By Null Ventures MCP platform
Menu

vulnerability / NVI-00018275 / Revision 1

dssrf: every IPv6 category bypasses is_url_safe

GitHub lists this reviewed advisory for dssrf. Published version ranges and source prerequisites are shown below; this is not an inspection of a visitor’s application.

source listedactiveGHSA-8p33-q827-ghj5CVE-2026-44232

This report has not inspected your inventory, configuration, deployed build, reachability or evidence. A catalog listing and a severity score do not establish exposure or compromise.

01 / Meaning

Why it matters

Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.

02 / Applicability

The affected context

Affected versions, configuration prerequisites and known exclusions are public. Confirm each one against the deployed service.

dssrf

source listed
  • < 1.0.3

A vulnerability on dssrf allow, an attacker to use, one of them following ipv6 ```rust Input Category http://[::1]/ IPv6 loopback http://[fc00::1]/ IPv6 ULA http://[fe80::1]/ IPv6 link-local http://[::ffff:127.0.0.1]/ IPv4-mapped loopback http://[::ffff:169.254.169.254]/ IPv4-mapped IMDS http://[::ffff:100.64.0.1]/ IPv4-mapped CGNAT http://[64:ff9b::7f00:1]/ NAT64 well-known prefix http://[64:ff9b:1::1]/ NAT64 local-use (RFC 8215) http://[5f00::1]/ SRv6 SID (RFC 9602) http://[3fff::1]/ IPv6 documentation (RFC 9637) http://[fec0::1]/ IPv6 site-local (deprecated, RFC 3879) http://[::127.0.0.1]/ IPv4-compatible IPv6 ``` one of those to bypass dssrf and the attacker get **SSRF**, we claim that ipv6 disabled entirely that is wrong on our documentation ### POC ```bash mkdir dssrf-poc && cd dssrf-poc npm init -y >/dev/null npm install dssrf@^1.0.2 cat > audit.js <<'EOF' const dssrf = require('dssrf'); const cases = [ ['http://[::1]/', 'IPv6 loopback'], ['http://[fc00::1]/', 'IPv6 ULA'], ['http://[fe80::1]/', 'IPv6 link-local'], ['http://[::ffff:127.0.0.1]/', 'IPv4-mapped loopback'], ['http://[::ffff:1

GitHub Advisory Database

03 / Response

What to do next

  1. investigate

    Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.

    Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. GitHub Advisory Database

A fixed release is not deployment evidence.

Check current vendor support and compatibility. After making a change, verify the deployed build and relevant runtime conditions. Keep the evidence, owner and time. An updated lockfile alone does not prove what is running.

04 / Limits

What this report cannot establish

  • Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.
Read the collection and interpretation limits ↗

05 / Provenance

Sources you can inspect

Each assertion retains its source. Mirrored records may repeat one underlying publisher; additional links are not independent corroboration.

  1. GHSA-8p33-q827-ghj5 ↗

    GitHub Advisory Database · vendor advisory

    Observed . GitHub Advisory Database; CC-BY-4.0. Each advisory links its original attribution. Null normalizes fields.

Public revision history

Only published revisions appear here. Routine fetches do not create a material-change event.

  1. Revision 1 ·

    First indexed by Null; source disclosure date is shown separately.

Read the public revision data ↗

The next step is private

Bring the question into your environment.

The connected workflow is a development preview for inventory, contextual matching, owner decisions and evidence-based verification. No system-specific result is generated by this page.

See the synthetic workflow preview ↗