vulnerability / NVI-00009116 / Revision 4
Happy DOM has cookie scope forgery: no DNS-label boundary on Domain= matching , attacker origin sets victim cookies
GitHub lists this reviewed advisory for happy-dom. Published version ranges and source prerequisites are shown below; this is not an inspection of a visitor’s application.
This report has not inspected your inventory, configuration, deployed build, reachability or evidence. A catalog listing and a severity score do not establish exposure or compromise.
01 / Meaning
Why it matters
Published affected context helps an owner decide what evidence to gather. This report has not examined your application.
6.5 medium
GitHub source severity; exploitability and local consequence require separate evidence.
As of · GitHub Advisory Database
0.272%
FIRST EPSS model v2026.06.15; exploitation probability over 30 days, percentile 0.19656. Missing scores are unknown.
As of · FIRST EPSS
02 / Applicability
The affected context
Affected versions, configuration prerequisites and known exclusions are public. Confirm each one against the deployed service.
happy-dom
source listed<= 20.14.5
### Summary A cookie-scoping bug in happy-dom lets an attacker origin set cookies that a victim origin then receives, diverging from browser semantics. ### Details happy-dom matches Domain=example.com against notexample.com (endsWith without a DNS-label boundary), diverging from browser semantics (verified 20.11.6 npm latest: cookieMatchesURL(Domain=example.com, url=http://notexample.com) = true). Relevant where happy-dom is used for SSR/prerender cookie handling. Matching in src/cookie/CookieContainer.ts. ### PoC Run: ```bash node poc-happydom-cookie-domain.js ``` Full proof-of-concept source (poc-happydom-cookie-domain.js): ```js // PoC: happy-dom cookie-domain scoping gap -> cross-origin cookie injection / session fixation // Chain: app (window at http://localhost:PORT2) fetches attacker server (http://127.0.0.1:PORT1) // -> attacker Set-Cookie with Domain=localhost (a host that is NOT a suffix of 127.0.0.1) // -> happy-dom stores it (a real browser rejects: RFC 6265 §5.3.6-7 + PSL) // -> app's same-origin fetch to http://localhost:PORT2/api/account carries the forged cookie // Run: cd C:/Users/rncb0/AppData/Local/Temp/0day && node poc/poc-happydom-cook
happy-dom
source listedSEMVER: introduced 0; fixed 20.14.6
### Summary A cookie-scoping bug in happy-dom lets an attacker origin set cookies that a victim origin then receives, diverging from browser semantics. ### Details happy-dom matches Domain=example.com against notexample.com (endsWith without a DNS-label boundary), diverging from browser semantics (verified 20.11.6 npm latest: cookieMatchesURL(Domain=example.com, url=http://notexample.com) = true). Relevant where happy-dom is used for SSR/prerender cookie handling. Matching in src/cookie/CookieContainer.ts. ### PoC Run: ```bash node poc-happydom-cookie-domain.js ``` Full proof-of-concept source (poc-happydom-cookie-domain.js): ```js // PoC: happy-dom cookie-domain scoping gap -> cross-origin cookie injection / session fixation // Chain: app (window at http://localhost:PORT2) fetches attacker server (http://127.0.0.1:PORT1) // -> attacker Set-Cookie with Domain=localhost (a host that is NOT a suffix of 127.0.0.1) // -> happy-dom stores it (a real browser rejects: RFC 6265 §5.3.6-7 + PSL) // -> app's same-origin fetch to http://localhost:PORT2/api/account carries the forged cookie // Run: cd C:/Users/rncb0/AppData/Local/Temp/0day && node poc/poc-happydom-cook
03 / Response
What to do next
- investigate
Identify the exact component and deployed version, examine the linked publisher’s conditions, and retain evidence of any mitigation.
Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. FIRST EPSS
- vendor patch
The original advisory lists fixed boundaries 20.14.6 for happy-dom. Confirm the publisher’s latest guidance.
Confirm current vendor support, compatibility and deployment evidence. This report has not tested a fix in your system. GitHub Advisory Database via OSV
A fixed release is not deployment evidence.
Check current vendor support and compatibility. After making a change, verify the deployed build and relevant runtime conditions. Keep the evidence, owner and time. An updated lockfile alone does not prove what is running.
04 / Limits
What this report cannot establish
- Customer inventory, deployment, reachability and exploitation have not been inspected.
05 / Provenance
Sources you can inspect
Each assertion retains its source. Mirrored records may repeat one underlying publisher; additional links are not independent corroboration.
- GHSA-5fpq-26gf-qwcr ↗
GitHub Advisory Database · vendor advisory
Observed . GitHub Advisory Database; CC-BY-4.0. Each advisory links its original attribution. Null normalizes fields.
- GHSA-5fpq-26gf-qwcr ↗
GitHub Advisory Database via OSV · vendor advisory
Observed . GitHub-origin advisory, CC-BY-4.0; OSV is an aggregate copy, not independent corroboration.
- CVE-2026-118661 ↗
FIRST EPSS · official catalog
Observed . FIRST EPSS; probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, not local compromise. Dataset date/model retained; FIRST services terms apply.
Public revision history
Only published revisions appear here. Routine fetches do not create a material-change event.
- Revision 4 ·
Dated EPSS estimate updated; this is not a new disclosure or proof of exploitation.
- Revision 3 ·
Dated EPSS estimate updated; this is not a new disclosure or proof of exploitation.
- Revision 2 ·
Source facts changed; compare the preserved prior revision.
- Revision 1 ·
First indexed by Null; source disclosure date is shown separately.