By Null Ventures MCP platform
Menu

vulnerability / NVI-00016251 / Revision 1

Protobuf: Unbounded recursion depth in embedded-message decoding

GitHub lists this reviewed advisory for protobuf. Published version ranges and source prerequisites are shown below; this is not an inspection of a visitor’s application.

source listedactiveGHSA-rv48-qqj5-crxgCVE-2026-54451

This report has not inspected your inventory, configuration, deployed build, reachability or evidence. A catalog listing and a severity score do not establish exposure or compromise.

01 / Meaning

Why it matters

Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.

02 / Applicability

The affected context

Affected versions, configuration prerequisites and known exclusions are public. Confirm each one against the deployed service.

protobuf

source listed
  • >= 0.8.0, < 0.16.1

### Summary Unbounded recursion depth in `Protobuf.Decoder` (Hex package `protobuf`, versions `>= 0.8.0, < 0.16.1`) lets an unauthenticated attacker crash any service that decodes untrusted protobuf messages whose schema contains a self-referential or cyclic message type. A small request body (a few KB to a few MB) that nests an embedded field hundreds of thousands to millions of levels deep forces the BEAM to recurse once per level, exhausting memory and pinning a scheduler. A handful of such requests can take the node offline (a request-amplification denial of service). ### Details `Protobuf.Decoder.value_for_field/3` handles embedded message fields in its `embedded?: true` branch at `lib/protobuf/decoder.ex:218-243`. For an embedded field it calls `decode(bin, type)` recursively, which re-enters `build_message → handle_value → value_for_field`. The recursive call is not in tail position (its result is consumed by the surrounding decode after it returns), so every nesting level retains a live frame on the process stack and heap. There is no recursion-depth counter anywhere in the decoder. For any schema with a self-referential message type (e.g. `message Tree { Tree child = 1

GitHub Advisory Database

03 / Response

What to do next

  1. investigate

    Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.

    Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. GitHub Advisory Database

A fixed release is not deployment evidence.

Check current vendor support and compatibility. After making a change, verify the deployed build and relevant runtime conditions. Keep the evidence, owner and time. An updated lockfile alone does not prove what is running.

04 / Limits

What this report cannot establish

  • Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.
Read the collection and interpretation limits ↗

05 / Provenance

Sources you can inspect

Each assertion retains its source. Mirrored records may repeat one underlying publisher; additional links are not independent corroboration.

  1. GHSA-rv48-qqj5-crxg ↗

    GitHub Advisory Database · vendor advisory

    Observed . GitHub Advisory Database; CC-BY-4.0. Each advisory links its original attribution. Null normalizes fields.

Public revision history

Only published revisions appear here. Routine fetches do not create a material-change event.

  1. Revision 1 ·

    First indexed by Null; source disclosure date is shown separately.

Read the public revision data ↗

The next step is private

Bring the question into your environment.

The connected workflow is a development preview for inventory, contextual matching, owner decisions and evidence-based verification. No system-specific result is generated by this page.

See the synthetic workflow preview ↗