By Null Ventures MCP platform
Menu

vulnerability / NVI-00016014 / Revision 1

@angular/common: Denial of Service (DoS) via OOM in Date Formatting (formatDate)

GitHub lists this reviewed advisory for @angular/common, @angular/common, @angular/common, @angular/common. Published version ranges and source prerequisites are shown below; this is not an inspection of a visitor’s application.

source listedactiveGHSA-48r7-hpm6-gfxmCVE-2026-54268

This report has not inspected your inventory, configuration, deployed build, reachability or evidence. A catalog listing and a severity score do not establish exposure or compromise.

01 / Meaning

Why it matters

Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.

CVSS

7.5 high

GitHub source severity; exploitability and local consequence require separate evidence.

As of · GitHub Advisory Database

02 / Applicability

The affected context

Affected versions, configuration prerequisites and known exclusions are public. Confirm each one against the deployed service.

@angular/common

source listed
  • >= 22.0.0-next.0, < 22.0.1

A Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability exists in the `@angular/common` package of the Angular framework. The `formatDate` function, which is also utilized by the standard Angular `DatePipe`, does not properly limit or validate the length of the `format` parameter. When parsing a maliciously crafted, excessively long date format string (e.g., a repeating pattern or very large string), the internal parser splits the string iteratively using a regular expression loop. This results in uncontrolled resource consumption (high CPU utilization and excessive memory allocations), leading to a Denial of Service (DoS). ### Impact #### 1. Server-Side Rendering (SSR) In Angular applications that leverage Server-Side Rendering, an attacker can supply a malicious payload with an excessively long date format string. Processing this on the server causes high CPU usage and triggers a `JavaScript heap out of memory` crash, rendering the application unavailable to all users. #### 2. Client-Side Rendering (CSR) In standard client-side applications, executing the vulnerable function with an excessively long format string blocks the browser's main thread, causing the browser tab to freeze and becom

GitHub Advisory Database

@angular/common

source listed
  • >= 21.0.0-next.0, < 21.2.17

A Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability exists in the `@angular/common` package of the Angular framework. The `formatDate` function, which is also utilized by the standard Angular `DatePipe`, does not properly limit or validate the length of the `format` parameter. When parsing a maliciously crafted, excessively long date format string (e.g., a repeating pattern or very large string), the internal parser splits the string iteratively using a regular expression loop. This results in uncontrolled resource consumption (high CPU utilization and excessive memory allocations), leading to a Denial of Service (DoS). ### Impact #### 1. Server-Side Rendering (SSR) In Angular applications that leverage Server-Side Rendering, an attacker can supply a malicious payload with an excessively long date format string. Processing this on the server causes high CPU usage and triggers a `JavaScript heap out of memory` crash, rendering the application unavailable to all users. #### 2. Client-Side Rendering (CSR) In standard client-side applications, executing the vulnerable function with an excessively long format string blocks the browser's main thread, causing the browser tab to freeze and becom

GitHub Advisory Database

@angular/common

source listed
  • >= 20.0.0-next.0, < 20.3.25

A Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability exists in the `@angular/common` package of the Angular framework. The `formatDate` function, which is also utilized by the standard Angular `DatePipe`, does not properly limit or validate the length of the `format` parameter. When parsing a maliciously crafted, excessively long date format string (e.g., a repeating pattern or very large string), the internal parser splits the string iteratively using a regular expression loop. This results in uncontrolled resource consumption (high CPU utilization and excessive memory allocations), leading to a Denial of Service (DoS). ### Impact #### 1. Server-Side Rendering (SSR) In Angular applications that leverage Server-Side Rendering, an attacker can supply a malicious payload with an excessively long date format string. Processing this on the server causes high CPU usage and triggers a `JavaScript heap out of memory` crash, rendering the application unavailable to all users. #### 2. Client-Side Rendering (CSR) In standard client-side applications, executing the vulnerable function with an excessively long format string blocks the browser's main thread, causing the browser tab to freeze and becom

GitHub Advisory Database

@angular/common

source listed
  • <= 19.2.25

A Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability exists in the `@angular/common` package of the Angular framework. The `formatDate` function, which is also utilized by the standard Angular `DatePipe`, does not properly limit or validate the length of the `format` parameter. When parsing a maliciously crafted, excessively long date format string (e.g., a repeating pattern or very large string), the internal parser splits the string iteratively using a regular expression loop. This results in uncontrolled resource consumption (high CPU utilization and excessive memory allocations), leading to a Denial of Service (DoS). ### Impact #### 1. Server-Side Rendering (SSR) In Angular applications that leverage Server-Side Rendering, an attacker can supply a malicious payload with an excessively long date format string. Processing this on the server causes high CPU usage and triggers a `JavaScript heap out of memory` crash, rendering the application unavailable to all users. #### 2. Client-Side Rendering (CSR) In standard client-side applications, executing the vulnerable function with an excessively long format string blocks the browser's main thread, causing the browser tab to freeze and becom

GitHub Advisory Database

03 / Response

What to do next

  1. investigate

    Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.

    Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. GitHub Advisory Database

A fixed release is not deployment evidence.

Check current vendor support and compatibility. After making a change, verify the deployed build and relevant runtime conditions. Keep the evidence, owner and time. An updated lockfile alone does not prove what is running.

04 / Limits

What this report cannot establish

  • Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.
Read the collection and interpretation limits ↗

05 / Provenance

Sources you can inspect

Each assertion retains its source. Mirrored records may repeat one underlying publisher; additional links are not independent corroboration.

  1. GHSA-48r7-hpm6-gfxm ↗

    GitHub Advisory Database · vendor advisory

    Observed . GitHub Advisory Database; CC-BY-4.0. Each advisory links its original attribution. Null normalizes fields.

Public revision history

Only published revisions appear here. Routine fetches do not create a material-change event.

  1. Revision 1 ·

    First indexed by Null; source disclosure date is shown separately.

Read the public revision data ↗

The next step is private

Bring the question into your environment.

The connected workflow is a development preview for inventory, contextual matching, owner decisions and evidence-based verification. No system-specific result is generated by this page.

See the synthetic workflow preview ↗