vulnerability / NVI-00016249 / Revision 1
PraisonAI SandlockSandbox falls back to unrestricted subprocess execution when Landlock is unavailable
GitHub lists this reviewed advisory for praisonai. Published version ranges and source prerequisites are shown below; this is not an inspection of a visitor’s application.
This report has not inspected your inventory, configuration, deployed build, reachability or evidence. A catalog listing and a severity score do not establish exposure or compromise.
01 / Meaning
Why it matters
Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.
8.8 high
GitHub source severity; exploitability and local consequence require separate evidence.
As of · GitHub Advisory Database
02 / Applicability
The affected context
Affected versions, configuration prerequisites and known exclusions are public. Confirm each one against the deployed service.
praisonai
source listed>= 4.5.110, < 4.6.61
## Summary `praisonai.sandbox.SandlockSandbox` is documented and implemented as the kernel-enforced sandbox backend for untrusted code. Its `SandboxConfig.native()` path lets callers configure allowed filesystem paths and `network=False`. On systems where the optional `sandlock` module imports but reports that Landlock is unavailable, `SandlockSandbox.execute()` and `run_command()` do not fail closed. They silently fall back to `SubprocessSandbox(self.config)`. That fallback keeps the same high-level native policy object but does not enforce the native filesystem or network boundary during code execution. A sandboxed payload can read files outside the configured allowed path and open network connections despite `network=False`. ## Technical Details `SandboxConfig.native()` creates a restricted native policy and records caller-provided writable paths plus the requested network posture: ```python return cls( sandbox_type="native", working_dir=os.getcwd(), security_policy=SecurityPolicy( allow_network=network, allow_file_write=True, allow_subprocess=True, allowed_paths=resolved_paths, ), metadata={"writable_paths": resolved_pat
03 / Response
What to do next
- investigate
Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.
Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. GitHub Advisory Database
A fixed release is not deployment evidence.
Check current vendor support and compatibility. After making a change, verify the deployed build and relevant runtime conditions. Keep the evidence, owner and time. An updated lockfile alone does not prove what is running.
04 / Limits
What this report cannot establish
- Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.
05 / Provenance
Sources you can inspect
Each assertion retains its source. Mirrored records may repeat one underlying publisher; additional links are not independent corroboration.
- GHSA-6jcq-6546-qrrw ↗
GitHub Advisory Database · vendor advisory
Observed . GitHub Advisory Database; CC-BY-4.0. Each advisory links its original attribution. Null normalizes fields.
Public revision history
Only published revisions appear here. Routine fetches do not create a material-change event.
- Revision 1 ·
First indexed by Null; source disclosure date is shown separately.