By Null Ventures MCP platform
Menu

vulnerability / NVI-00016370 / Revision 1

HTTPX2: Quadratic SSE line buffering can cause CPU denial of service

GitHub lists this reviewed advisory for httpx2. Published version ranges and source prerequisites are shown below; this is not an inspection of a visitor’s application.

source listedactiveGHSA-f2fp-rgf2-35cpCVE-2026-84378

This report has not inspected your inventory, configuration, deployed build, reachability or evidence. A catalog listing and a severity score do not establish exposure or compromise.

01 / Meaning

Why it matters

Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.

CVSS

5.9 medium

GitHub source severity; exploitability and local consequence require separate evidence.

As of · GitHub Advisory Database

02 / Applicability

The affected context

Affected versions, configuration prerequisites and known exclusions are public. Confirm each one against the deployed service.

httpx2

source listed
  • >= 2.5.0, < 2.10.0

### Summary HTTPX2's Server-Sent Events (SSE) parser repeatedly copied and rescanned buffered text when a server split one unterminated line across many response chunks. The total work grows quadratically with the length of the line. An attacker-controlled or compromised SSE endpoint can exploit this behavior to consume excessive client CPU. ### Details Before version 2.10.0, HTTPX2 combined the complete pending SSE line with each newly received chunk and then scanned the combined text for line separators. If an SSE server sends a long line as many small chunks without a line separator, every chunk causes all previously received text to be copied and scanned again. For `n` fixed-size chunks, this results in O(n²) processing. The behavior affects both `httpx2.Client.sse()` and `httpx2.AsyncClient.sse()`. Other response APIs do not use the SSE parsing path. ### Impact Applications that consume SSE from an attacker-controlled or compromised endpoint can experience excessive CPU usage. A crafted stream can block a synchronous worker or the asynchronous event loop that is consuming it, degrading availability for other work in that process. Confidentiality and integrity are not aff

GitHub Advisory Database

03 / Response

What to do next

  1. investigate

    Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.

    Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. GitHub Advisory Database

A fixed release is not deployment evidence.

Check current vendor support and compatibility. After making a change, verify the deployed build and relevant runtime conditions. Keep the evidence, owner and time. An updated lockfile alone does not prove what is running.

04 / Limits

What this report cannot establish

  • Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.
Read the collection and interpretation limits ↗

05 / Provenance

Sources you can inspect

Each assertion retains its source. Mirrored records may repeat one underlying publisher; additional links are not independent corroboration.

  1. GHSA-f2fp-rgf2-35cp ↗

    GitHub Advisory Database · vendor advisory

    Observed . GitHub Advisory Database; CC-BY-4.0. Each advisory links its original attribution. Null normalizes fields.

Public revision history

Only published revisions appear here. Routine fetches do not create a material-change event.

  1. Revision 1 ·

    First indexed by Null; source disclosure date is shown separately.

Read the public revision data ↗

The next step is private

Bring the question into your environment.

The connected workflow is a development preview for inventory, contextual matching, owner decisions and evidence-based verification. No system-specific result is generated by this page.

See the synthetic workflow preview ↗