By Null Ventures MCP platform
Menu

vulnerability / NVI-00018376 / Revision 1

motionEye: Authentication possible via password hash

GitHub lists this reviewed advisory for motioneye. Published version ranges and source prerequisites are shown below; this is not an inspection of a visitor’s application.

source listedactiveGHSA-r3cw-c95m-wfh9CVE-2026-46488

This report has not inspected your inventory, configuration, deployed build, reachability or evidence. A catalog listing and a severity score do not establish exposure or compromise.

01 / Meaning

Why it matters

Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.

02 / Applicability

The affected context

Affected versions, configuration prerequisites and known exclusions are public. Confirm each one against the deployed service.

motioneye

source listed
  • < 0.44.0

### Summary An authentication bypass vulnerability exists due to improper trust in client-controlled cookies. The application accepts user-supplied cookie values containing a username and password-hash-derived value as sufficient authentication material. These cookies can be set or modified prior to login, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to impersonate arbitrary users without knowledge of the plaintext password. This issue stems from the absence of server-side validation of authentication state and reliance on attacker-controlled cookie data ### Details The vulnerability arises because the application accepts the client-supplied cookies named `meye_password_hash` and `meye_username` as sufficient authentication material. The server does not validate these values against a server-side session or enforce proper authentication checks before establishing an authenticated state. As a result, an unauthenticated attacker can set or modify these cookies to impersonate another user if the target username and corresponding hash are known. These cookies normally appear after using the "switch user" functionality; however, they can be added manually prior to authentication using standar

GitHub Advisory Database

03 / Response

What to do next

  1. investigate

    Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.

    Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. GitHub Advisory Database

A fixed release is not deployment evidence.

Check current vendor support and compatibility. After making a change, verify the deployed build and relevant runtime conditions. Keep the evidence, owner and time. An updated lockfile alone does not prove what is running.

04 / Limits

What this report cannot establish

  • Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.
Read the collection and interpretation limits ↗

05 / Provenance

Sources you can inspect

Each assertion retains its source. Mirrored records may repeat one underlying publisher; additional links are not independent corroboration.

  1. GHSA-r3cw-c95m-wfh9 ↗

    GitHub Advisory Database · vendor advisory

    Observed . GitHub Advisory Database; CC-BY-4.0. Each advisory links its original attribution. Null normalizes fields.

Public revision history

Only published revisions appear here. Routine fetches do not create a material-change event.

  1. Revision 1 ·

    First indexed by Null; source disclosure date is shown separately.

Read the public revision data ↗

The next step is private

Bring the question into your environment.

The connected workflow is a development preview for inventory, contextual matching, owner decisions and evidence-based verification. No system-specific result is generated by this page.

See the synthetic workflow preview ↗