By Null Ventures MCP platform
Menu

vulnerability / NVI-00017858 / Revision 1

Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins have local privilege escalation using embedded command

GitHub lists this reviewed advisory for linuxfabrik-lib. Published version ranges and source prerequisites are shown below; this is not an inspection of a visitor’s application.

source listedactiveGHSA-798h-hpph-m24jCVE-2026-55426

This report has not inspected your inventory, configuration, deployed build, reachability or evidence. A catalog listing and a severity score do not establish exposure or compromise.

01 / Meaning

Why it matters

Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.

CVSS

7.8 high

GitHub source severity; exploitability and local consequence require separate evidence.

As of · GitHub Advisory Database

02 / Applicability

The affected context

Affected versions, configuration prerequisites and known exclusions are public. Confirm each one against the deployed service.

linuxfabrik-lib

source listed
  • < 5.0.0

### Summary When a check plugin places user provided input inside a command which is passed to `shell_exec`, an attacker can abuse this to run arbitrary commands. This is mainly dangerous for plugins which are listed in the sudoers file, because this allows an attacker controlling the nagios user to get root privileges. ### Details An example for this is the `restic-check` plugin, where the `--repo` argument is placed inside the command argument of `shell_exec`. As an example, an attacker could use the `--repo` argument `|touch /root/nagios-was-here|`. The full restic command is assembled to the string `restic --json --repo=|touch /root/nagios-was-here| --password-file= check` before it is passed to `shell_exec`. `shell_exec` then splits the command up in three parts at the | boundaries and executes the parts separately, which also executes the embedded command `touch /root/nagios-was-here`. ### PoC This PoC shows how the nagios user can use this to create a file inside `/root`. ``` nagios@test-vm:/$ sudo /usr/lib64/nagios/plugins/restic-check --repo '|touch /root/nagios-was-here|' ``` ### Impact The vulnerability is a local privilege escalation. ### Fix #### Switch from | to

GitHub Advisory Database

03 / Response

What to do next

  1. investigate

    Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.

    Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. GitHub Advisory Database

A fixed release is not deployment evidence.

Check current vendor support and compatibility. After making a change, verify the deployed build and relevant runtime conditions. Keep the evidence, owner and time. An updated lockfile alone does not prove what is running.

04 / Limits

What this report cannot establish

  • Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.
Read the collection and interpretation limits ↗

05 / Provenance

Sources you can inspect

Each assertion retains its source. Mirrored records may repeat one underlying publisher; additional links are not independent corroboration.

  1. GHSA-798h-hpph-m24j ↗

    GitHub Advisory Database · vendor advisory

    Observed . GitHub Advisory Database; CC-BY-4.0. Each advisory links its original attribution. Null normalizes fields.

Public revision history

Only published revisions appear here. Routine fetches do not create a material-change event.

  1. Revision 1 ·

    First indexed by Null; source disclosure date is shown separately.

Read the public revision data ↗

The next step is private

Bring the question into your environment.

The connected workflow is a development preview for inventory, contextual matching, owner decisions and evidence-based verification. No system-specific result is generated by this page.

See the synthetic workflow preview ↗