By Null Ventures MCP platform
Menu

vulnerability / NVI-00017563 / Revision 1

Authelia Missing Username Canonicalization in Basic Auth (LDAP)

GitHub lists this reviewed advisory for github.com/authelia/authelia/v4. Published version ranges and source prerequisites are shown below; this is not an inspection of a visitor’s application.

source listedactiveGHSA-hjj4-hfjm-fmrjCVE-2026-47203

This report has not inspected your inventory, configuration, deployed build, reachability or evidence. A catalog listing and a severity score do not establish exposure or compromise.

01 / Meaning

Why it matters

Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.

02 / Applicability

The affected context

Affected versions, configuration prerequisites and known exclusions are public. Confirm each one against the deployed service.

github.com/authelia/authelia/v4

source listed
  • >= 4.38.0, <= 4.39.19

### Impact **CVSSv4 Baseline Score:** Moderate 6.3 **CVSSv4 Weighted Score:** Low 2.9 The full CVSSv4 Vector for this vulnerability is: > CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:L/IR:L/AR:L/MAV:N/MAC:H/MAT:N/MPR:N/MUI:N/MVC:L/MVI:N/MVA:N/MSC:N/MSI:N/MSA:N/S:N/AU:Y/R:U/V:D/RE:L/U:Green **CVSSv3.1 Baseline Score:** Low 3.7 **CVSSv3.1 Overall Score:** Medium 4.0 The full CVSSv3.1 Vector equivalent for this vulnerability is: > CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N/E:P/RL:O/RC:X/CR:H/IR:L/AR:L/MAV:N/MAC:H/MPR:N/MUI:N/MS:U/MC:L/MI:N/MA:N The weighted severity rating is a result of no indication this is currently being exploited being available at the time of the publish date, in addition to the fact it's unlikely that it is being exploited currently. Due to lack of canonicalization of the basic auth username, the effectiveness of the brute force mechanism when using basic auth is partially degraded. Most passwords of reasonable length are unlikely to have a meaningful effect due to the fact there is no clear feedback to an attacker that is attempting to exploit this, thus their brute force attempts are significantly more likely to miss a v

GitHub Advisory Database

03 / Response

What to do next

  1. investigate

    Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.

    Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. GitHub Advisory Database

A fixed release is not deployment evidence.

Check current vendor support and compatibility. After making a change, verify the deployed build and relevant runtime conditions. Keep the evidence, owner and time. An updated lockfile alone does not prove what is running.

04 / Limits

What this report cannot establish

  • Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.
Read the collection and interpretation limits ↗

05 / Provenance

Sources you can inspect

Each assertion retains its source. Mirrored records may repeat one underlying publisher; additional links are not independent corroboration.

  1. GHSA-hjj4-hfjm-fmrj ↗

    GitHub Advisory Database · vendor advisory

    Observed . GitHub Advisory Database; CC-BY-4.0. Each advisory links its original attribution. Null normalizes fields.

Public revision history

Only published revisions appear here. Routine fetches do not create a material-change event.

  1. Revision 1 ·

    First indexed by Null; source disclosure date is shown separately.

Read the public revision data ↗

The next step is private

Bring the question into your environment.

The connected workflow is a development preview for inventory, contextual matching, owner decisions and evidence-based verification. No system-specific result is generated by this page.

See the synthetic workflow preview ↗