By Null Ventures MCP platform
Menu

vulnerability / NVI-00016246 / Revision 1

Gogs's Unauthenticated Jupyter Notebook (ipynb) Sanitizer allows arbitrary data: URIs leading to XSS

GitHub lists this reviewed advisory for gogs.io/gogs. Published version ranges and source prerequisites are shown below; this is not an inspection of a visitor’s application.

source listedactiveGHSA-3w28-36p9-w929CVE-2026-52816

This report has not inspected your inventory, configuration, deployed build, reachability or evidence. A catalog listing and a severity score do not establish exposure or compromise.

01 / Meaning

Why it matters

Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.

02 / Applicability

The affected context

Affected versions, configuration prerequisites and known exclusions are public. Confirm each one against the deployed service.

gogs.io/gogs

source listed
  • < 0.14.3

## Summary The Jupyter Notebook (ipynb) sanitizer endpoint at `POST /-/api/sanitize_ipynb` allows arbitrary `data:` URIs without proper restrictions, potentially leading to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). The endpoint uses `bluemonday.UGCPolicy()` with `p.AllowURLSchemes("data")` which permits all data URI schemes including `data:text/html`, enabling attackers to inject malicious HTML/JavaScript. Additionally, the endpoint has no authentication middleware, allowing any registered user to exploit this vulnerability. ## Severity **High** ## Affected Versions All versions using the vulnerable endpoint ## Vulnerability Details - **CVE ID**: (To be assigned) - **Entry Point**: `POST /-/api/sanitize_ipynb` - **Attack Vector**: Network - **Authentication Required**: No (only needs a registered user account) ## Impact An attacker with a registered user account can: - Send malicious HTML containing `data:text/html` URIs to the sanitization endpoint - Receive sanitized but attacker-controlled HTML in the response - Execute arbitrary JavaScript in the attacker's browser context through XSS - Potentially exploit other users if the sanitized output is rendered in their context The vulner

GitHub Advisory Database

03 / Response

What to do next

  1. investigate

    Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.

    Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. GitHub Advisory Database

A fixed release is not deployment evidence.

Check current vendor support and compatibility. After making a change, verify the deployed build and relevant runtime conditions. Keep the evidence, owner and time. An updated lockfile alone does not prove what is running.

04 / Limits

What this report cannot establish

  • Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.
Read the collection and interpretation limits ↗

05 / Provenance

Sources you can inspect

Each assertion retains its source. Mirrored records may repeat one underlying publisher; additional links are not independent corroboration.

  1. GHSA-3w28-36p9-w929 ↗

    GitHub Advisory Database · vendor advisory

    Observed . GitHub Advisory Database; CC-BY-4.0. Each advisory links its original attribution. Null normalizes fields.

Public revision history

Only published revisions appear here. Routine fetches do not create a material-change event.

  1. Revision 1 ·

    First indexed by Null; source disclosure date is shown separately.

Read the public revision data ↗

The next step is private

Bring the question into your environment.

The connected workflow is a development preview for inventory, contextual matching, owner decisions and evidence-based verification. No system-specific result is generated by this page.

See the synthetic workflow preview ↗