By Null Ventures MCP platform
Menu

vulnerability / NVI-00017495 / Revision 1

oban_web: Unbounded range expansion in cron describe causes memory exhaustion

GitHub lists this reviewed advisory for oban_web. Published version ranges and source prerequisites are shown below; this is not an inspection of a visitor’s application.

source listedactiveGHSA-6xh2-93p9-vqh4CVE-2026-48593

This report has not inspected your inventory, configuration, deployed build, reachability or evidence. A catalog listing and a severity score do not establish exposure or compromise.

01 / Meaning

Why it matters

Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.

02 / Applicability

The affected context

Affected versions, configuration prerequisites and known exclusions are public. Confirm each one against the deployed service.

oban_web

source listed
  • >= 2.12.0, < 2.12.5

### Summary `oban_web` 2.12.0 introduced a cron expression parser that expands `-`-separated ranges without validating the endpoints. An attacker with access to schedule cron jobs can submit a malicious expression; when any user with dashboard access views the cron job list, `Oban.Web.CronExpr.describe/1` is called to render it, triggering allocation of gigabytes of memory and stalling or crashing the BEAM node. ### Details **1. Scheduling:** The attacker submits a cron job with a malicious expression such as `"0 0 1-100000000 * *"`. No special privilege is required beyond the ability to schedule cron jobs. **2. Parsing:** When the cron list is rendered in the dashboard, `describe/1` calls `parse_range/1` in `lib/oban/web/cron_expr.ex`, which calls `Integer.parse/1` on both endpoints of the range with no bounds check, returning `{:range, start_val, end_val}` for any integers. **3. Eager expansion:** `expand_dom_parts/1` and `expand_dow_parts/1` materialise the range via `Enum.to_list(start_val..end_val)`. The input above produces ~100 million integers (~2.4 GB). A sibling helper `extract_dom_values` already validates range bounds, but the expansion helpers do not. ### PoC 1.

GitHub Advisory Database

03 / Response

What to do next

  1. investigate

    Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.

    Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. GitHub Advisory Database

A fixed release is not deployment evidence.

Check current vendor support and compatibility. After making a change, verify the deployed build and relevant runtime conditions. Keep the evidence, owner and time. An updated lockfile alone does not prove what is running.

04 / Limits

What this report cannot establish

  • Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.
Read the collection and interpretation limits ↗

05 / Provenance

Sources you can inspect

Each assertion retains its source. Mirrored records may repeat one underlying publisher; additional links are not independent corroboration.

  1. GHSA-6xh2-93p9-vqh4 ↗

    GitHub Advisory Database · vendor advisory

    Observed . GitHub Advisory Database; CC-BY-4.0. Each advisory links its original attribution. Null normalizes fields.

Public revision history

Only published revisions appear here. Routine fetches do not create a material-change event.

  1. Revision 1 ·

    First indexed by Null; source disclosure date is shown separately.

Read the public revision data ↗

The next step is private

Bring the question into your environment.

The connected workflow is a development preview for inventory, contextual matching, owner decisions and evidence-based verification. No system-specific result is generated by this page.

See the synthetic workflow preview ↗