By Null Ventures MCP platform
Menu

vulnerability / NVI-00018349 / Revision 1

Sveltia CMS: Stored XSS in Markdown/RichText preview via unsandboxed same-origin iframe

GitHub lists this reviewed advisory for @sveltia/cms. Published version ranges and source prerequisites are shown below; this is not an inspection of a visitor’s application.

source listedactiveGHSA-h5jc-78hr-3pc9

This report has not inspected your inventory, configuration, deployed build, reachability or evidence. A catalog listing and a severity score do not establish exposure or compromise.

01 / Meaning

Why it matters

Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.

02 / Applicability

The affected context

Affected versions, configuration prerequisites and known exclusions are public. Confirm each one against the deployed service.

@sveltia/cms

source listed
  • < 0.167.3

### Impact A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability affected the Markdown/RichText field preview renderer in Sveltia CMS. The DOMPurify sanitization configuration used for Markdown previews explicitly permitted `iframe` elements without enforcing a `sandbox` attribute or restricting iframe sources. Sanitized Markdown output was then inserted into the CMS preview DOM as raw HTML. Because no sandboxing or source validation was applied, a Markdown field containing an `iframe` whose src pointed to a same-origin uploaded or publicly accessible HTML asset would render an unsandboxed iframe. JavaScript in the framed document could then access the parent CMS window via the browser’s same-origin policy, allowing it to read and write the parent window’s state, DOM, and browser storage, and to trigger actions in the CMS context. The practical impact is limited in currently supported Sveltia CMS usage because the CMS is intended for a single developer or a small trusted team, and open authoring / untrusted multi-user authoring is not currently implemented. Exploitation requires the ability to place malicious content into the reposito

GitHub Advisory Database

03 / Response

What to do next

  1. investigate

    Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.

    Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. GitHub Advisory Database

A fixed release is not deployment evidence.

Check current vendor support and compatibility. After making a change, verify the deployed build and relevant runtime conditions. Keep the evidence, owner and time. An updated lockfile alone does not prove what is running.

04 / Limits

What this report cannot establish

  • Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.
Read the collection and interpretation limits ↗

05 / Provenance

Sources you can inspect

Each assertion retains its source. Mirrored records may repeat one underlying publisher; additional links are not independent corroboration.

  1. GHSA-h5jc-78hr-3pc9 ↗

    GitHub Advisory Database · vendor advisory

    Observed . GitHub Advisory Database; CC-BY-4.0. Each advisory links its original attribution. Null normalizes fields.

Public revision history

Only published revisions appear here. Routine fetches do not create a material-change event.

  1. Revision 1 ·

    First indexed by Null; source disclosure date is shown separately.

Read the public revision data ↗

The next step is private

Bring the question into your environment.

The connected workflow is a development preview for inventory, contextual matching, owner decisions and evidence-based verification. No system-specific result is generated by this page.

See the synthetic workflow preview ↗