extra-*` headers, which the shard trusts as a verified identity assertion — allowing a low-privilege user to escalate to cluster administrator (`system:masters`) and read, write, or delete resources in any workspace on the shard. This is a complete multi-tenant isolation and authorization bypass. ## Impact In a sharded kcp deployment, external clients reach shards through the front-proxy, which authenticates the client and then forwards the resulting identity to the shard using Kubernetes request-header authentication (`X-Remote-User` / `X-Remote-Group` / `X-Remote-Extra-*`). The shard trusts these headers because they arrive over the front-proxy's mutually-authenticated connection. Because the front-proxy appended its identity headers instead of replacing them — and never removed any copies the client sent — an authenticated attacker could smuggle forged identity headers through to the shard. With this, an attacker holding any ordinary credential (client certificate, OIDC token, or serv

GitHub Advisory Database

03 / Response

What to do next

  1. investigate

    Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.

    Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. GitHub Advisory Database

A fixed release is not deployment evidence.

Check current vendor support and compatibility. After making a change, verify the deployed build and relevant runtime conditions. Keep the evidence, owner and time. An updated lockfile alone does not prove what is running.

04 / Limits

What this report cannot establish

  • Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.
Read the collection and interpretation limits ↗

05 / Provenance

Sources you can inspect

Each assertion retains its source. Mirrored records may repeat one underlying publisher; additional links are not independent corroboration.

  1. GHSA-c8w2-fgvx-vhv4 ↗

    GitHub Advisory Database · vendor advisory

    Observed . GitHub Advisory Database; CC-BY-4.0. Each advisory links its original attribution. Null normalizes fields.

Public revision history

Only published revisions appear here. Routine fetches do not create a material-change event.

  1. Revision 1 ·

    First indexed by Null; source disclosure date is shown separately.

Read the public revision data ↗

The next step is private

Bring the question into your environment.

The connected workflow is a development preview for inventory, contextual matching, owner decisions and evidence-based verification. No system-specific result is generated by this page.

See the synthetic workflow preview ↗