By Null Ventures MCP platform
Menu

vulnerability / NVI-00018606 / Revision 1

Nautobot: Webhook definitions could be used for server-side request forgery (SSRF)

GitHub lists this reviewed advisory for nautobot, nautobot. Published version ranges and source prerequisites are shown below; this is not an inspection of a visitor’s application.

source listedactiveGHSA-c35q-vxrp-ph26CVE-2026-44797

This report has not inspected your inventory, configuration, deployed build, reachability or evidence. A catalog listing and a severity score do not establish exposure or compromise.

01 / Meaning

Why it matters

Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.

CVSS

8.5 high

GitHub source severity; exploitability and local consequence require separate evidence.

As of · GitHub Advisory Database

02 / Applicability

The affected context

Affected versions, configuration prerequisites and known exclusions are public. Confirm each one against the deployed service.

nautobot

source listed
  • >= 3.0.0a2, < 3.1.2

### Impact Nautobot's `Webhook` data model and associated feature set could be configured by users with sufficient access to perform requests to various hosts and IP addresses that should not be permitted, allowing for various behaviors similar to server-side request forgery (SSRF). ### Patches Fixes are available in Nautobot v2.4.33 and v3.1.2. In support of this fix, three new settings variables have been added to Nautobot: - `WEBHOOK_ALLOWED_SCHEMES` - By default new or updated `Webhook` records will be restricted to HTTP or HTTPS only, disallowing other schemes that may have been previously allowed. Administrators should audit existing `Webhook` records to identify any that are invalid, and either update/delete said records or customize `WEBHOOK_ALLOWED_SCHEMES` as appropriate. - `WEBHOOK_ADDITIONAL_BLOCKED_NETWORKS` - This can be used to specify additional IP networks that should be denied to `Webhook` sending, for example some deployments may wish to disallow RFC1918 addresses or even disallow all networks and carve out specific exemptions using the following setting. - `WEBHOOK_ALLOWED_HOSTS` - This can be used to provide an allow-list of specific hosts that would other

GitHub Advisory Database

nautobot

source listed
  • < 2.4.33

### Impact Nautobot's `Webhook` data model and associated feature set could be configured by users with sufficient access to perform requests to various hosts and IP addresses that should not be permitted, allowing for various behaviors similar to server-side request forgery (SSRF). ### Patches Fixes are available in Nautobot v2.4.33 and v3.1.2. In support of this fix, three new settings variables have been added to Nautobot: - `WEBHOOK_ALLOWED_SCHEMES` - By default new or updated `Webhook` records will be restricted to HTTP or HTTPS only, disallowing other schemes that may have been previously allowed. Administrators should audit existing `Webhook` records to identify any that are invalid, and either update/delete said records or customize `WEBHOOK_ALLOWED_SCHEMES` as appropriate. - `WEBHOOK_ADDITIONAL_BLOCKED_NETWORKS` - This can be used to specify additional IP networks that should be denied to `Webhook` sending, for example some deployments may wish to disallow RFC1918 addresses or even disallow all networks and carve out specific exemptions using the following setting. - `WEBHOOK_ALLOWED_HOSTS` - This can be used to provide an allow-list of specific hosts that would other

GitHub Advisory Database

03 / Response

What to do next

  1. investigate

    Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.

    Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. GitHub Advisory Database

A fixed release is not deployment evidence.

Check current vendor support and compatibility. After making a change, verify the deployed build and relevant runtime conditions. Keep the evidence, owner and time. An updated lockfile alone does not prove what is running.

04 / Limits

What this report cannot establish

  • Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.
Read the collection and interpretation limits ↗

05 / Provenance

Sources you can inspect

Each assertion retains its source. Mirrored records may repeat one underlying publisher; additional links are not independent corroboration.

  1. GHSA-c35q-vxrp-ph26 ↗

    GitHub Advisory Database · vendor advisory

    Observed . GitHub Advisory Database; CC-BY-4.0. Each advisory links its original attribution. Null normalizes fields.

Public revision history

Only published revisions appear here. Routine fetches do not create a material-change event.

  1. Revision 1 ·

    First indexed by Null; source disclosure date is shown separately.

Read the public revision data ↗

The next step is private

Bring the question into your environment.

The connected workflow is a development preview for inventory, contextual matching, owner decisions and evidence-based verification. No system-specific result is generated by this page.

See the synthetic workflow preview ↗